Literature DB >> 17019645

Rapid hybridization probe assay and PCR for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urinary tract infections: a prospective study.

Maysaa El-Sayed1, Wafaa Badwy, Adel Bakr.   

Abstract

Chlamydia trachomatis is a widespread bacterium that causes trachoma and genital tract infections in humans. The fact that the growth of this pathogen does not normally occur outside living cells poses a challenge in its diagnosis. The present study aimed to compare the efficacies of different molecular and cultural methods in the detection of C. trachomatis in urine samples collected from patients with urinary tract infections. Examined detection methods involved the Gen-Probe C. trachomatis (GP-CT) assay, direct antigen detection by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method. The efficacies of these methods were compared to that of the cell culture technique depending on sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. C. trachomatis was detected in 25 out of 50 (50%) of examined urine samples using the cell culture method. Compared with this standard technique, the GP-CT assay was the most sensitive procedure, being able to detect the pathogen in all positive samples, followed by PCR and ELISA, which showed 60% and 40% sensitivities, respectively. PCR and ELISA displayed the highest level of specificity (100%) compared to the cell culture method with the GP-CT assay showing 40% specificity. The rate of accuracy was comparable between the GP-CT, PCR, and ELISA methods ranging from 70-80% of the accuracy of the cell culture method. The above results suggest that C. trachomatis is a frequent pathogen associated with upper and lower urinary tract infections. Both the GP-CT assay and PCR method can be recommended as reliable detection methods for C. trachomatis, and the GP-CT can be used as a screening tool.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17019645     DOI: 10.1007/s00284-005-0449-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Microbiol        ISSN: 0343-8651            Impact factor:   2.188


  20 in total

1.  Population-based genetic and evolutionary analysis of Chlamydia trachomatis urogenital strain variation in the United States.

Authors:  Kim Millman; Carolyn M Black; Robert E Johnson; Walter E Stamm; Robert B Jones; Edward W Hook; David H Martin; Gail Bolan; Simon Tavaré; Deborah Dean
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Comparison of three commercially available amplification assays, AMP CT, LCx, and COBAS AMPLICOR, for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in first-void urine.

Authors:  W H Goessens; J W Mouton; W I van der Meijden; S Deelen; T H van Rijsoort-Vos; N Lemmens-den Toom; H A Verbrugh; R P Verkooyen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine samples by polymerase chain reaction and enzyme immunoassay.

Authors:  Y F Ngeow; V Hema; M Zakaria; C H Lee; S Ramachandran
Journal:  Malays J Pathol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 0.656

4.  Effect of swab type and storage temperature on the isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis from clinical specimens.

Authors:  J B Mahony; M A Chernesky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in asymptomatic women in Hungary. An epidemiological and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  T Nyári; C Nyári; M Woodward; G Mészáros; J Deák; E Nagy; L Kovács
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.636

6.  Effect of patient characteristics on performance of an enzyme immunoassay for detecting cervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection.

Authors:  L S Magder; K C Klontz; L H Bush; R C Barnes
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis cervical infection by urine tests among adolescents clinics.

Authors:  C M Beck-Sague; C E Farshy; T K Jackson; L Guillory; D Edelkind; J C Bullard; E A Urdez; B Jones; K Francis; A Sievert; S A Morse; C M Black
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 5.012

8.  Comparison of three nucleic acid amplification tests for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens.

Authors:  Charlotte A Gaydos; Mellisa Theodore; Nicholas Dalesio; Billie Jo Wood; Thomas C Quinn
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Performance of transcription-mediated amplification and ligase chain reaction assays for detection of chlamydial infection in urogenital samples obtained by invasive and noninvasive methods.

Authors:  A Stary; E Schuh; M Kerschbaumer; B Götz; H Lee
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Evaluation of chlamydiazyme enzyme immunoassay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from men.

Authors:  J M Ehret; J C Leszcynski; J M Douglas; S L Genova; M A Chernesky; J Moncada; J Schachter
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Direct Semi-Quantitative Detection of 18 Pathogens and Simultaneous Screening for Nine Resistance Genes in Clinical Urine Samples by a High-Throughput Multiplex Genetic Detection System.

Authors:  Zhaoyang Sun; Wenjian Liu; Jinghao Zhang; Su Wang; Feng Yang; Yi Fang; Wenrong Jiang; Li Ding; Hu Zhao; Yanmei Zhang
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 5.293

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.