Literature DB >> 15240455

Database-derived potentials dependent on protein size for in silico folding and design.

Yves Dehouck1, Dimitri Gilis, Marianne Rooman.   

Abstract

Knowledge-based potentials are widely used in simulations of protein folding, structure prediction, and protein design. Their advantages include limited computational requirements and the ability to deal with low-resolution protein models compatible with long-scale simulations. Their drawbacks comprehend their dependence on specific features of the dataset from which they are derived, such as the size of the proteins it contains, and their physical meaning is still a subject of debate. We address these issues by probing the theoretical validity of these potentials as mean-force potentials that take the solvent implicitly into account and involve entropic contributions due to atomic degrees of freedom and solvation. The dependence on the size of the system is checked on distance-dependent amino acid pair potentials, derived from six protein structure sets containing proteins of increasing length N. For large inter-residue distances, they are found to display the theoretically predicted 1/N behavior weighted by a factor depending on the boundaries and the compressibility of the system. For short distances, different trends are observed according to the nature of the residue pairs and their ability to form, for example, electrostatic, cation-pi or pi-pi interactions, or hydrophobic packing. The results of this analysis are used to devise a novel protein size-dependent distance potential, which displays an improved performance in discriminating native sequence-structure matches among decoy models.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15240455      PMCID: PMC1304340          DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.103.037861

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  45 in total

1.  On the design and analysis of protein folding potentials.

Authors:  D Tobi; G Shafran; N Linial; R Elber
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2000-07-01

Review 2.  Ab initio protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Corey Hardin; Taras V Pogorelov; Zaida Luthey-Schulten
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 6.809

3.  The Cationminus signpi Interaction.

Authors:  Jennifer C. Ma; Dennis A. Dougherty
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  1997-08-05       Impact factor: 60.622

4.  Prediction of protein folding from amino acid sequence over discrete conformation spaces.

Authors:  G M Crippen
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1991-04-30       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 5.  Protein structure prediction.

Authors:  B Al-Lazikani; J Jung; Z Xiang; B Honig
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 8.822

6.  An improved protein decoy set for testing energy functions for protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Jerry Tsai; Richard Bonneau; Alexandre V Morozov; Brian Kuhlman; Carol A Rohl; David Baker
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2003-10-01

7.  Influence of protein structure databases on the predictive power of statistical pair potentials.

Authors:  E Furuichi; P Koehl
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1998-05-01

8.  Statistical potentials extracted from protein structures: how accurate are they?

Authors:  P D Thomas; K A Dill
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1996-03-29       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Conformation of amino acid side-chains in proteins.

Authors:  J Janin; S Wodak
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1978-11-05       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Comparison of the folding processes of distantly related proteins. Importance of hydrophobic content in folding.

Authors:  Giulia Calloni; Niccolò Taddei; Kevin W Plaxco; Giampietro Ramponi; Massimo Stefani; Fabrizio Chiti
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2003-07-11       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  6 in total

1.  A new generation of statistical potentials for proteins.

Authors:  Y Dehouck; D Gilis; M Rooman
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-03-13       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  The twilight zone between protein order and disorder.

Authors:  A Szilágyi; D Györffy; P Závodszky
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Thermo- and mesostabilizing protein interactions identified by temperature-dependent statistical potentials.

Authors:  Benjamin Folch; Yves Dehouck; Marianne Rooman
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Improved insights into protein thermal stability: from the molecular to the structurome scale.

Authors:  Fabrizio Pucci; Marianne Rooman
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2016-11-13       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Information-theoretic analysis of the reference state in contact potentials used for protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Armando D Solis; Shalom R Rackovsky
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-05-01

6.  Large-scale in silico mutagenesis experiments reveal optimization of genetic code and codon usage for protein mutational robustness.

Authors:  Martin Schwersensky; Marianne Rooman; Fabrizio Pucci
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 7.431

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.