Literature DB >> 19530247

Effective knowledge-based potentials.

Evandro Ferrada1, Francisco Melo.   

Abstract

Empirical or knowledge-based potentials have many applications in structural biology such as the prediction of protein structure, protein-protein, and protein-ligand interactions and in the evaluation of stability for mutant proteins, the assessment of errors in experimentally solved structures, and the design of new proteins. Here, we describe a simple procedure to derive and use pairwise distance-dependent potentials that rely on the definition of effective atomic interactions, which attempt to capture interactions that are more likely to be physically relevant. Based on a difficult benchmark test composed of proteins with different secondary structure composition and representing many different folds, we show that the use of effective atomic interactions significantly improves the performance of potentials at discriminating between native and near-native conformations. We also found that, in agreement with previous reports, the potentials derived from the observed effective atomic interactions in native protein structures contain a larger amount of mutual information. A detailed analysis of the effective energy functions shows that atom connectivity effects, which mostly arise when deriving the potential by the incorporation of those indirect atomic interactions occurring beyond the first atomic shell, are clearly filtered out. The shape of the energy functions for direct atomic interactions representing hydrogen bonding and disulfide and salt bridges formation is almost unaffected when effective interactions are taken into account. On the contrary, the shape of the energy functions for indirect atom interactions (i.e., those describing the interaction between two atoms bound to a direct interacting pair) is clearly different when effective interactions are considered. Effective energy functions for indirect interacting atom pairs are not influenced by the shape or the energy minimum observed for the corresponding direct interacting atom pair. Our results suggest that the dependency between the signals in different energy functions is a key aspect that need to be addressed when empirical energy functions are derived and used, and also highlight the importance of additivity assumptions in the use of potential energy functions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19530247      PMCID: PMC2775215          DOI: 10.1002/pro.166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  35 in total

1.  Filtered neighbors threading.

Authors:  J R Bienkowska; R G Rogers; T F Smith
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1999-11-15

2.  Statistical potentials for fold assessment.

Authors:  Francisco Melo; Roberto Sánchez; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Four-body potentials reveal protein-specific correlations to stability changes caused by hydrophobic core mutations.

Authors:  C W Carter; B C LeFebvre; S A Cammer; A Tropsha; M H Edgell
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-08-24       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Development of unified statistical potentials describing protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  Hui Lu; Long Lu; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Distance-scaled, finite ideal-gas reference state improves structure-derived potentials of mean force for structure selection and stability prediction.

Authors:  Hongyi Zhou; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Cooperativity, smooth energy landscapes and the origins of topology-dependent protein folding rates.

Authors:  Andrew I Jewett; Vijay S Pande; Kevin W Plaxco
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2003-02-07       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Information-theoretic dissection of pairwise contact potentials.

Authors:  Melissa S Cline; Kevin Karplus; Richard H Lathrop; Temple F Smith; Robert G Rogers; David Haussler
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2002-10-01

8.  The dependence of all-atom statistical potentials on structural training database.

Authors:  Chi Zhang; Song Liu; Hongyi Zhou; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Local propensities and statistical potentials of backbone dihedral angles in proteins.

Authors:  Marcos R Betancourt; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2004-09-10       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  StAR: a simple tool for the statistical comparison of ROC curves.

Authors:  Ismael A Vergara; Tomás Norambuena; Evandro Ferrada; Alex W Slater; Francisco Melo
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-06-05       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  7 in total

1.  Principal component analysis of binding energies for single-point mutants of hT2R16 bound to an agonist correlate with experimental mutant cell response.

Authors:  Derek E Chen; Darryl L Willick; Joseph B Ruckel; Wely B Floriano
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.479

Review 2.  Human allelic variation: perspective from protein function, structure, and evolution.

Authors:  Daniel M Jordan; Vasily E Ramensky; Shamil R Sunyaev
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 6.809

3.  The Protein-DNA Interface database.

Authors:  Tomás Norambuena; Francisco Melo
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Predicting changes in protein thermostability brought about by single- or multi-site mutations.

Authors:  Jian Tian; Ningfeng Wu; Xiaoyu Chu; Yunliu Fan
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Trends in template/fragment-free protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Yaoqi Zhou; Yong Duan; Yuedong Yang; Eshel Faraggi; Hongxing Lei
Journal:  Theor Chem Acc       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 1.702

Review 6.  Protein flexibility in the light of structural alphabets.

Authors:  Pierrick Craveur; Agnel P Joseph; Jeremy Esque; Tarun J Narwani; Floriane Noël; Nicolas Shinada; Matthieu Goguet; Sylvain Leonard; Pierre Poulain; Olivier Bertrand; Guilhem Faure; Joseph Rebehmed; Amine Ghozlane; Lakshmipuram S Swapna; Ramachandra M Bhaskara; Jonathan Barnoud; Stéphane Téletchéa; Vincent Jallu; Jiri Cerny; Bohdan Schneider; Catherine Etchebest; Narayanaswamy Srinivasan; Jean-Christophe Gelly; Alexandre G de Brevern
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2015-05-27

7.  All-Atom Four-Body Knowledge-Based Statistical Potentials to Distinguish Native Protein Structures from Nonnative Folds.

Authors:  Majid Masso
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-10-08       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.