Literature DB >> 9593188

Influence of protein structure databases on the predictive power of statistical pair potentials.

E Furuichi1, P Koehl.   

Abstract

A long standing goal in protein structure studies is the development of reliable energy functions that can be used both to verify protein models derived from experimental constraints as well as for theoretical protein folding and inverse folding computer experiments. In that respect, knowledge-based statistical pair potentials have attracted considerable interests recently mainly because they include the essential features of protein structures as well as solvent effects at a low computing cost. However, the basis on which statistical potentials are derived have been questioned. In this paper, we investigate statistical pair potentials derived from protein three-dimensional structures, addressing in particular questions related to the form of these potentials, as well as to the content of the database from which they are derived. We have shown that statistical pair potentials depend on the size of the proteins included in the database, and that this dependence can be reduced by considering only pairs of residue close in space (i.e., with a cutoff of 8 A). We have shown also that statistical potentials carry a memory of the quality of the database in terms of the amount and diversity of secondary structure it contains. We find, for example, that potentials derived from a database containing alpha-proteins will only perform best on alpha-proteins in fold recognition computer experiments. We believe that this is an overall weakness of these potentials, which must be kept in mind when constructing a database.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9593188     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0134(19980501)31:2<139::aid-prot4>3.0.co;2-h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  15 in total

1.  Statistical potentials for fold assessment.

Authors:  Francisco Melo; Roberto Sánchez; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  The dependence of all-atom statistical potentials on structural training database.

Authors:  Chi Zhang; Song Liu; Hongyi Zhou; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Database-derived potentials dependent on protein size for in silico folding and design.

Authors:  Yves Dehouck; Dimitri Gilis; Marianne Rooman
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Statistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures.

Authors:  Min-Yi Shen; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Near-native structure refinement using in vacuo energy minimization.

Authors:  Christopher M Summa; Michael Levitt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  A new generation of statistical potentials for proteins.

Authors:  Y Dehouck; D Gilis; M Rooman
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-03-13       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Statistical potential for modeling and ranking of protein-ligand interactions.

Authors:  Hao Fan; Dina Schneidman-Duhovny; John J Irwin; Guangqiang Dong; Brian K Shoichet; Andrej Sali
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  Effective knowledge-based potentials.

Authors:  Evandro Ferrada; Francisco Melo
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  Adenosine A(2A) receptors in psychopharmacology: modulators of behavior, mood and cognition.

Authors:  Hai-Ying Shen; Jiang-Fan Chen
Journal:  Curr Neuropharmacol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 7.363

10.  Four distances between pairs of amino acids provide a precise description of their interaction.

Authors:  Mati Cohen; Vladimir Potapov; Gideon Schreiber
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.