Literature DB >> 7951791

Management of occupational back pain: the Sherbrooke model. Results of a pilot and feasibility study.

P Loisel1, P Durand, L Abenhaim, L Gosselin, R Simard, J Turcotte, J M Esdaile.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to combat occurrence of chronic occupational back pain.
METHODS: A multidisciplinary model to manage back pain that includes both clinical and ergonomic approaches has been developed. Early detection, early clinical and ergonomic evaluations, and early active treatment make up the cornerstone of management. Detection of cases starts after four weeks of absence from work. An ergonomic intervention is implemented at six weeks. A medical specialist is involved at eight weeks. If return to work is not possible after 12 weeks, a functional recovery therapy followed by a therapeutic return to work is implemented. A multidisciplinary team decides if return to original or modified work is possible or if vocational rehabilitation is necessary. This model has been implemented by the investigators in the Sherbrooke (Quebec, Canada) area, and is presently being evaluated through a randomised trial in 31 industrial settlements (about 20,000 workers). A cluster randomisation of industries and workers will allow separate testing of ergonomic and clinical interventions.
RESULTS: One year after implementation, 31 of 35 of the eligible industrial sites participated in the study and 79 of 88 of the eligible workers affected by recent back pain had agreed to participate. Ergonomic and clinical interventions have been implemented as planned. Only three workers dropped out. Hence this global clinical and ergonomic management programme has been shown to be feasible in a general population.
CONCLUSION: A global management programme of back pain joining ergonomic and clinical intervention with a multidisciplinary approach has not been tested yet. Linking these two strategies in a same multidisciplinary team represents a systemic approach to this multifactorial ailment. During the first year of this trial we did not find any conflict between these two interventions from the employer's or worker's point of view.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7951791      PMCID: PMC1128053          DOI: 10.1136/oem.51.9.597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  29 in total

1.  Pending litigation and rehabilitation outcome of chronic back pain.

Authors:  P Trief; N Stein
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 3.966

2.  Program for increasing health and physical fitness of fire fighters.

Authors:  L D Cady; P C Thomas; R J Karwasky
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1985-02

3.  An investigation of the problem of sick-leave in the patient suffering from low back pain.

Authors:  A Magora; I Taustein
Journal:  IMS Ind Med Surg       Date:  1969-11

4.  Chronic low-back pain, psychologic distress, and illness behavior.

Authors:  G Waddell; C J Main; E W Morris; M Di Paola; I C Gray
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Industrial low-back pain. A prospective evaluation of a standardized diagnostic and treatment protocol.

Authors:  S W Wiesel; H L Feffer; R H Rothman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Introduction to sample size determination and power analysis for clinical trials.

Authors:  J M Lachin
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1981-06

7.  Predicting return to work for lower back pain patients receiving worker's compensation.

Authors:  J Lancourt; M Kettelhut
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 8.  Newest knowledge of low back pain. A critical look.

Authors:  A L Nachemson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Acute, subacute and chronic low back pain: clinical symptoms, absenteeism and working environment.

Authors:  B Vällfors
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl       Date:  1985

10.  Low-back pain in 40- to 47-year-old men: work history and work environment factors.

Authors:  H O Svensson; G B Andersson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  32 in total

Review 1.  Readiness for return to work following injury or illness: conceptualizing the interpersonal impact of health care, workplace, and insurance factors.

Authors:  Renée-Louise Franche; Niklas Krause
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2002-12

2.  Cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis of a disability prevention model for back pain management: a six year follow up study.

Authors:  P Loisel; J Lemaire; S Poitras; M-J Durand; F Champagne; S Stock; B Diallo; C Tremblay
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  A communitywide intervention to improve outcomes and reduce disability among injured workers in Washington State.

Authors:  Thomas M Wickizer; Gary M Franklin; Robert D Mootz; Deborah Fulton-Kehoe; Roy Plaeger-Brockway; Diana Drylie; Judith A Turner; Terri Smith-Weller
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.911

4.  Implementation of a coordinated and tailored return-to-work intervention for employees with mental health problems.

Authors:  Marie H T Martin; Maj Britt D Nielsen; Signe M A Petersen; Louise M Jakobsen; Reiner Rugulies
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2012-09

5.  Interorganizational collaboration in occupational rehabilitation: perceptions of an interdisciplinary rehabilitation team.

Authors:  Patrick Loisel; Marie-José Durand; Raymond Baril; Julie Gervais; Marlène Falardeau
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-12

Review 6.  Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: a systematic review of the quantitative literature.

Authors:  Renée-Louise Franche; Kimberley Cullen; Judy Clarke; Emma Irvin; Sandra Sinclair; John Frank
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-12

Review 7.  Workplace interventions for workers with musculoskeletal disabilities: a descriptive review of content.

Authors:  M J Durand; N Vézina; P Loisel; R Baril; M C Richard; B Diallo
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2007-03

8.  Economic evaluation of a multi-stage return to work program for workers on sick-leave due to low back pain.

Authors:  Ivan A Steenstra; Johannes R Anema; Maurits W van Tulder; Paulien M Bongers; Henrica C W de Vet; Willem van Mechelen
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2006-12

9.  Workplace Social System and Sustained Return-to-Work: A Study of Supervisor and Co-worker Supportiveness and Injury Reaction.

Authors:  Arif Jetha; Anthony D LaMontagne; Rebbecca Lilley; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson; Malcolm Sim; Peter Smith
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2018-09

10.  Helping clinicians in work disability prevention: the work disability diagnosis interview.

Authors:  Marie-José Durand; Patrick Loisel; Quan Nha Hong; Nicole Charpentier
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2002-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.