Literature DB >> 8735088

Diagnosis by AMPLICOR PCR of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in urine samples from women and men attending sexually transmitted disease clinics.

T C Quinn1, L Welsh, A Lentz, K Crotchfelt, J Zenilman, J Newhall, C Gaydos.   

Abstract

Screening of urine specimens from men for Chlamydia trachomatis infection by a commercial PCR assay (AMPLICOR C. trachomatis Test; Roche Diagnostic Systems, Inc., Branchburg, N.J.) is a sensitive and specific noninvasive diagnostic assay. Since screening of women for C. trachomatis infection with the AMPLICOR C. trachomatis Test has been limited to use with endocervical swab specimens, we conducted an evaluation of the AMPLICOR C. trachomatis Test for the detection of C. trachomatis using female urine samples and compared the results of those obtained by in vitro culture and PCR of endocervical swab specimens. For 713 men we compared the performance of AMPLICOR C. trachomatis Test with urine specimens with that of culture of urethral specimens. For specimens that were PCR positive and culture negative, two additional tests were used to resolve the discrepancies: direct fluorescent-antibody assay (DFA) of sediment from a spun endocervical specimen culture vial and major outer membrane protein-based PCR of the sediment from the endocervical specimen culture vial. Of 525 urine specimens from females, 67 (12.8%) were PCR positive, and 41 (7.8%) endocervical specimens from the 525 women were culture positive. After resolution of the discrepancies, the resolved sensitivity of the urine PCR was 93.3%, whereas the sensitivity of endocervical swab specimen culture was 67.3%. Of 468 female endocervical swab specimens, 47 (10.0%) had a positive PCR result and 33 (7.0%) were culture positive. The resolved sensitivity of the endocervical swab specimen PCR was 86%. Of 415 matched female urine and endocervical swab specimens, there were 49 confirmed infections; 30 (61.2%) specimens were positive by culture of the endocervical swab specimen, 40 (81.6%) were positive by confirmed endocervical swab specimen PCR, 43 (87.8%) were positive by confirmed urine PCR, and all 49 (100%) were positive by either endocervical swab specimen PCR or urine PCR. For men, the resolved sensitivity of the urine PCR was 88%, and the sensitivity of culture was only 50.7%. These results indicate that urine PCR is highly sensitive for the detection of C. trachomatis in both women and men and provides a noninvasive technique for routine screening for chlamydial infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8735088      PMCID: PMC229032          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.34.6.1401-1406.1996

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  37 in total

1.  Why we need a program for the control of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  J Schachter
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-03-23       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Comparison of a fluorescent monoclonal antibody assay and a tissue culture assay for routine detection of infections caused by Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  J H Larsen; H C Wulf; A Friis-Møller
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Effect of swab type and storage temperature on the isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis from clinical specimens.

Authors:  J B Mahony; M A Chernesky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigens in urine as an alternative to swabs and cultures.

Authors:  M Chernesky; S Castriciano; J Sellors; I Stewart; I Cunningham; S Landis; W Seidelman; L Grant; C Devlin; J Mahony
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 5.226

5.  Chlamydia trachomatis in cervicitis and urethritis in women.

Authors:  J Paavonen; E Vesterinen
Journal:  Scand J Infect Dis Suppl       Date:  1982

6.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in urine samples from men and women by ligase chain reaction.

Authors:  G J van Doornum; M Buimer; M Prins; C J Henquet; R A Coutinho; P K Plier; S Tomazic-Allen; H Hu; H Lee
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Chlamydial infections of the urethra in women.

Authors:  M G Bradley; D Hobson; N Lee; I A Tait; E Rees
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1985-12

8.  Chlamydia trachomatis infections in the United States. What are they costing us?

Authors:  A E Washington; R E Johnson; L L Sanders
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987-04-17       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis genitourinary infections.

Authors:  W E Stamm
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 10.  Laboratory diagnosis of human chlamydial infections.

Authors:  R C Barnes
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 26.132

View more
  35 in total

1.  Diagnosing genitourinary chlamydial infection. Vaginal swabs alone may not be sufficient.

Authors:  M H Wilcox; D Subramanian
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-09-01

2.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by strand displacement amplification and relevance of the amplification control for use with vaginal swab specimens.

Authors:  Lisa A Cosentino; Daniel V Landers; Sharon L Hillier
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Volume effect on sensitivity of nucleic acid amplification tests for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from females.

Authors:  Jeanne Moncada; Joan M Chow; Julius Schachter
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Comparison of three commercially available amplification assays, AMP CT, LCx, and COBAS AMPLICOR, for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in first-void urine.

Authors:  W H Goessens; J W Mouton; W I van der Meijden; S Deelen; T H van Rijsoort-Vos; N Lemmens-den Toom; H A Verbrugh; R P Verkooyen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Evaluation of the Gen-Probe Chlamydia trachomatis transcription-mediated amplification assay with urine specimens from women.

Authors:  R Pasternack; P Vuorinen; A Miettinen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  Chlamydia screening: which sample for which technique?

Authors:  A Stary
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1997-04

7.  Prevalence of chlamydia and gonorrhoea among a population of men who have sex with men.

Authors:  R L Cook; K St George; A J Silvestre; S A Riddler; M Lassak; C R Rinaldo
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.519

8.  Comparison of performances of two commercially available tests, a PCR assay and a ligase chain reaction test, in detection of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection.

Authors:  M Puolakkainen; E Hiltunen-Back; T Reunala; S Suhonen; P Lähteenmäki; M Lehtinen; J Paavonen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Comparison of three nucleic acid amplification tests for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens.

Authors:  Charlotte A Gaydos; Mellisa Theodore; Nicholas Dalesio; Billie Jo Wood; Thomas C Quinn
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Performance of transcription-mediated amplification and ligase chain reaction assays for detection of chlamydial infection in urogenital samples obtained by invasive and noninvasive methods.

Authors:  A Stary; E Schuh; M Kerschbaumer; B Götz; H Lee
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.