Literature DB >> 19465739

The cortical site of visual suppression by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

A Thielscher1, A Reichenbach, K Uğurbil, K Uludağ.   

Abstract

In visual suppression paradigms, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) applied approximately 90 ms after visual stimulus presentation over occipital visual areas can robustly interfere with visual perception, thereby most likely affecting feedback activity from higher areas (Amassian VE, Cracco RQ, Maccabee PJ, Cracco JB, Rudell A, Eberle L. 1989. Suppression of visual perception by magnetic coil stimulation of human occipital cortex. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 74:458-462.). It is speculated that the observed effects might stem primarily from the disruption of V1 activity. This hypothesis, although under debate, argues in favor of a special role of V1 in visual awareness. In this study, we combine TMS, functional magnetic resonance imaging, and calculation of the induced electric field to study the neural correlates of visual suppression. For parafoveal visual stimulation in the lower right half of the visual field, area V2d is shown to be the likely TMS target based on its anatomical location close to the skull surface. Furthermore, isolated stimulation of area V3 also results in robust visual suppression. Notably, V3 stimulation does not directly affect the feedback from higher visual areas that is relayed mainly via V2 to V1. These findings support the view that intact activity patterns in several early visual areas (rather than merely in V1) are likewise important for the perception of the stimulus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19465739      PMCID: PMC4810000          DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhp102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  52 in total

1.  Functional analysis of V3A and related areas in human visual cortex.

Authors:  R B Tootell; J D Mendola; N K Hadjikhani; P J Ledden; A K Liu; J B Reppas; M I Sereno; A M Dale
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Repression of unconscious information by conscious processing: evidence from affective blindsight induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Jacob Jolij; Victor A F Lamme
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-07-19       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Behavioral detection of electrical microstimulation in different cortical visual areas.

Authors:  Dona K Murphey; John H R Maunsell
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-04-26       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 4.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex.

Authors:  D J Felleman; D C Van Essen
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Magnetic stimulation of the nervous system: induced electric field in unbounded, semi-infinite, spherical, and cylindrical media.

Authors:  P Ravazzani; J Ruohonen; F Grandori; G Tognola
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  A model for the polarization of neurons by extrinsically applied electric fields.

Authors:  D Tranchina; C Nicholson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  In vitro magnetic stimulation of pig phrenic nerve with transverse and longitudinal induced electric fields: analysis of the stimulation site.

Authors:  Eugen R Lontis; Karsten Nielsen; Johannes J Struijk
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Induced deficits in speed perception by transcranial magnetic stimulation of human cortical areas V5/MT+ and V3A.

Authors:  Declan J McKeefry; Mark P Burton; Chara Vakrou; Brendan T Barrett; Anthony B Morland
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  The physiological basis of transcranial motor cortex stimulation in conscious humans.

Authors:  V Di Lazzaro; A Oliviero; F Pilato; E Saturno; M Dileone; P Mazzone; A Insola; P A Tonali; J C Rothwell
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the visual system. I. The psychophysics of visual suppression.

Authors:  Thomas Kammer; Klaas Puls; Hans Strasburger; N Jeremy Hill; Felix A Wichmann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  14 in total

1.  Is selective primary visual cortex stimulation achievable with TMS?

Authors:  Niina Salminen-Vaparanta; Valdas Noreika; Antti Revonsuo; Mika Koivisto; Simo Vanni
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Biophysical determinants of transcranial magnetic stimulation: effects of excitability and depth of targeted area.

Authors:  Mark G Stokes; Anthony T Barker; Martynas Dervinis; Frederick Verbruggen; Leah Maizey; Rachel C Adams; Christopher D Chambers
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Extinguishing Exogenous Attention via Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Antonio Fernández; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Phosphene-guided transcranial magnetic stimulation of occipital but not parietal cortex suppresses stimulus visibility.

Authors:  Evelina Tapia; Chiara Mazzi; Silvia Savazzi; Diane M Beck
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Occipital transcranial magnetic stimulation has an activity-dependent suppressive effect.

Authors:  Francesca Perini; Luigi Cattaneo; Marisa Carrasco; Jens V Schwarzbach
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Vivid visual mental imagery in the absence of the primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Holly Bridge; Stephen Harrold; Emily A Holmes; Mark Stokes; Christopher Kennard
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Contributions of the PPC to online control of visually guided reaching movements assessed with fMRI-guided TMS.

Authors:  Alexandra Reichenbach; Jean-Pierre Bresciani; Angelika Peer; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Axel Thielscher
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Enhanced awareness followed reversible inhibition of human visual cortex: a combined TMS, MRS and MEG study.

Authors:  Christopher P G Allen; Benjamin T Dunkley; Suresh D Muthukumaraswamy; Richard Edden; C John Evans; Petroc Sumner; Krish D Singh; Christopher D Chambers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The temporal dynamics of early visual cortex involvement in behavioral priming.

Authors:  Christianne Jacobs; Tom A de Graaf; Rainer Goebel; Alexander T Sack
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Is theta burst stimulation applied to visual cortex able to modulate peripheral visual acuity?

Authors:  Sabrina Brückner; Thomas Kammer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.