Literature DB >> 9645178

Preventing disability from work-related low-back pain. New evidence gives new hope--if we can just get all the players onside.

J Frank1, S Sinclair, S Hogg-Johnson, H Shannon, C Bombardier, D Beaton, D Cole.   

Abstract

Despite the publication in the mid-1990s of comprehensive practice guidelines for the management of acute low-back pain, both in the United States and elsewhere, this ubiquitous health problem continues to be the main cause of workers' compensation claims in much of the Western world. This paper represents a synthesis of the intervention studies published in the last 4 years and is based on a new approach to categorizing these studies that emphasizes the stage or phase of back pain at the time of intervention and the site or agent of the intervention. Current thinking suggests that medical management in the first 3-4 weeks after the onset of pain should be generally conservative. Several studies of rather heterogeneous interventions focusing on return to work and implemented in the subacute stage (3-4 to 12 weeks after the onset of pain) have shown important reductions in time lost from work (by 30% to 50%). There is substantial evidence indicating that employers who promptly offer appropriately modified duties can reduce time lost per episode of back pain by at least 30%, with frequent spin-off effects on the incidence of new back-pain claims as well. Finally, newer studies of guidelines-based approaches to back pain in the workplace suggest that a combination of all these approaches, in a coordinated workplace-linked care system, can achieve a reduction of 50% in time lost due to back pain, at no extra cost and, in some settings, with significant savings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9645178      PMCID: PMC1229415     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  35 in total

1.  The treatment of acute low back pain--bed rest, exercises, or ordinary activity?

Authors:  A Malmivaara; U Häkkinen; T Aro; M L Heinrichs; L Koskenniemi; E Kuosma; S Lappi; R Paloheimo; C Servo; V Vaaranen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-02-09       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  The effectiveness of chiropractic for treatment of low back pain: an update and attempt at statistical pooling.

Authors:  W J Assendelft; B W Koes; G J van der Heijden; L M Bouter
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.437

3.  The efficacy of back schools: a review of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  B W Koes; M W van Tulder; W M van der Windt; L M Bouter
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Good prognosis for low back pain when left untampered. A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  A Indahl; L Velund; O Reikeraas
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Early intervention for back-injured nurses at a large Canadian tertiary care hospital: an evaluation of the effectiveness and cost benefits of a two-year pilot project.

Authors:  A Yassi; R Tate; J E Cooper; C Snow; S Vallentyne; J B Khokhar
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 1.611

6.  Effect of an early intervention program on the relationship between subjective pain and disability measures in nurses with low back injury.

Authors:  J E Cooper; R B Tate; A Yassi; J Khokhar
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  A randomized trial of exercise therapy in patients with acute low back pain. Efficacy on sickness absence.

Authors:  A Faas; J T van Eijk; A W Chavannes; J W Gubbels
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  The outcomes and costs of care for acute low back pain among patients seen by primary care practitioners, chiropractors, and orthopedic surgeons. The North Carolina Back Pain Project.

Authors:  T S Carey; J Garrett; A Jackman; C McLaughlin; J Fryer; D R Smucker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-10-05       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Management of occupational back pain: the Sherbrooke model. Results of a pilot and feasibility study.

Authors:  P Loisel; P Durand; L Abenhaim; L Gosselin; R Simard; J Turcotte; J M Esdaile
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.402

10.  Conservative treatment of acute low back pain. A 5-year follow-up study of two methods of treatment.

Authors:  R Stankovic; O Johnell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  70 in total

1.  The silent payer speaks: workers' compensation boards and Canadian physicians.

Authors:  M Campolieti; J N Lavis
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-04-18       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Neck pain.

Authors:  David Etlin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-01-08       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Rheumatology: 13. Minimizing disability in patients with low-back pain.

Authors:  P C Wing
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Views of laypersons on the role employers play in return to work when sick-listed.

Authors:  Cecilia Nordqvist; Christina Holmqvist; Kristina Alexanderson
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2003-03

5.  Early prognostic factors for duration on temporary total benefits in the first year among workers with compensated occupational soft tissue injuries.

Authors:  S Hogg-Johnson; D C Cole
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 6.  Readiness for return to work following injury or illness: conceptualizing the interpersonal impact of health care, workplace, and insurance factors.

Authors:  Renée-Louise Franche; Niklas Krause
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2002-12

7.  Cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis of a disability prevention model for back pain management: a six year follow up study.

Authors:  P Loisel; J Lemaire; S Poitras; M-J Durand; F Champagne; S Stock; B Diallo; C Tremblay
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 8.  Occupational health guidelines for the management of low back pain: an international comparison.

Authors:  J B Staal; H Hlobil; M W van Tulder; G Waddell; A K Burton; B W Koes; W van Mechelen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.402

9.  Modelling return-to-work intervention strategies: a method to help target interventions.

Authors:  Catelijne Joling; Peter P M Janssen; Wim Groot
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2004-03

Review 10.  Management of long term sickness absence: a systematic realist review.

Authors:  Angela Higgins; Peter O'Halloran; Sam Porter
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2012-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.