Literature DB >> 12611027

Views of laypersons on the role employers play in return to work when sick-listed.

Cecilia Nordqvist1, Christina Holmqvist, Kristina Alexanderson.   

Abstract

Sickness absenteeism is an increasing public health problem, but few studies have examined the views of laypersons regarding factors that promote return to work. The present investigation concerns the opinions of such individuals on the role employers play in this context. Data from five focus-group interviews of laypersons with experience of long-term sickness absence were subjected to grounded theory analysis. When asked about factors that hinder or promote return to work, the laypersons spontaneously emphasized the importance of the employer. Specifically, they stressed the need for a structured back-to-work program at each workplace, which should include contacting absent employees and informing fellow workers of possible changes in task assignments upon return of the absent person. Reported hindering factors included lack of such information, leading to envy and harassment. Respondents also asserted the importance of work supervisors in creating a positive emotional atmosphere.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12611027     DOI: 10.1023/a:1021841722613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  20 in total

1.  Workplace changes in successful rehabilitation.

Authors:  K Ekberg
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1995-12

2.  Public health research and lay knowledge.

Authors:  J Popay; G Williams
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Aggressive early medical management by a specialist in physical medicine and rehabilitation: effect on lost time due to injuries in hospital employees.

Authors:  A J Haig; P Linton; M McIntosh; L Moneta; P B Mead
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1990-03

Review 4.  Work factors and upper limb disorders.

Authors:  P W Buckle
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-11-22

5.  Successful return to work following a musculoskeletal injury.

Authors:  P Peters
Journal:  AAOHN J       Date:  1990-06

6.  Predictive factors for disability pension--an 11-year follow up of young persons on sick leave due to neck, shoulder, or back diagnoses.

Authors:  K Borg; G Hensing; K Alexanderson
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.021

7.  "It was really nice to have someone"--lay people with musculoskeletal disorders request supportive relationships in rehabilitation.

Authors:  G Ostlund; E Cedersund; K Alexanderson; G Hensing
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.021

Review 8.  Rehabilitation of acute and subacute low back and neck pain in the work-injured patient.

Authors:  C Hartigan; L Miller; S C Liewehr
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.472

Review 9.  Preventing disability from work-related low-back pain. New evidence gives new hope--if we can just get all the players onside.

Authors:  J Frank; S Sinclair; S Hogg-Johnson; H Shannon; C Bombardier; D Beaton; D Cole
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-06-16       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Gender trends in sick-listing with musculoskeletal symptoms in a Swedish county during a period of rapid increase in sickness absence.

Authors:  M Leijon; G Hensing; K Alexanderson
Journal:  Scand J Soc Med       Date:  1998-09
View more
  28 in total

1.  Shame-inducing encounters. Negative emotional aspects of sickness-absentees' interactions with rehabilitation professionals.

Authors:  Tommy Svensson; Agneta Karlsson; Kristina Alexanderson; Cecilia Nordqvist
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2003-09

2.  Employee perspectives on the role of supervisors to prevent workplace disability after injuries.

Authors:  William S Shaw; Michelle M Robertson; Glenn Pransky; Robert K McLellan
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2003-09

3.  How can the rehabilitation planning process at the workplace be improved? A qualitative study from employers' perspective.

Authors:  Agneta Larsson; Gunvor Gard
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2003-09

4.  The effect of recalled previous work environment on return to work after a rehabilitation program including vocational aspects for trauma patients.

Authors:  Pierluigi Ballabeni; Cyrille Burrus; François Luthi; Charles Gobelet; Olivier Dériaz
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2011-03

5.  Prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders: the challenge of implementing evidence.

Authors:  Patrick Loisel; Rachelle Buchbinder; Rowland Hazard; Robert Keller; Inger Scheel; Maurits van Tulder; Barbara Webster
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-12

Review 6.  Work-related outcome assessment instruments.

Authors:  Achim Elfering
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Workers' beliefs and expectations affect return to work over 12 months.

Authors:  Martijn W Heymans; Henrica C W de Vet; Dirk L Knol; Paulien M Bongers; Bart W Koes; Willem van Mechelen
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2006-12

8.  Return to work in a cohort of low back pain patients: development and validation of a clinical prediction rule.

Authors:  Martijn W Heymans; Johannes R Anema; Stef van Buuren; Dirk L Knol; Willem van Mechelen; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2009-02-18

9.  Experience of the implementation of a multi-stakeholder return-to-work programme.

Authors:  Asa Tjulin; Elinor Edvardsson Stiwne; Kerstin Ekberg
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2009-12

10.  Workplace Social System and Sustained Return-to-Work: A Study of Supervisor and Co-worker Supportiveness and Injury Reaction.

Authors:  Arif Jetha; Anthony D LaMontagne; Rebbecca Lilley; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson; Malcolm Sim; Peter Smith
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2018-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.