Literature DB >> 31033701

Age-Related Changes in Temporal Resolution Revisited: Electrophysiological and Behavioral Findings From Cochlear Implant Users.

Bruna S S Mussoi1, Carolyn J Brown2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The mechanisms underlying age-related changes in speech perception are still unclear, most likely multifactorial and often can be difficult to parse out from the effects of hearing loss. Age-related changes in temporal resolution (i.e., the ability to track rapid changes in sounds) have long been associated with speech perception declines exhibited by many older individuals. The goals of this study were as follows: (1) to assess age-related changes in temporal resolution in cochlear implant (CI) users, and (2) to examine the impact of changes in temporal resolution and cognition on the perception of speech in noise. In this population, it is possible to bypass the cochlea and stimulate the auditory nerve directly in a noninvasive way. Additionally, CI technology allows for manipulation of the temporal properties of a signal without changing its spectrum.
DESIGN: Twenty postlingually deafened Nucleus CI users took part in this study. They were divided into groups of younger (18 to 40 years) and older (68 to 82 years) participants. A cross-sectional study design was used. The speech processor was bypassed and a mid-array electrode was used for stimulation. We compared peripheral and central physiologic measures of temporal resolution with perceptual measures obtained using similar stimuli. Peripherally, temporal resolution was assessed with measures of the rate of recovery of the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP), evoked using a single pulse and a pulse train as maskers. The acoustic change complex (ACC) to gaps in pulse trains was used to assess temporal resolution more centrally. Psychophysical gap detection thresholds were also obtained. Cognitive assessment included two tests of processing speed (Symbol Search and Coding) and one test of working memory (Digit Span Test). Speech perception was tested in the presence of background noise (QuickSIN test). A correlational design was used to explore the relationship between temporal resolution, cognition, and speech perception.
RESULTS: The only metric that showed significant age effects in temporal processing was the ECAP recovery function recorded using pulse train maskers. Younger participants were found to have faster rates of neural recovery following presentation of pulse trains than older participants. Age was not found to have a significant effect on speech perception. When results from both groups were combined, digit span was the only measure significantly correlated with speech perception performance.
CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of CI users, few effects of advancing age on temporal resolution were evident. While this finding would be consistent with a general lack of aging effects on temporal resolution, it is also possible that aging effects are influenced by processing peripheral to the auditory nerve, which is bypassed by the CI. However, it is known that cross-fiber neural synchrony is improved with electrical (as opposed to acoustic) stimulation. This change in neural synchrony may, in turn, make temporal cues more robust/perceptible to all CI users. Future studies involving larger sample sizes should be conducted to confirm these findings. Results of this study also add to the growing body of literature that suggests that working memory is important for the perception of degraded speech.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31033701      PMCID: PMC6814519          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000732

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  111 in total

1.  Residual speech recognition and cochlear implant performance: effects of implantation criteria.

Authors:  J T Rubinstein; W S Parkinson; R S Tyler; B J Gantz
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1999-07

2.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.

Authors:  M F Folstein; S E Folstein; P R McHugh
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 4.791

3.  Cochlear implant performance in geriatric patients.

Authors:  Minoo Lenarz; Hasibe Sönmez; Gert Joseph; Andreas Büchner; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials: parametric data from the cat.

Authors:  C J Brown; P J Abbas
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Cognitive predictors of improvements in adults' spoken word recognition six months after cochlear implant activation.

Authors:  Gitry Heydebrand; Sandra Hale; Lisa Potts; Brenda Gotter; Margaret Skinner
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 1.854

6.  Hearing Impairment and Cognitive Energy: The Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL).

Authors:  M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller; Sophia E Kramer; Mark A Eckert; Brent Edwards; Benjamin W Y Hornsby; Larry E Humes; Ulrike Lemke; Thomas Lunner; Mohan Matthen; Carol L Mackersie; Graham Naylor; Natalie A Phillips; Michael Richter; Mary Rudner; Mitchell S Sommers; Kelly L Tremblay; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Speech Recognition in Adults With Cochlear Implants: The Effects of Working Memory, Phonological Sensitivity, and Aging.

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Michael S Harris; Lauren Boyce; Susan Nittrouer
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Synaptopathy in the noise-exposed and aging cochlea: Primary neural degeneration in acquired sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Sharon G Kujawa; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Intraoperative measures of electrically evoked auditory nerve compound action potential.

Authors:  B J Gantz; C J Brown; P J Abbas
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1994-03

Review 10.  Are individual differences in speech reception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing-impaired adults.

Authors:  Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.117

View more
  9 in total

1.  Speech masking release in Hybrid cochlear implant users: Roles of spectral and temporal cues in electric-acoustic hearing.

Authors:  Viral D Tejani; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Relationship Between the Ability to Detect Frequency Changes or Temporal Gaps and Speech Perception Performance in Post-lingual Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Dianzhao Xie; Jianfen Luo; Xiuhua Chao; Jinming Li; Xianqi Liu; Zhaomin Fan; Haibo Wang; Lei Xu
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 5.152

3.  Characteristics of the Adaptation Recovery Function of the Auditory Nerve and Its Association With Advanced Age in Postlingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Shuman He; Jeffrey Skidmore; Brittney L Carter
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 3.562

4.  Neural Adaptation of the Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve Is Not Affected by Advanced Age in Postlingually Deafened, Middle-aged, and Elderly Adult Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Shuman He; Jeffrey Skidmore; Sara Conroy; William J Riggs; Brittney L Carter; Ruili Xie
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 3.562

5.  The Effect of Advanced Age on the Electrode-Neuron Interface in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Jeffrey Skidmore; Brittney L Carter; William J Riggs; Shuman He
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 3.562

6.  Recovery from forward masking in cochlear implant listeners: Effects of age and the electrode-neuron interface.

Authors:  Kelly N Jahn; Lindsay DeVries; Julie G Arenberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Aging Effects on Cortical Responses to Tones and Speech in Adult Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Zilong Xie; Olga Stakhovskaya; Matthew J Goupell; Samira Anderson
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-07-06

8.  Impact of Aging and the Electrode-to-Neural Interface on Temporal Processing Ability in Cochlear-Implant Users: Gap Detection Thresholds.

Authors:  Maureen J Shader; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Within- and across-frequency temporal processing and speech perception in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Chelsea M Blankenship; Jareen Meinzen-Derr; Fawen Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 3.752

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.