Literature DB >> 17562026

Vestibular contribution to the planning of reach trajectories.

Christopher J Bockisch1, Thomas Haslwanter.   

Abstract

Reaching for an object while simultaneously rotating induces Coriolis and centrifugal inertial forces on the arm that require compensatory actions to maintain accuracy. We investigated whether the nervous system uses vestibular signals of head rotation to predict inertial forces. Human subjects reached in darkness to a remembered target 33 cm distant. Subjects were stationary, but experienced a strong vestibular rotation signal. We achieved this by rotating subjects at 360 degrees /s in yaw for 2 min and then stopping, and subjects reached during the 'post-rotary' period when the deceleration is interpreted by the vestibular system as a rotation in the opposite direction. Arm trajectories were straight in control trials without a rotary stimulus. With vestibular stimulation, trajectory curvature increased an average of 3 cm in the direction of the vestibular stimulation (e.g., to the right for a rightward yaw stimulus). Vestibular-induced curvature returned rapidly to normal, with an average time constant of 6 s. Movements also became longer as the vestibular stimulus diminished, and returned towards normal length with an average time constant of 5.6 s. In a second experiment we compared reaching with preferred and non-preferred hands, and found that they were similarly affected by vestibular stimulation. The reach curvatures were in the expected direction if the nervous system anticipated and attempted to counteract the presence of Coriolis forces based on the vestibular signals. Similarly, the shorter reaches may have occurred because the nervous system was attempting to compensate for an expected centrifugal force. Since vestibular stimulation also alters the perceived location of targets, vestibular signals probably influence all stages of the sensorimotor pathway transforming the desired goal of a reach into specific motor-unit innervation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17562026     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-0997-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  45 in total

Review 1.  The contributions of vestibular signals to the representations of space in the posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  R A Andersen; K V Shenoy; L H Snyder; D C Bradley; J A Crowell
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1999-05-28       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Differences in control of limb dynamics during dominant and nondominant arm reaching.

Authors:  R L Sainburg; D Kalakanis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Reaching during virtual rotation: context specific compensations for expected coriolis forces.

Authors:  J V Cohn; P DiZio; J R Lackner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-11-22       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Handedness: dominant arm advantages in control of limb dynamics.

Authors:  Leia B Bagesteiro; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Cortical control of reaching movements.

Authors:  J F Kalaska; S H Scott; P Cisek; L E Sergio
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 6.627

7.  Cortical networks for visual reaching: physiological and anatomical organization of frontal and parietal lobe arm regions.

Authors:  P B Johnson; S Ferraina; L Bianchi; R Caminiti
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Control of limb dynamics in normal subjects and patients without proprioception.

Authors:  R L Sainburg; M F Ghilardi; H Poizner; C Ghez
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Dynamic interactions between limb segments during planar arm movement.

Authors:  M J Hollerbach; T Flash
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.086

10.  Functional MRI of galvanic vestibular stimulation.

Authors:  E Lobel; J F Kleine; D L Bihan; A Leroy-Willig; A Berthoz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  11 in total

1.  Task-dependent vestibular feedback responses in reaching.

Authors:  Johannes Keyser; W Pieter Medendorp; Luc P J Selen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  The vestibular system: multimodal integration and encoding of self-motion for motor control.

Authors:  Kathleen E Cullen
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 13.837

3.  Role of Rostral Fastigial Neurons in Encoding a Body-Centered Representation of Translation in Three Dimensions.

Authors:  Christophe Z Martin; Jessica X Brooks; Andrea M Green
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Internal models and neural computation in the vestibular system.

Authors:  Andrea M Green; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Diverse spatial reference frames of vestibular signals in parietal cortex.

Authors:  Xiaodong Chen; Gregory C Deangelis; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Combined influence of visual scene and body tilt on arm pointing movements: gravity matters!

Authors:  Cécile Scotto Di Cesare; Fabrice R Sarlegna; Christophe Bourdin; Daniel R Mestre; Lionel Bringoux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Grip Force Adjustments Reflect Prediction of Dynamic Consequences in Varying Gravitoinertial Fields.

Authors:  Olivier White; Jean-Louis Thonnard; Philippe Lefèvre; Joachim Hermsdörfer
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Coherent Multimodal Sensory Information Allows Switching between Gravitoinertial Contexts.

Authors:  Marie Barbiero; Célia Rousseau; Charalambos Papaxanthis; Olivier White
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  Effects of underestimating the kinematics of trunk rotation on simultaneous reaching movements: predictions of a biomechanical model.

Authors:  Martin Simoneau; Étienne Guillaud; Jean Blouin
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Biases in the perception of self-motion during whole-body acceleration and deceleration.

Authors:  Luc Tremblay; Andrew Kennedy; Dany Paleressompoulle; Liliane Borel; Laurence Mouchnino; Jean Blouin
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.