Literature DB >> 20018433

Shock-induced heating and millisecond boiling in gels and tissue due to high intensity focused ultrasound.

Michael S Canney1, Vera A Khokhlova, Olga V Bessonova, Michael R Bailey, Lawrence A Crum.   

Abstract

Nonlinear propagation causes high-intensity ultrasound waves to distort and generate higher harmonics, which are more readily absorbed and converted to heat than the fundamental frequency. Although such nonlinear effects have been investigated previously and found to not significantly alter high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatments, two results reported here change this paradigm. One is that at clinically relevant intensity levels, HIFU waves not only become distorted but form shock waves in tissue. The other is that the generated shock waves heat the tissue to boiling in much less time than predicted for undistorted or weakly distorted waves. In this study, a 2-MHz HIFU source operating at peak intensities up to 25,000 W/cm(2) was used to heat transparent tissue-mimicking phantoms and ex vivo bovine liver samples. Initiation of boiling was detected using high-speed photography, a 20-MHz passive cavitation detector and fluctuation of the drive voltage at the HIFU source. The time to boil obtained experimentally was used to quantify heating rates and was compared with calculations using weak shock theory and the shock amplitudes obtained from nonlinear modeling and measurements with a fiber optic hydrophone. As observed experimentally and predicted by calculations, shocked focal waveforms produced boiling in as little as 3 ms and the time to initiate boiling was sensitive to small changes in HIFU output. Nonlinear heating as a result of shock waves is therefore important to HIFU, and clinicians should be aware of the potential for very rapid boiling because it alters treatments. 2010 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20018433      PMCID: PMC2815111          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2009.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  22 in total

1.  Production of harmonics in vitro by high-intensity focused ultrasound.

Authors:  R L Clarke; G R ter Haar
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 2.  Image-guided acoustic therapy.

Authors:  S Vaezy; M Andrew; P Kaczkowski; L Crum
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.590

3.  Measurement of high intensity focused ultrasound fields by a fiber optic probe hydrophone.

Authors:  Yufeng Zhou; Liang Zhai; Rebecca Simmons; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging of boiling induced by high intensity focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Tatiana D Khokhlova; Michael S Canney; Donghoon Lee; Kenneth I Marro; Lawrence A Crum; Vera A Khokhlova; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Absorption of finite amplitude focused ultrasound.

Authors:  D Dalecki; E L Carstensen; K J Parker; D R Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Temporal and spatial detection of HIFU-induced inertial and hot-vapor cavitation with a diagnostic ultrasound system.

Authors:  Caleb H Farny; R Glynn Holt; Ronald A Roy
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  The intensity dependence of the site of maximal energy deposition in focused ultrasound surgery.

Authors:  N A Watkin; G R ter Haar; I Rivens
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 8.  High-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of solid tumours.

Authors:  James E Kennedy
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 60.716

9.  Acoustic shock generation by ultrasonic imaging equipment.

Authors:  F A Duck; H C Starritt
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  MRI-guided gas bubble enhanced ultrasound heating in in vivo rabbit thigh.

Authors:  S D Sokka; R King; K Hynynen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-01-21       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  54 in total

1.  Mechanical decellularization of tissue volumes using boiling histotripsy.

Authors:  Yak-Nam Wang; Tatiana D Khokhlova; Sergey Buravkov; Valeriy Chernikov; Wayne Kreider; Ari Partanen; Navid Farr; Adam Maxwell; George R Schade; Vera A Khokhlova
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Controlled tissue emulsification produced by high intensity focused ultrasound shock waves and millisecond boiling.

Authors:  Tatiana D Khokhlova; Michael S Canney; Vera A Khokhlova; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Lawrence A Crum; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Cavitation clouds created by shock scattering from bubbles during histotripsy.

Authors:  Adam D Maxwell; Tzu-Yin Wang; Charles A Cain; J Brian Fowlkes; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Michael R Bailey; Zhen Xu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  A DERATING METHOD FOR THERAPEUTIC APPLICATIONS OF HIGH INTENSITY FOCUSED ULTRASOUND.

Authors:  O V Bessonova; V A Khokhlova; M S Canney; M R Bailey; L A Crum
Journal:  Acoust Phys       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 0.856

5.  Rectified growth of histotripsy bubbles.

Authors:  Wayne Kreider; Adam D Maxwell; Tatiana Khokhlova; Julianna C Simon; Vera A Khokhlova; Oleg Sapozhnikov; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  Proc Meet Acoust       Date:  2013

6.  Investigation into the mechanisms of tissue atomization by high-intensity focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Julianna C Simon; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Yak-Nam Wang; Vera A Khokhlova; Lawrence A Crum; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Infrared mapping of ultrasound fields generated by medical transducers: feasibility of determining absolute intensity levels.

Authors:  Vera A Khokhlova; Svetlana M Shmeleva; Leonid R Gavrilov; Eleanor Martin; Neelaksh Sadhoo; Adam Shaw
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Noninvasive ureterocele puncture using pulsed focused ultrasound: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Adam D Maxwell; Ryan S Hsi; Michael R Bailey; Pasquale Casale; Thomas S Lendvay
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Combined passive detection and ultrafast active imaging of cavitation events induced by short pulses of high-intensity ultrasound.

Authors:  Jérôme Gateau; Jean-François Aubry; Mathieu Pernot; Mathias Fink; Mickaël Tanter
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.725

10.  The role of acoustic nonlinearity in tissue heating behind a rib cage using a high-intensity focused ultrasound phased array.

Authors:  Petr V Yuldashev; Svetlana M Shmeleva; Sergey A Ilyin; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Leonid R Gavrilov; Vera A Khokhlova
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.