Literature DB >> 8039778

Evaluation of the Amplicor Chlamydia trachomatis test versus culture in genital samples in various prevalence populations.

B de Barbeyrac1, I Pellet, B Dutilh, C Bébéar, B Dumon, M Géniaux, C Bébéar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a newly developed polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay, Amplicor C trachomatis for the detection of C trachomatis in genital samples using cell culture for comparison.
SUBJECTS: 501 patients (431 women and 70 men) attending an STD clinic in Hôpital Pellegrin (high-risk population) and gynaecological clinics (low-risk population) in Bordeaux, France.
METHODS: The genital samples (cervical and urethral) were tested for the presence of C trachomatis using the Amplicor test and using standard cell culture identified by the immunofluorescence test using a monoclonal antibody to C trachomatis. Discrepancies between the results of culture and Amplicor were further analysed by major outer membrane protein gene (omp1)-PCR of the specimens taken in transport media and by direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) staining of elementary bodies in culture transport tubes.
RESULTS: After analysis of discrepancies, the revised sensitivity and specificity of PCR were 95.3% and 100% and the positive and negative predictive values were 100% and 99.5%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The present results indicate that the Amplicor assay is rapid, specific and more sensitive than the culture method. This test provides an excellent non-culture method for the detection of C trachomatis in various prevalence populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8039778      PMCID: PMC1195223          DOI: 10.1136/sti.70.3.162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genitourin Med        ISSN: 0266-4348


  15 in total

1.  Chlamydia trachomatis confirmatory testing of PCR-positive genitourinary specimens using a second set of plasmid primers.

Authors:  J B Mahony; K E Luinstra; D Jang; J Sellors; M A Chernesky
Journal:  Mol Cell Probes       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 2.365

2.  Detection of C trachomatis in urogenital specimens by polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  H Näher; H Drzonek; J Wolf; M von Knebel Doeberitz; D Petzoldt
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1991-06

3.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by the polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  R Griffais; M Thibon
Journal:  Res Microbiol       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 3.992

4.  Predictive value of a single diagnostic test in unselected populations.

Authors:  T J Vecchio
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1966-05-26       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Performance of a nonisotopic DNA probe for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urogenital specimens.

Authors:  J A Kluytmans; H G Niesters; J W Mouton; W G Quint; J A Ijpelaar; J H Van Rijsoort-Vos; L Habbema; E Stolz; M F Michel; J H Wagenvoort
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens by polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  M J Loeffelholz; C A Lewinski; S R Silver; A P Purohit; S A Herman; D A Buonagurio; E A Dragon
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Specific amplification of a DNA sequence common to all Chlamydia trachomatis serovars using the polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  B Dutilh; C Bébéar; P Rodriguez; A Vekris; J Bonnet; M Garret
Journal:  Res Microbiol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.992

8.  Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a high-risk population: comparison of polymerase chain reaction and cell culture for diagnosis and follow-up.

Authors:  W H Vogels; P C van Voorst Vader; F P Schröder
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Direct detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from symptomatic and asymptomatic men by using a rapid polymerase chain reaction assay.

Authors:  G Jaschek; C A Gaydos; L E Welsh; T C Quinn
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Diagnostic value of the polymerase chain reaction for Chlamydia detection as determined in a follow-up study.

Authors:  H C Claas; J H Wagenvoort; H G Niesters; T T Tio; J H Van Rijsoort-Vos; W G Quint
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  13 in total

1.  Improved sensitivity of the Chlamydia trachomatis Cobas Amplicor assay using an optimized procedure for preparation of specimens.

Authors:  C Niederhauser; L Kaempf
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2003-02-18       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Prospective comparison of cell cultures and nucleic acid amplification tests for laboratory diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis Infections.

Authors:  Deborah J Jespersen; Karen S Flatten; Mary F Jones; Thomas F Smith
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Differences in the sensitivity of the Amplicor Chlamydia trachomatis PCR assay.

Authors:  J M Ossewaarde; G J van Doornum; M Buimer; B Choueiri; A Stary
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1997-06

Review 4.  Chlamydiae as pathogens: new species and new issues.

Authors:  R W Peeling; R C Brunham
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  1996 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 6.883

5.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by ligase chain reaction-based assays with clinical specimens from various sites: implications for diagnostic testing and screening.

Authors:  M Buimer; G J van Doornum; S Ching; P G Peerbooms; P K Plier; D Ram; H H Lee
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Improved PCR detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by using an altered method of specimen transport and high-quality endocervical specimens.

Authors:  J A Kellogg; J W Seiple; J L Klinedinst; E S Stroll; S H Cavanaugh
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Comparison of the Amplicor Chlamydia trachomatis test and cell culture for the detection of urogenital chlamydial infections.

Authors:  M A Catry; M J Borrego; J Cardoso; J Azevedo; I Santo
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1995-08

8.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in urine samples from men and women by ligase chain reaction.

Authors:  G J van Doornum; M Buimer; M Prins; C J Henquet; R A Coutinho; P K Plier; S Tomazic-Allen; H Hu; H Lee
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  PCR and direct fluorescent-antibody staining confirm Chlamydia trachomatis antigens in swabs and urine below the detection threshold of Chlamydiazyme enzyme immunoassay.

Authors:  J Krepel; I Laur; A Sproston; K Luinstra; D Jang; J Mahony; M Chernesky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Evaluation of a commercial polymerase chain reaction assay for Chlamydia trachomatis and suggestions for improving sensitivity.

Authors:  B J Thomas; E J MacLeod; D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.