Literature DB >> 18538361

Oral sensory phenotype identifies level of sugar and fat required for maximal liking.

John E Hayes1, Valerie B Duffy.   

Abstract

A half-century ago, Fischer and colleagues found correlations between food preference and genetic markers of taste [6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP), quinine]. Recently, a number of studies report differences in sweet liking/disliking with taste phenotype or genotype. Here we modeled optimal liking for milk/sugar mixtures using the response surface method among 79 mostly normal weight adults (36 women) who reported low dietary restraint. Two non-overlapping phenotype analyses were performed: a) discordance in PROP versus quinine bitterness and b) number of fungiform papillae (FP, taste papillae on the tongue tip). Although all phenotype groups liked highly sweet and creamy sensations (in liking by sensation models), the fat and sugar levels for hedonic optima varied (in liking by concentration models). Males generally liked higher fat (20 to 40%) and sugar levels, with females disliking unsweetened cream. In quinine/PROP groups, liking peaked at 30% fat/15% sucrose for men and women who tasted 0.32 mM quinine more bitter than 3.2 mM PROP (n=15); a group previously shown to have highest sugar intakes (Duffy et al., 2003). Those tasting PROP more bitter than quinine (n=14) reported greater creamy/sweet sensations, with peak liking at lower fat and sweet levels (3.3% fat/10% sucrose). Generally, those in the high FP group perceived more creamy/sweet sensations with level of liking more influenced by sugar level, especially among high FP females. At high sugar/high fat levels low FP males and females retained this liking while liking fell off for those in the high FP group. In summary, although most liked sweet/creamy sensations, perceptual differences in these sensations varied with oral phenotype, explaining some of the differences in the amount of sugar and fat required to reach hedonic optima. A high affinity for high sugar/high fat mixtures among oral phenotype subgroups has relevance for energy consumption and could explain the link previously observed between oral sensation and body weight.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18538361      PMCID: PMC2564984          DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.04.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  61 in total

1.  Contrast and range effects for category, magnitude and labeled magnitude scales in judgements of sweetness intensity.

Authors:  H T Lawless; J Horne; W Spiers
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 2.  Routes to obesity: phenotypes, food choices and activity.

Authors:  J E Blundell; J Cooling
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.718

Review 3.  Molecular mechanisms of bitter and sweet taste transduction.

Authors:  Robert F Margolskee
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-11-05       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Taste damage: previously unsuspected consequences.

Authors:  Linda M Bartoshuk; Derek J Snyder; Miriam Grushka; Ann M Berger; Valerie B Duffy; John F Kveton
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.160

5.  Genetic taste sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil influences food preference and reported intake in preschool children.

Authors:  Kathleen L Keller; Lone Steinmann; Ricky J Nurse; Beverly J Tepper
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.868

6.  Food acceptance and genetic variation in taste.

Authors:  V B Duffy; L M Bartoshuk
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2000-06

Review 7.  Determinants of food choice: relationships with obesity and weight control.

Authors:  D J Mela
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  2001-11

8.  Influence of genetic taste sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP), dietary restraint and disinhibition on body mass index in middle-aged women.

Authors:  Beverly J Tepper; Natalia V Ullrich
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2002-03

9.  PROP sensitivity affects macronutrient selection.

Authors:  Marleen M J W Kamphuis; Margriet S Westerterp-Plantenga
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2003-07

10.  Relation between PROP (6-n-propylthiouracil) taster status, taste anatomy and dietary intake measures for young men and women.

Authors:  Carol A Yackinous; Jean-Xavier Guinard
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.868

View more
  51 in total

1.  Allelic variation in TAS2R bitter receptor genes associates with variation in sensations from and ingestive behaviors toward common bitter beverages in adults.

Authors:  John E Hayes; Margaret R Wallace; Valerie S Knopik; Deborah M Herbstman; Linda M Bartoshuk; Valerie B Duffy
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  Factors related to fungiform papillae density: the beaver dam offspring study.

Authors:  Mary E Fischer; Karen J Cruickshanks; Carla R Schubert; Alex Pinto; Ronald Klein; Nathan Pankratz; James S Pankow; Guan-Hua Huang
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  Preference for linoleic acid in obesity-prone and obesity-resistant rats is attenuated by the reduction of CD36 on the tongue.

Authors:  Christina S-Y Chen; Elias M Bench; Timothy D Allerton; Allyson L Schreiber; Kenneth P Arceneaux; Stefany D Primeaux
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 3.619

4.  Interpreting consumer preferences: physicohedonic and psychohedonic models yield different information in a coffee-flavored dairy beverage.

Authors:  Bangde Li; John E Hayes; Gregory R Ziegler
Journal:  Food Qual Prefer       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 5.565

5.  Maximizing overall liking results in a superior product to minimizing deviations from ideal ratings: an optimization case study with coffee-flavored milk.

Authors:  Bangde Li; John E Hayes; Gregory R Ziegler
Journal:  Food Qual Prefer       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 5.565

6.  Measuring oral sensitivity in clinical practice: a quick and reliable behavioural method.

Authors:  Terence M Dovey; Victoria K Aldridge; Clarissa I Martin
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 3.438

7.  Type of milk typically consumed, and stated preference, but not health consciousness affect revealed preferences for fat in milk.

Authors:  Alyssa J Bakke; Catherine V Shehan; John E Hayes
Journal:  Food Qual Prefer       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 5.565

Review 8.  Recent advances in the modification of taste and food preferences following bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Stefany D Primeaux; Taniya de Silva; Tony H Tzeng; Monica C Chiang; Daniel S Hsia
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 6.514

9.  Explaining variability in sodium intake through oral sensory phenotype, salt sensation and liking.

Authors:  John E Hayes; Bridget S Sullivan; Valerie B Duffy
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2010-04-07

10.  Sex differences in the effects of inherited bitter thiourea sensitivity on body weight in 4-6-year-old children.

Authors:  Kathleen L Keller; Adrienne Reid; Megan C MacDougall; Hope Cassano; Joo Lee Song; Liyong Deng; Patricia Lanzano; Wendy K Chung; Harry R Kissileff
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 5.002

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.