Literature DB >> 15868175

Orientation-specific fast rTMS maximizes corticospinal inhibition and facilitation.

Tobias Tings1, Nicolas Lang, Frithjof Tergau, Walter Paulus, Martin Sommer.   

Abstract

Specific stimulation of neuronal circuits may promote selective inhibition or facilitation of corticospinal tract excitability. Monophasic stimulation is more likely to achieve direction-specific neuronal excitation. In 10 healthy subjects, we compared four types of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), monophasic and biphasic stimuli with the initial current in the brain flowing antero-posteriorly ("posteriorly directed") or postero-anteriorly ("anteriorly directed"). We applied rTMS over the primary motor cortex contralateral to the dominant hand, using 80 stimuli at 5 Hz frequency at an intensity yielding baseline motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes of 1 mV. Monophasic stimulation was always more efficient than biphasic. Facilitation was induced by intracerebral anteriorly directed current flow and inhibition by posteriorly oriented current flow, although only initially for approximately 30 pulses. The early inhibition was absent when studied during a tonic muscle contraction. Several mechanisms could account for these findings. They include a more efficient excitation of inhibiting circuits by posteriorly oriented pulses, and a back-propagating D-wave inhibiting early I-waves and thus inducing early inhibition of MEP amplitude. In any case biphasic rTMS results can be explained by a mixture of monophasic opposite stimulations. We propose the use of monophasic pulses for maximizing effects during rTMS.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15868175     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-2253-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  39 in total

1.  Influence of pulse configuration and direction of coil current on excitatory effects of magnetic motor cortex and nerve stimulation.

Authors:  L Niehaus; B U Meyer; T Weyh
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Effects of low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor excitability and basic motor behavior.

Authors:  W Muellbacher; U Ziemann; B Boroojerdi; M Hallett
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Subthreshold 5-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human primary motor cortex reduces intracortical paired-pulse inhibition.

Authors:  A Peinemann; C Lehner; C Mentschel; A Münchau; B Conrad; H R Siebner
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Preconditioning of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with transcranial direct current stimulation: evidence for homeostatic plasticity in the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Hartwig R Siebner; Nicolas Lang; Vincenzo Rizzo; Michael A Nitsche; Walter Paulus; Roger N Lemon; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-03-31       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Stimulation of the human motor cortex through the scalp.

Authors:  J C Rothwell; P D Thompson; B L Day; S Boyd; C D Marsden
Journal:  Exp Physiol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.969

6.  Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996.

Authors:  E M Wassermann
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-01

7.  Interaction between intracortical inhibition and facilitation in human motor cortex.

Authors:  U Ziemann; J C Rothwell; M C Ridding
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1996-11-01       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Preferential activation of different I waves by transcranial magnetic stimulation with a figure-of-eight-shaped coil.

Authors:  K Sakai; Y Ugawa; Y Terao; R Hanajima; T Furubayashi; I Kanazawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Focal stimulation of human cerebral cortex with the magnetic coil: a comparison with electrical stimulation.

Authors:  V E Amassian; R Q Cracco; P J Maccabee
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec

10.  Deleterious effects of prolonged electrical excitation of striate cortex in macaques.

Authors:  J R Bartlett; R W Doty; B B Lee; N Negrão; W H Overman
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 1.808

View more
  12 in total

1.  Magnetic stimulation of one-dimensional neuronal cultures.

Authors:  Assaf Rotem; Elisha Moses
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  A transcranial magnetic stimulator inducing near-rectangular pulses with controllable pulse width (cTMS).

Authors:  Angel V Peterchev; Reza Jalinous; Sarah H Lisanby
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Enhancement of Neuromodulation with Novel Pulse Shapes Generated by Controllable Pulse Parameter Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Stefan M Goetz; Bruce Luber; Sarah H Lisanby; David L K Murphy; I Cassie Kozyrkov; Warren M Grill; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 8.955

4.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulator with controllable pulse parameters.

Authors:  Angel V Peterchev; David L Murphy; Sarah H Lisanby
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 5.  Electroconvulsive therapy stimulus parameters: rethinking dosage.

Authors:  Angel V Peterchev; Moacyr A Rosa; Zhi-De Deng; Joan Prudic; Sarah H Lisanby
Journal:  J ECT       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.635

Review 6.  Consensus: New methodologies for brain stimulation.

Authors:  Ying-Zu Huang; Martin Sommer; Gary Thickbroom; Masashi Hamada; Alvero Pascual-Leonne; Walter Paulus; Joseph Classen; Angel V Peterchev; Abraham Zangen; Yoshikazu Ugawa
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 7.  Translational development strategy for magnetic seizure therapy.

Authors:  Stefan B Rowny; Karla Benzl; Sarah H Lisanby
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2009-04-05       Impact factor: 5.330

Review 8.  Plasticity-inducing TMS protocols to investigate somatosensory control of hand function.

Authors:  M Jacobs; A Premji; A J Nelson
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 3.599

9.  Solving the orientation specific constraints in transcranial magnetic stimulation by rotating fields.

Authors:  Assaf Rotem; Andreas Neef; Nicole E Neef; Andres Agudelo-Toro; David Rakhmilevitch; Walter Paulus; Elisha Moses
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Safety and recommendations for TMS use in healthy subjects and patient populations, with updates on training, ethical and regulatory issues: Expert Guidelines.

Authors:  Simone Rossi; Andrea Antal; Sven Bestmann; Marom Bikson; Carmen Brewer; Jürgen Brockmöller; Linda L Carpenter; Massimo Cincotta; Robert Chen; Jeff D Daskalakis; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro; Michael D Fox; Mark S George; Donald Gilbert; Vasilios K Kimiskidis; Giacomo Koch; Risto J Ilmoniemi; Jean Pascal Lefaucheur; Letizia Leocani; Sarah H Lisanby; Carlo Miniussi; Frank Padberg; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Walter Paulus; Angel V Peterchev; Angelo Quartarone; Alexander Rotenberg; John Rothwell; Paolo M Rossini; Emiliano Santarnecchi; Mouhsin M Shafi; Hartwig R Siebner; Yoshikatzu Ugawa; Eric M Wassermann; Abraham Zangen; Ulf Ziemann; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 4.861

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.