Literature DB >> 2463286

Projections of the cochlear nuclei and nucleus laminaris to the inferior colliculus of the barn owl.

T T Takahashi1, M Konishi.   

Abstract

The barn owl determines the directions from which sounds emanate by computing the interaural differences in the timing and intensity of sounds. These cues for sound localization are processed in independent channels originating at nucleus magnocellularis (NM) and nucleus angularis (NA), the cochlear nuclei. The cells of NM are specialized for encoding the phase of sounds in the ipsilateral ear. The cells of NA are specialized for encoding the intensity of sounds in the ipsilateral ear. NM projects solely, bilaterally, and tonotopically to nucleus laminaris (NL). NL and NA project to largely nonoverlapping zones in the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICc), thus forming hodological subdivisions in which time and intensity information may be processed. The terminal field of NL occupies a discrete zone in the rostromedial portion of the contralateral ICc, which we have termed the "core" of ICc. The terminal field of NA surrounds the core of ICc and thus forms a "shell" around it. The projection from NL to the core conserves tonotopy. Low-frequency regions of NL project to the dorsal portions of the core whereas higher-frequency regions project to more ventral portions. This innervation pattern is consistent with earlier physiological studies of tonotopy. Physiological studies have also suggested that NL and the core of ICs contain a representation of the location of a sound source along the horizontal axis. Our data suggest that the projection from NL to the core preserves spatiotopy. Thus, the dorsal portion of NL on the left, which contains a representation of eccentric loci in the right hemifield, innervates the area of the right ICc core that represents eccentric right loci. The more ventral portion of the left NL, which represents loci close to the vertical meridian, innervates the more rostral portions of the right core, which also represents loci near the vertical meridian.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2463286     DOI: 10.1002/cne.902740206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Neurol        ISSN: 0021-9967            Impact factor:   3.215


  48 in total

1.  A site of auditory experience-dependent plasticity in the neural representation of auditory space in the barn owl's inferior colliculus.

Authors:  J I Gold; E I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Cellular mechanisms for resolving phase ambiguity in the owl's inferior colliculus.

Authors:  J L Peña; M Konishi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Cochlear and neural delays for coincidence detection in owls.

Authors:  J L Pena; S Viete; K Funabiki; K Saberi; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Computational diversity in the cochlear nucleus angularis of the barn owl.

Authors:  Christine Köppl; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-12-27       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Differential patterns of inputs create functional zones in central nucleus of inferior colliculus.

Authors:  William C Loftus; Deborah C Bishop; Douglas L Oliver
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  How the owl tracks its prey--II.

Authors:  Terry T Takahashi
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Maps of interaural delay in the owl's nucleus laminaris.

Authors:  Catherine E Carr; Sahil Shah; Thomas McColgan; Go Ashida; Paula T Kuokkanen; Sandra Brill; Richard Kempter; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  GABAergic inhibition controls neural gain in inferior colliculus neurons sensitive to interaural time differences.

Authors:  Neil J Ingham; David McAlpine
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-06-29       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Behavioral guides for sensory neurophysiology.

Authors:  M Konishi
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  How the owl resolves auditory coding ambiguity.

Authors:  J A Mazer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.