Literature DB >> 9604345

Within-channel gap detection using dissimilar markers in cochlear implant listeners.

M Chatterjee1, Q J Fu, R V Shannon.   

Abstract

Temporal gap detection thresholds were measured between perceptually dissimilar electrical markers in cochlear implant listeners. Both markers were presented to the same electrode pair. The amplitude and pulse rate of the first marker were fixed, and gap thresholds were measured as a function of either the pulse rate or the amplitude of the second marker. In either case, U-shaped functions were obtained, with lowest gap thresholds occurring when the two markers were similar in both amplitude and pulse rate. Because the two markers were presented to the same electrode pair, the data cannot be accounted for on the basis of across-channel interactions. It is hypothesized that when different markers are used, the perceptual discontinuity from the first marker to the second is similar to the sensation of a brief gap, and dominates the gap detection process. Thus, gap threshold functions with electrically dissimilar markers serve more as indicators of perceptual distance between the markers and less as measures of temporal resolution.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9604345     DOI: 10.1121/1.422772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  13 in total

1.  Across- and within-channel envelope interactions in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Sandra I Oba
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-12

2.  Psychophysical assessment of stimulation sites in auditory prosthesis electrode arrays.

Authors:  Bryan E Pfingst; Rose A Burkholder-Juhasz; Teresa A Zwolan; Li Xu
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Auditory temporal acuity probed with cochlear implant stimulation and cortical recording.

Authors:  Alana E Kirby; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Stream segregation on a single electrode as a function of pulse rate in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Sara I Duran; Leslie M Collins; Chandra S Throckmorton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Age-Related Changes in Temporal Resolution Revisited: Electrophysiological and Behavioral Findings From Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Bruna S S Mussoi; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Relationship between gap detection thresholds and loudness in cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Soha N Garadat; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Unanesthetized auditory cortex exhibits multiple codes for gaps in cochlear implant pulse trains.

Authors:  Alana E Kirby; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-10-04

8.  Neural adaptation and behavioral measures of temporal processing and speech perception in cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Fawen Zhang; Chelsea Benson; Dora Murphy; Melissa Boian; Michael Scott; Robert Keith; Jing Xiang; Paul Abbas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Sequential stream segregation in normally-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Viral D Tejani; Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Channel Interaction During Infrared Light Stimulation in the Cochlea.

Authors:  Aditi Agarwal; Xiaodong Tan; Yingyue Xu; Claus-Peter Richter
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2021-01-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.