Literature DB >> 17075131

Statistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures.

Min-Yi Shen1, Andrej Sali.   

Abstract

Protein structures in the Protein Data Bank provide a wealth of data about the interactions that determine the native states of proteins. Using the probability theory, we derive an atomic distance-dependent statistical potential from a sample of native structures that does not depend on any adjustable parameters (Discrete Optimized Protein Energy, or DOPE). DOPE is based on an improved reference state that corresponds to noninteracting atoms in a homogeneous sphere with the radius dependent on a sample native structure; it thus accounts for the finite and spherical shape of the native structures. The DOPE potential was extracted from a nonredundant set of 1472 crystallographic structures. We tested DOPE and five other scoring functions by the detection of the native state among six multiple target decoy sets, the correlation between the score and model error, and the identification of the most accurate non-native structure in the decoy set. For all decoy sets, DOPE is the best performing function in terms of all criteria, except for a tie in one criterion for one decoy set. To facilitate its use in various applications, such as model assessment, loop modeling, and fitting into cryo-electron microscopy mass density maps combined with comparative protein structure modeling, DOPE was incorporated into the modeling package MODELLER-8.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17075131      PMCID: PMC2242414          DOI: 10.1110/ps.062416606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  89 in total

1.  Derivation of protein-specific pair potentials based on weak sequence fragment similarity.

Authors:  J Skolnick; A Kolinski; A Ortiz
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2000-01-01

2.  Identifying sequence-structure pairs undetected by sequence alignments.

Authors:  S Miyazawa; R L Jernigan
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  2000-07

3.  Comparative protein structure modeling by iterative alignment, model building and model assessment.

Authors:  Bino John; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 4.  Development of novel statistical potentials for protein fold recognition.

Authors:  N-V Buchete; J E Straub; D Thirumalai
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.809

Review 5.  Protein folding thermodynamics and dynamics: where physics, chemistry, and biology meet.

Authors:  Eugene Shakhnovich
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 60.622

6.  Influence of protein structure databases on the predictive power of statistical pair potentials.

Authors:  E Furuichi; P Koehl
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1998-05-01

Review 7.  Empirical potentials and functions for protein folding and binding.

Authors:  S Vajda; M Sippl; J Novotny
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 6.809

Review 8.  The formation and stabilization of protein structure.

Authors:  C B Anfinsen
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 3.857

9.  Self-consistent assignment of asparagine and glutamine amide rotamers in protein crystal structures.

Authors:  Christian X Weichenberger; Manfred J Sippl
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.006

10.  Refinement of protein structures by iterative comparative modeling and CryoEM density fitting.

Authors:  Maya Topf; Matthew L Baker; Marc A Marti-Renom; Wah Chiu; Andrej Sali
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2006-02-02       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  929 in total

1.  Distance-dependent statistical potentials for discriminating thermophilic and mesophilic proteins.

Authors:  Yunqi Li; Jianwen Fang
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 3.575

2.  Function of human Rh based on structure of RhCG at 2.1 A.

Authors:  Franz Gruswitz; Sarika Chaudhary; Joseph D Ho; Avner Schlessinger; Bobak Pezeshki; Chi-Min Ho; Andrej Sali; Connie M Westhoff; Robert M Stroud
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  DL-PRO: A Novel Deep Learning Method for Protein Model Quality Assessment.

Authors:  Son P Nguyen; Yi Shang; Dong Xu
Journal:  Proc Int Jt Conf Neural Netw       Date:  2014-07

4.  Enzymatic deamination of the epigenetic base N-6-methyladenine.

Authors:  Siddhesh S Kamat; Hao Fan; J Michael Sauder; Stephen K Burley; Brian K Shoichet; Andrej Sali; Frank M Raushel
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  PyMod: sequence similarity searches, multiple sequence-structure alignments, and homology modeling within PyMOL.

Authors:  Emanuele Bramucci; Alessandro Paiardini; Francesco Bossa; Stefano Pascarella
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  GOAP: a generalized orientation-dependent, all-atom statistical potential for protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Hongyi Zhou; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Genomics-aided structure prediction.

Authors:  Joanna I Sułkowska; Faruck Morcos; Martin Weigt; Terence Hwa; José N Onuchic
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Glutamate Ligation in the Ni(II)- and Co(II)-Responsive Escherichia coli Transcriptional Regulator, RcnR.

Authors:  Carolyn E Carr; Francesco Musiani; Hsin-Ting Huang; Peter T Chivers; Stefano Ciurli; Michael J Maroney
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 5.165

9.  Molecular modeling and site-directed mutagenesis reveal essential residues for catalysis in a prokaryote-type aspartate aminotransferase.

Authors:  Fernando de la Torre; Aurelio A Moya-García; María-Fernanda Suárez; Carlos Rodríguez-Caso; Rafael A Cañas; Francisca Sánchez-Jiménez; Francisco M Cánovas
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  Molecular Mechanisms for Species Differences in Organic Anion Transporter 1, OAT1: Implications for Renal Drug Toxicity.

Authors:  Ling Zou; Adrian Stecula; Anshul Gupta; Bhagwat Prasad; Huan-Chieh Chien; Sook Wah Yee; Li Wang; Jashvant D Unadkat; Simone H Stahl; Katherine S Fenner; Kathleen M Giacomini
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 4.436

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.