Literature DB >> 9550188

In vivo pressure measurements of lithotripsy shock waves in pigs.

R O Cleveland1, D A Lifshitz, B A Connors, A P Evan, L R Willis, L A Crum.   

Abstract

Stone comminution and tissue damage in lithotripsy are sensitive to the acoustic field within the kidney, yet knowledge of shock waves in vivo is limited. We have made measurements of lithotripsy shock waves inside pigs with small hydrophones constructed of a 25-microm PVDF membrane stretched over a 21-mm diameter ring. A thin layer of silicone rubber was used to isolate the membrane electrically from pig fluid. A hydrophone was positioned around the pig kidney following a flank incision. Hydrophones were placed on either the anterior (shock wave entrance) or the posterior (shock wave exit) surface of the left kidney. Fluoroscopic imaging was used to orient the hydrophone perpendicular to the shock wave. For each pig, the voltage settings (12-24 kV) and the position of the shock wave focus within the kidney were varied. Waveforms measured within the pig had a shape very similar to those measured in water, but the peak pressure was about 70% of that in water. The focal region in vivo was 82 mm x 20 mm, larger than that measured in vitro (57 mm x 12 mm). It appeared that a combination of nonlinear effects and inhomogeneities in the tissue broadened the focus of the lithotripter. The shock rise time was on the order of 100 ns, substantially more than the rise time measured in water, and was attributed to higher absorption in tissue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9550188     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-5629(97)00270-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  10 in total

1.  The effect of reflector geometry on the acoustic field and bubble dynamics produced by an electrohydraulic shock wave lithotripter.

Authors:  Yufeng Zhou; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Beamwidth measurement of individual lithotripter shock waves.

Authors:  Wayne Kreider; Michael R Bailey; Jeffrey A Ketterling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effect of the body wall on lithotripter shock waves.

Authors:  Guangyan Li; James A McAteer; James C Williams; Zachary C Berwick
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 4.  [The future of ESWL].

Authors:  K U Köhrmann; D Neisius; J Rassweiler
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Preliminary Report on Stone Breakage and Lesion Size Produced by a New Extracorporeal Electrohydraulic (Sparker Array) Discharge Device.

Authors:  Bret A Connors; Ray B Schaefer; John J Gallagher; Cynthia D Johnson; Guangyan Li; Rajash K Handa; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Simulation of the effects of cavitation and anatomy in the shock path of model lithotripters.

Authors:  Jeff Krimmel; Tim Colonius; Michel Tanguay
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-11-10

7.  Shock-induced heating and millisecond boiling in gels and tissue due to high intensity focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Michael S Canney; Vera A Khokhlova; Olga V Bessonova; Michael R Bailey; Lawrence A Crum
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  The effect of renal cortical thickness on the treatment outcomes of kidney stones treated with shockwave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Chi-Fai Ng; Sylvia Luke; Peter K F Chiu; Jeremy Y C Teoh; Ka-Tak Wong; Simon S M Hou
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-04-28

9.  Quantitative Assessments of Mechanical Responses upon Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy.

Authors:  Yajun Liu; Xiaodong Chen; Anyi Guo; Sijin Liu; Guoqing Hu
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 16.806

10.  Optimal Skin-to-Stone Distance Is a Positive Predictor for Successful Outcomes in Upper Ureter Calculi following Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: A Bayesian Model Averaging Approach.

Authors:  Kang Su Cho; Hae Do Jung; Won Sik Ham; Doo Yong Chung; Yong Jin Kang; Won Sik Jang; Jong Kyou Kwon; Young Deuk Choi; Joo Yong Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.