Literature DB >> 9730127

Fixation of acetabular cups without cement in total hip arthroplasty. A comparison of three different implant surfaces at a minimum duration of follow-up of five years.

M T Manley1, W N Capello, J A D'Antonio, A A Edidin, R G Geesink.   

Abstract

We evaluated 377 patients (428 hips) who had been managed, by a total of fourteen surgeons at twelve clinical sites in the United States and Europe, with a porous-coated press-fit acetabular cup, a hydroxyapatite-coated threaded screw-in cup, or one of two similar designs of hydroxyapatite-coated press-fit cups between April 1987 and November 1992. The same type of hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stem was inserted without cement in all patients. After a minimum duration of follow-up of five years (mean, 7.9 years; range, 5.3 to 9.1 years), one (1 per cent) of the 131 hydroxyapatite-coated threaded cups, two (2 per cent) of the 109 porous-coated press-fit cups, and twenty-one (11 per cent) of the 188 hydroxyapatite-coated press-fit cups had been revised because of aseptic loosening. A common radiographic sign of impending failure of the hydroxyapatite-coated press-fit cups was radiolucency at the interface between the implant and the subchondral bone beneath it. This radiolucency usually was seen initially more than two years after implantation. Radiographic evaluation of the 383 acetabular implants that were in situ at the time of the most recent follow-up showed that 123 (99 per cent) of the 124 hydroxyapatite-coated threaded cups, 101 (98 per cent) of the 103 porous-coated cups, and 139 (89 per cent) of the 156 hydroxyapatite-coated press-fit cups were stable with osseous ingrowth (as indicated by the absence of radiolucency at the interface and the absence of migration within the acetabulum). The probability of revision due to aseptic loosening was significantly greater for the hydroxyapatite-coated press-fit cups than it was for the hydroxyapatite-coated threaded cups or the porous-coated press-fit cups (p < 0.001 for both comparisons). Within the group of patients who had a hydroxyapatite-coated press-fit cup, the probability of revision due to aseptic loosening was significantly greater in association with a young age (p = 0.003), female gender (p = 0.02), the use of a femoral head with a diameter of thirty-two millimeters (p = 0.018), and the use of a thin polyethylene liner (p < 0.001). We found that the hydroxyapatite-coated threaded cups and the porous-coated press-fit cups continued to perform well more than five years after the operation. The hydroxyapatite-coated press-fit cups that were revised probably failed because the fixation interface beneath the cup could not sustain the tensile stresses that were imposed between the cup and the bone by the activity of the patient. Our data suggest that, in the specific biomechanical environment of the acetabulum, physical interlocking between the cup and the supporting bone beneath it may be a prerequisite for long-term stability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9730127     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199808000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  19 in total

1.  Effect of the initial implant fitting on the predicted secondary stability of a cementless stem.

Authors:  M Viceconti; A Pancanti; M Dotti; F Traina; L Cristofolini
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Fixation failures of dual mobility cups: a mid-term study of 2601 hip replacements.

Authors:  Philippe Massin; Vincent Orain; Rémi Philippot; Frederic Farizon; Michel Henry Fessy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Cementless acetabular revision: past, present, and future. Revision total hip arthroplasty: the acetabular side using cementless implants.

Authors:  Luis Pulido; Sridhar R Rachala; Miguel E Cabanela
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  All dual mobility cups are not the same.

Authors:  Thierry Aslanian
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  The evolution of outcomes and indications for the dual-mobility cup: a systematic review.

Authors:  Cécile Batailler; Camdon Fary; Régis Verdier; Thierry Aslanian; Jacques Caton; Sebastien Lustig
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  [Thirteen-year results for the CLS expansion cup in primary hip arthroplasty].

Authors:  D Kendoff; C Strobel; C Krettek; T Gerich
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  Case reports: fractures of threaded cups: rare complications of a well-established implant.

Authors:  Arnd T Hoburg; Manav Mehta; Stephan Tohtz; Carsten Perka
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-27       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Clinical and radiological results of hydroxyapatite-coated acetabular cups.

Authors:  J Blacha; J Gagała
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-08-14       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Vascularized fibular grafting for osteonecrosis of the femoral head with unusual indications.

Authors:  J Mack Aldridge; James R Urbaniak
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Increased risk of revision of acetabular cups coated with hydroxyapatite.

Authors:  Stergios Lazarinis; Johan Kärrholm; Nils P Hailer
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.