Literature DB >> 15696309

Learning to throw on a rotating carousel: recalibration based on limb dynamics and projectile kinematics.

Hugo Bruggeman1, Herbert L Pick, John J Rieser.   

Abstract

Skilled actions exhibit adjustment in calibration to bring about their goals. The sought-after calibrations change as a function of the environmental situation that stages the actions. In these experiments participants sat on one side of a rotating carousel and threw beanbags underhanded at a target fixed on the opposite side. Logically, aimed throwing in this situation involves adjustment to fit changes in limb dynamics (originating from Coriolis forces) and changes in perceived projectile kinematics (originating from the tangential velocity of thrower and target). We studied whether such adjustment involved one or multiple components of recalibration. An initial experiment showed that exposure to rotation while throwing beanbags produced a robust recalibration in the direction of underhanded throws as manifest in throwing at stationary targets from a stationary position. Following some initial decay this recalibration persisted and approached an asymptote. Subsequent experiments suggested two independent components of recalibration. One is based on limb dynamics and accounts for the initial decay. The other is based on the perceived projectile kinematics and accounts for the stable change in throwing direction. These results raised the question of how multiple components of recalibration of an action are related. We propose that movement components are independent and calibrated separately at different levels in the organization of an action.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15696309     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-2163-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  18 in total

1.  Composition and decomposition of internal models in motor learning under altered kinematic and dynamic environments.

Authors:  J R Flanagan; E Nakano; H Imamizu; R Osu; T Yoshioka; M Kawato
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching.

Authors:  J W Krakauer; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Kinematics and dynamics are not represented independently in motor working memory: evidence from an interference study.

Authors:  Christine Tong; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Kinematics of wrist joint flexion in overarm throws made by skilled subjects.

Authors:  D B Debicki; P L Gribble; S Watts; J Hore
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-11-04       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  An outline of a theory of action systems.

Authors:  E S Reed
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 1.328

6.  Temporal and amplitude generalization in motor learning.

Authors:  S J Goodbody; D M Wolpert
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Motor adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of reaching movements: endpoint but not trajectory adaptation transfers to the nonexposed arm.

Authors:  P Dizio; J R Lackner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  The motor system does not learn the dynamics of the arm by rote memorization of past experience.

Authors:  M A Conditt; F Gandolfo; F A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Alternating prism exposure causes dual adaptation and generalization to a novel displacement.

Authors:  R B Welch; B Bridgeman; S Anand; K E Browman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-08

10.  Calibration of human locomotion and models of perceptual-motor organization.

Authors:  J J Rieser; H L Pick; D H Ashmead; A E Garing
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  3 in total

1.  Rapid recalibration based on optic flow in visually guided action.

Authors:  Brett R Fajen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Action potential influences spatial perception: Evidence for genuine top-down effects on perception.

Authors:  Jessica K Witt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

3.  Duck! Scaling the height of a horizontal barrier to body height.

Authors:  Jeanine K Stefanucci; Michael N Geuss
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.199

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.