Literature DB >> 9617998

Genetic sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil and sensory responses to sugar and fat mixtures.

A Drewnowski1, S A Henderson, A Barratt-Fornell.   

Abstract

This study tested the hypothesis that genetic sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) is associated with greater sensitivity to sugar and fat in foods. Subjects were 118 young women from different ethnic backgrounds, mean age 26.9 years and mean body mass index (BMI) 23.4. The women were classified as nontasters (n = 39), medium tasters (n = 48), or supertasters (n = 31) of PROP. Nontasters of PROP had thresholds of 1.8 x 10(-4) mol/L PROP or greater, whereas tasters had thresholds below 1.0 x 10(-4) mol/L PROP. PROP tasters were divided into medium tasters and supertasters, based on the ratio of intensity ratings of suprathreshold PROP solutions relative to NaCl solutions. Supertasters were defined as those with PROP/NaCl ratios of 1.90 or more. The pattern of sensory responses to sweetened dairy products of varying sugar and fat contents closely replicated data obtained in other studies. Genetic sensitivity to PROP was not associated with enhanced perception or altered hedonic response profiles for this range of 15 sugar/fat mixtures. Separating subjects into "likers" and "dislikers" of sweetened dairy products failed to reveal significant links to PROP taster status in this all-female sample.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9617998     DOI: 10.1016/s0031-9384(97)00540-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  20 in total

1.  Phenylthiocarbamide: a 75-year adventure in genetics and natural selection.

Authors:  Stephen Wooding
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  6-n-Propylthiouracil: a genetic marker for taste, with implications for food preference and dietary habits.

Authors:  B J Tepper
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Is the Association Between Sweet and Bitter Perception due to Genetic Variation?

Authors:  Liang-Dar Hwang; Paul A S Breslin; Danielle R Reed; Gu Zhu; Nicholas G Martin; Margaret J Wright
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 3.160

4.  Predominant Qualities Evoked by Quinine, Sucrose, and Capsaicin Associate With PROP Bitterness, but not TAS2R38 Genotype.

Authors:  Alissa A Nolden; John E McGeary; John E Hayes
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 5.  The genetics of phenylthiocarbamide perception.

Authors:  S W Guo; D R Reed
Journal:  Ann Hum Biol       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.533

6.  Examination of the perception of sweet- and bitter-like taste qualities in sucralose preferring and avoiding rats.

Authors:  A-M Torregrossa; G C Loney; J C Smith; L A Eckel
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-12-10

7.  Measures of individual differences in taste and creaminess perception.

Authors:  Juyun Lim; Lenka Urban; Barry G Green
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2008-05-03       Impact factor: 3.160

8.  Reliability of Threshold and Suprathreshold Methods for Taste Phenotyping: Characterization with PROP and Sodium Chloride.

Authors:  Veronica Galindo-Cuspinera; Thierry Waeber; Nicolas Antille; Christoph Hartmann; Nicola Stead; Nathalie Martin
Journal:  Chemosens Percept       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 1.833

9.  Oral sensory phenotype identifies level of sugar and fat required for maximal liking.

Authors:  John E Hayes; Valerie B Duffy
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2008-05-02

10.  Epidemiological studies of taste function: discussion and perspectives.

Authors:  Derek J Snyder; Linda M Bartoshuk
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.691

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.