Literature DB >> 15189839

The dependence of all-atom statistical potentials on structural training database.

Chi Zhang1, Song Liu, Hongyi Zhou, Yaoqi Zhou.   

Abstract

An accurate statistical energy function that is suitable for the prediction of protein structures of all classes should be independent of the structural database used for energy extraction. Here, two high-resolution, low-sequence-identity structural databases of 333 alpha-proteins and 271 beta-proteins were built for examining the database dependence of three all-atom statistical energy functions. They are RAPDF (residue-specific all-atom conditional probability discriminatory function), atomic KBP (atomic knowledge-based potential), and DFIRE (statistical potential based on distance-scaled finite ideal-gas reference state). These energy functions differ in the reference states used for energy derivation. The energy functions extracted from the different structural databases are used to select native structures from multiple decoys of 64 alpha-proteins and 28 beta-proteins. The performance in native structure selections indicates that the DFIRE-based energy function is mostly independent of the structural database whereas RAPDF and KBP have a significant dependence. The construction of two additional structural databases of alpha/beta and alpha + beta-proteins further confirmed the weak dependence of DFIRE on the structural databases of various structural classes. The possible source for the difference between the three all-atom statistical energy functions is that the physical reference state of ideal gas used in the DFIRE-based energy function is least dependent on the structural database.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15189839      PMCID: PMC1304244          DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.103.035998

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  53 in total

1.  Knowledge-based interaction potentials for proteins.

Authors:  A Rojnuckarin; S Subramaniam
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1999-07-01

2.  Use of pair potentials across protein interfaces in screening predicted docked complexes.

Authors:  G Moont; H A Gabb; M J Sternberg
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1999-05-15

3.  A physical reference state unifies the structure-derived potential of mean force for protein folding and binding.

Authors:  Song Liu; Chi Zhang; Hongyi Zhou; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-07-01

4.  Single-body residue-level knowledge-based energy score combined with sequence-profile and secondary structure information for fold recognition.

Authors:  Hongyi Zhou; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-06-01

5.  Assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles.

Authors:  R Lüthy; J U Bowie; D Eisenberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-03-05       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Identification of native protein folds amongst a large number of incorrect models. The calculation of low energy conformations from potentials of mean force.

Authors:  M Hendlich; P Lackner; S Weitckus; H Floeckner; R Froschauer; K Gottsbacher; G Casari; M J Sippl
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1990-11-05       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 7.  Structure-derived hydrophobic potential. Hydrophobic potential derived from X-ray structures of globular proteins is able to identify native folds.

Authors:  G Casari; M J Sippl
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1992-04-05       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Rapid and sensitive sequence comparison with FASTP and FASTA.

Authors:  W R Pearson
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.600

9.  Calculation of conformational ensembles from potentials of mean force. An approach to the knowledge-based prediction of local structures in globular proteins.

Authors:  M J Sippl
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1990-06-20       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Improved tools for biological sequence comparison.

Authors:  W R Pearson; D J Lipman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  15 in total

1.  GOAP: a generalized orientation-dependent, all-atom statistical potential for protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Hongyi Zhou; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Improving computational protein design by using structure-derived sequence profile.

Authors:  Liang Dai; Yuedong Yang; Hyung Rae Kim; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-08-01

3.  Recovering physical potentials from a model protein databank.

Authors:  J W Mullinax; W G Noid
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A composite score for predicting errors in protein structure models.

Authors:  David Eramian; Min-yi Shen; Damien Devos; Francisco Melo; Andrej Sali; Marc A Marti-Renom
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Statistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures.

Authors:  Min-Yi Shen; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  A new generation of statistical potentials for proteins.

Authors:  Y Dehouck; D Gilis; M Rooman
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-03-13       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Statistical potential for modeling and ranking of protein-ligand interactions.

Authors:  Hao Fan; Dina Schneidman-Duhovny; John J Irwin; Guangqiang Dong; Brian K Shoichet; Andrej Sali
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  Effective knowledge-based potentials.

Authors:  Evandro Ferrada; Francisco Melo
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  Helix-sheet packing in proteins.

Authors:  Chengcheng Hu; Patrice Koehl
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-05-15

10.  Predicting residue-residue contact maps by a two-layer, integrated neural-network method.

Authors:  Bin Xue; Eshel Faraggi; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.