Literature DB >> 14634736

[CT-free image guided acetabulum navigation in clinical routine].

J Von Recum1, K Wendl, J Korber, A Wentzensen, P A Grützner.   

Abstract

After experimental and preclinical evaluation (HAP Paul Award 2001) of the CT-free image-guided surgical navigation system for acetabular cup placement (SurgiGATE C-arm cup" by Medivision, Switzerland), the system was introduced into clinical routine. The computation of the angular orientation of the cup is based on reference coordinates from the anterior pelvic plane concept. A hybrid strategy for pelvic landmark acquisition has been introduced involving percutaneous pointer-based digitization with the noninvasive biplanar landmark reconstruction using multiple registered fluoroscopy images. From January 2001 to December 2002, a total of 256 consecutive patients with primary osteoarthrosis (mean age 69 years, 161 male, 95 female, 132 left, and 124 right hip joints) were operated on with the hybrid CT-free navigation system. During each operation the angular orientation of the inserted implant was recorded. To determine the placement accuracy of the acetabular components, 50 consecutive patients underwent a CT scan 7-10 days postoperatively to analyze the cup position related to the anterior pelvic plane. This was all done blinded by the same investigator with the planning software of the CT-based navigation system of Medivision. There was no significant learning curve observed for the use of the system. The mean value for postoperative inclination was 43 degrees (SD 3.0, range: 37 degrees -49 degrees ) and for anteversion 19 degrees (SD 3.9, range: 10 degrees -28 degrees ). The resulting system accuracy, i.e., the difference between intraoperatively calculated cup orientation and postoperatively measured implant position showed a mean error of 1.5 degrees for the inclination (maximum 5 degrees, SD 1.1) and 2.4 degrees for the anteversion (maximum 6 degrees, SD 1.3). An accuracy of better than 5 degrees inclination and 6 degrees anteversion was achieved under clinical conditions, which implies that there is no significant difference in performance from the established CT-based navigation methods. Image-guided CT-free cup navigation provides a reliable solution for future THA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14634736     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-003-0681-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  18 in total

1.  A new approach to computer-aided spine surgery: fluoroscopy-based surgical navigation.

Authors:  L P Nolte; M A Slomczykowski; U Berlemann; M J Strauss; R Hofstetter; D Schlenzka; T Laine; T Lund
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The effect of acetabular cup orientations on limiting hip rotation.

Authors:  F J Kummer; S Shah; S Iyer; P E DiCesare
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  [Computer-assisted navigated acetabulum placement in hip prosthesis implantation--application study in routine clinical care].

Authors:  K Bernsmann; U Langlotz; B Ansari; M Wiese
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec

4.  Operative correction of an unstable total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  P J Daly; B F Morrey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Accuracy of intraoperative assessment of acetabular prosthesis placement.

Authors:  D M Hassan; G H Johnston; W N Dust; G Watson; A T Dolovich
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Acetabular cup-siting device for total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J Doyle; P Murray; P O Mahony; M Farmer; A C Hooper
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation.

Authors:  D W Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1993-03

8.  Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties.

Authors:  G E Lewinnek; J L Lewis; R Tarr; C L Compere; J R Zimmerman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Causes and prevention.

Authors:  D E McCollum; W J Gray
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Analysis of optimal range of socket orientations in total hip arthroplasty with use of computer-aided design simulation.

Authors:  M Seki; N Yuasa; K Ohkuni
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.494

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.