Literature DB >> 17360625

Near-native structure refinement using in vacuo energy minimization.

Christopher M Summa1, Michael Levitt.   

Abstract

One of the greatest shortcomings of macromolecular energy minimization and molecular dynamics techniques is that they generally do not preserve the native structure of proteins as observed by x-ray crystallography. This deformation of the native structure means that these methods are not generally used to refine structures produced by homology-modeling techniques. Here, we use a database of 75 proteins to test the ability of a variety of popular molecular mechanics force fields to maintain the native structure. Minimization from the native structure is a weak test of potential energy functions: It is complemented by a much stronger test in which the same methods are compared for their ability to attract a near-native decoy protein structure toward the native structure. We use a powerfully convergent energy-minimization method and show that, of the traditional molecular mechanics potentials tested, only one showed a modest net improvement over a large data set of structurally diverse proteins. A smooth, differentiable knowledge-based pairwise atomic potential performs better on this test than traditional potential functions. This work is expected to have important implications for protein structure refinement, homology modeling, and structure prediction.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17360625      PMCID: PMC1802011          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0611593104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  31 in total

1.  Large Amplitude Elastic Motions in Proteins from a Single-Parameter, Atomic Analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1996-08-26       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  A distance-dependent atomic knowledge-based potential for improved protein structure selection.

Authors:  H Lu; J Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2001-08-15

3.  Increasing the precision of comparative models with YASARA NOVA--a self-parameterizing force field.

Authors:  Elmar Krieger; Günther Koraimann; Gert Vriend
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2002-05-15

4.  The state of the Protein Structure Initiative.

Authors:  Eaton Lattman
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-03-01

5.  Exploring the helix-coil transition via all-atom equilibrium ensemble simulations.

Authors:  Eric J Sorin; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Structural biology. Structural genomics, round 2.

Authors:  Robert Service
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-03-11       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Making optimal use of empirical energy functions: force-field parameterization in crystal space.

Authors:  Elmar Krieger; Tom Darden; Sander B Nabuurs; Alexei Finkelstein; Gert Vriend
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-12-01

8.  Influence of protein structure databases on the predictive power of statistical pair potentials.

Authors:  E Furuichi; P Koehl
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1998-05-01

9.  Computation of structures of homologous proteins. Alpha-lactalbumin from lysozyme.

Authors:  P K Warme; F A Momany; S V Rumball; R W Tuttle; H A Scheraga
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1974-02-12       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Statistical potentials extracted from protein structures: how accurate are they?

Authors:  P D Thomas; K A Dill
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1996-03-29       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  68 in total

1.  Smoothing protein energy landscapes by integrating folding models with structure prediction.

Authors:  Ari Pritchard-Bell; M Scott Shell
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Multiscale natural moves refine macromolecules using single-particle electron microscopy projection images.

Authors:  Junjie Zhang; Peter Minary; Michael Levitt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Probing protein fold space with a simplified model.

Authors:  Peter Minary; Michael Levitt
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Solvent dramatically affects protein structure refinement.

Authors:  Gaurav Chopra; Christopher M Summa; Michael Levitt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Enhancement of beta-sheet assembly by cooperative hydrogen bonds potential.

Authors:  Ami Levy-Moonshine; El-Ad David Amir; Chen Keasar
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Use of decoys to optimize an all-atom force field including hydration.

Authors:  Yelena A Arnautova; Harold A Scheraga
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  LEAP: highly accurate prediction of protein loop conformations by integrating coarse-grained sampling and optimized energy scores with all-atom refinement of backbone and side chains.

Authors:  Shide Liang; Chi Zhang; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.376

8.  A coarse-grained potential for fold recognition and molecular dynamics simulations of proteins.

Authors:  Peter Májek; Ron Elber
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009-09

9.  Explicit orientation dependence in empirical potentials and its significance to side-chain modeling.

Authors:  Jianpeng Ma
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 22.384

10.  Protein Structure Refinement through Structure Selection and Averaging from Molecular Dynamics Ensembles.

Authors:  Vahid Mirjalili; Michael Feig
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-12-22       Impact factor: 6.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.