Literature DB >> 7747231

Conservative treatment of acute low back pain. A 5-year follow-up study of two methods of treatment.

R Stankovic1, O Johnell.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized trial.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the McKenzie method of treatment of acute low back pain with patient education in "mini back school" after 5 years; the 1-year results have already been published. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The 5-year results after the initial treatment are presented in this study of 89 subjects. Included in the study were 22 women and 67 men with an average age of 39.6 +/- 10.5 years (range 22-66 years).
METHODS: Sixty-two subjects (70%) were interviewed by telephone, while the remaining 27 subjects (30%) were examined and interviewed personally. Information of sick leave was obtained from the Swedish National Health Insurance Office.
RESULTS: The results showed that subjects who received treatment according to the McKenzie principle 5 years earlier had significantly less recurrences of pain and fewer were on sick leave compared with the subjects who received education in mini back school. The other variables did not show any statistically significant differences.
CONCLUSIONS: The difference between the two treatments was much less after 5 years compared with the 1-year results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7747231     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199502001-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  9 in total

Review 1.  Low back pain: which is the best way forward?

Authors:  A Samanta; J Beardsley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-04-24

Review 2.  Outcome of non-invasive treatment modalities on back pain: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Maurits W van Tulder; Bart Koes; Antti Malmivaara
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Exercises for prevention of recurrences of low-back pain.

Authors:  Brian Kl Choi; Jos H Verbeek; Wilson Wai-San Tam; Johnny Y Jiang
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20

Review 4.  How do we define the condition 'recurrent low back pain'? A systematic review.

Authors:  Tasha R Stanton; Jane Latimer; Chris G Maher; Mark J Hancock
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Low back pain (acute).

Authors:  Greg McIntosh; Hamilton Hall
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2011-05-09

6.  The effects of McKenzie and Brunkow exercise program on spinal mobility comparative study.

Authors:  Emela Mujić Skikić; Suad Trebinjac; Slavica Sakota; Dijana Avdić
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.363

Review 7.  Low back pain (acute).

Authors:  Hamilton Hall; Greg McIntosh
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2008-10-03

8.  The Effect of Harmonic Technique vs End Range Loading Exercises on Pain and Disability in Patients With Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Amir Massoud Arab; Heidar Saadati; Rahman Sheikhhoseini
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2016-03-25

Review 9.  Preventing disability from work-related low-back pain. New evidence gives new hope--if we can just get all the players onside.

Authors:  J Frank; S Sinclair; S Hogg-Johnson; H Shannon; C Bombardier; D Beaton; D Cole
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-06-16       Impact factor: 8.262

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.