Literature DB >> 21063697

Simulation of the effects of cavitation and anatomy in the shock path of model lithotripters.

Jeff Krimmel1, Tim Colonius, Michel Tanguay.   

Abstract

We report on recent efforts to develop predictive models for the pressure and other flow variables in the focal region of shock wave lithotripters. Baseline simulations of three representative lithotripters (electrohydraulic, electromagnetic, and piezoelectric) compare favorably with in vitro experiments (in a water bath). We proceed to model and investigate how shock focusing is altered by the presence of material interfaces associated with different types of tissue encountered along the shock path, and by the presence of cavitation bubbles that are excited by tensile pressures associated with the focused shock wave. We use human anatomical data, but simplify the description by assuming that the tissue behaves as a fluid, and by assuming cylindrical symmetry along the shock path. Scattering by material interfaces is significant, and regions of high pressure amplitudes (both compressive and tensile) are generated almost 4 cm postfocus. Bubble dynamics generate secondary shocks whose strength depends on the density of bubbles and the pulse repetition frequency (PRF). At sufficiently large densities, the bubbles also attenuate the shock. Together with experimental evidence, the simulations suggest that high PRF may be counterproductive for stone comminution. Finally, we discuss how the lithotripter simulations can be used as input to more detailed physical models that attempt to characterize the mechanisms by which collapsing cavitation models erode stones, and by which shock waves and bubbles may damage tissue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21063697      PMCID: PMC3032941          DOI: 10.1007/s00240-010-0332-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Res        ISSN: 0300-5623


  33 in total

1.  Mechanical haemolysis in shock wave lithotripsy (SWL): I. Analysis of cell deformation due to SWL flow-fields.

Authors:  M Lokhandwalla; B Sturtevant
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Cavitation bubble cluster activity in the breakage of kidney stones by lithotripter shockwaves.

Authors:  Yuriy A Pishchalnikov; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Michael R Bailey; James C Williams; Robin O Cleveland; Tim Colonius; Lawrence A Crum; Andrew P Evan; James A McAteer
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Modeling elastic wave propagation in kidney stones with application to shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Robin O Cleveland; Oleg A Sapozhnikov
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Inertial cavitation and associated acoustic emission produced during electrohydraulic shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  P Zhong; I Cioanta; F H Cocks; G M Preminger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Cavitation microjets as a contributory mechanism for renal calculi disintegration in ESWL.

Authors:  L A Crum
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 6.  A review of the physical properties and biological effects of the high amplitude acoustic field used in extracorporeal lithotripsy.

Authors:  A J Coleman; J E Saunders
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.890

7.  The mechanisms of stone disintegration by shock waves.

Authors:  W Sass; M Bräunlich; H P Dreyer; E Matura; W Folberth; H G Preismeyer; J Seifert
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  The role of stress waves and cavitation in stone comminution in shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Songlin Zhu; Franklin H Cocks; Glenn M Preminger; Pei Zhong
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Kidney damage and renal functional changes are minimized by waveform control that suppresses cavitation in shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Andrew P Evan; Lynn R Willis; James A McAteer; Michael R Bailey; Bret A Connors; Youzhi Shao; James E Lingeman; James C Williams; Naomi S Fineberg; Lawrence A Crum
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Shock-induced collapse of a gas bubble in shockwave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Eric Johnsen; Tim Colonius
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  5 in total

1.  Experimentally validated multiphysics computational model of focusing and shock wave formation in an electromagnetic lithotripter.

Authors:  Daniel E Fovargue; Sorin Mitran; Nathan B Smith; Georgy N Sankin; Walter N Simmons; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Editorial comment: Size and location of defects at the coupling interface affect lithotripter performance.

Authors:  Jens Rassweiler
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Size and location of defects at the coupling interface affect lithotripter performance.

Authors:  Guangyan Li; James C Williams; Yuri A Pishchalnikov; Ziyue Liu; James A McAteer
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-09-03       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Turbulent water coupling in shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Jaclyn Lautz; Georgy Sankin; Pei Zhong
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  A Source Term Approach for Generation of One-way Acoustic Waves in the Euler and Navier-Stokes equations.

Authors:  Kazuki Maeda; Tim Colonius
Journal:  Wave Motion       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 2.020

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.