Literature DB >> 15578170

Accuracy of spatial localization depending on head posture in a perturbed gravitoinertial force field.

J-M Prieur1, C Bourdin, J-L Vercher, F Sarès, J Blouin, G M Gauthier.   

Abstract

Spatial orientation is crucial when subjects have to accurately reach memorized visual targets. In previous studies modified gravitoinertial force fields were used to affect the accuracy of pointing movements in complete darkness without visual feedback of the moving limb. Target mislocalization was put forward as one hypothesis to explain this decrease in accuracy of pointing movements. The aim of this study was to test this hypothesis by determining the accuracy of spatial localization of memorized visual targets in a perturbed gravitoinertial force field. As head orientation is involved in localization tasks and carrying relevant sensory systems (visual, vestibular and neck muscle proprioceptive), we also tested the effect of head posture on the accuracy of localization. Subjects (n=10) were seated off-axis on a rotating platform (120 degrees s(-1)) in complete darkness with the head fixed (head-fixed session) or free to move (head-free session). They were required to report verbally the egocentric spatial localization of visual memorized targets. They gave the perceived target location in direction (i.e. left or right) and in amplitude (in centimeters) relative to the direction they thought to be straight ahead. Results showed that the accuracy of visual localization decreased when subjects were exposed to inertial forces. Moreover, subjects localized the memorized visual targets more to the right than their actual position, that was in the direction of the inertial forces. With further analysis, it appeared that this shift of localization was concomitant with a shift of the visual straight ahead (VSA) in the opposite direction. Thus, the modified gravitoinertial force field led to a modification in the orientation of the egocentric reference frame. Furthermore, this shift of localization increased when the head was free to move while the head was tilted in roll toward the center of rotation of the platform and turned in yaw in the same direction. It is concluded that the orientation of the egocentric reference frame was influenced by the gravitoinertial vector.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15578170     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-2087-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  29 in total

1.  Visual and proprioceptive shifts in perceived egocentric direction induced by eye-position.

Authors:  J Lewald; W H Ehrenstein
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Perception of slow pitch and roll body tilts in bilateral labyrinthine-defective subjects.

Authors:  Lionel Bringoux; Sébastien Schmerber; Vincent Nougier; Georges Dumas; Pierre Alain Barraud; Christian Raphel
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Perception of tilt (somatogravic illusion) in response to sustained linear acceleration during space flight.

Authors:  G Clément; S T Moore; T Raphan; B Cohen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Head positioning control in a gravito-inertial field and in normal gravity.

Authors:  Frédéric Sarès; Christophe Bourdin; Jean-Michel Prieur; Jean-Louis Vercher; Jean-Pierre Menu; Gabriel M Gauthier
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.435

5.  Transformation from head- to shoulder-centered representation of target direction in arm movements.

Authors:  J F Soechting; S I Tillery; M Flanders
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Performance of a simple aiming task in hypergravity: II. detailed response characteristics.

Authors:  O Bock; K E Arnold; B S Cheung
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  1996-02

7.  Perception of passive whole-body rotations in the absence of neck and body proprioception.

Authors:  J Blouin; J L Vercher; G M Gauthier; J Paillard; C Bard; Y Lamarre
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  The interactive contribution of neck muscle proprioception and vestibular stimulation to subjective "straight ahead" orientation in man.

Authors:  H O Karnath; D Sievering; M Fetter
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The contribution of coordinated eye and head movements in hand pointing accuracy.

Authors:  B Biguer; C Prablanc; M Jeannerod
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  In search of biased egocentric reference frames in neglect.

Authors:  A Farnè; F Ponti; E Làdavas
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  4 in total

1.  Difference in the perception of the horizon during true and simulated tilt in the absence of semicircular canal cues.

Authors:  Jérôme Carriot; Pierre-Alain Barraud; Vincent Nougier; Corinne Cian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The oculogyral illusion: retinal and oculomotor factors.

Authors:  Jerome Carriot; A Bryan; P DiZio; J R Lackner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-06       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Spatial updating and the maintenance of visual constancy.

Authors:  E M Klier; D E Angelaki
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Unilateral vestibular loss impairs external space representation.

Authors:  Liliane Borel; Christine Redon-Zouiteni; Pierre Cauvin; Michel Dumitrescu; Arnaud Devèze; Jacques Magnan; Patrick Péruch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.