Literature DB >> 18389207

[The future of ESWL].

K U Köhrmann1, D Neisius, J Rassweiler.   

Abstract

With the introduction of the Dornier HM3 lithotripter, the successful history of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for noninvasive treatment of urinary stones began about 25 years ago. The development of newer lithotripters has not been able to improve clinical efficacy because the shock wave parameters specifically responsible for stone disintegration or tissue trauma and pain induction have not yet been identified. Actual research in lithotripter technology deals with modification of the focal point. The evolution of endoscopic procedures, ureterorenoscopy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy took longer but was more successful in terms of clinical efficacy. Nowadays, ESWL or an endoscopic procedure is offered as a reasonable option for most urinary stone cases. Therefore, economic aspects and the surgeon's expertise will become greater factors when a procedure is chosen. ESWL, with or without anaesthesia, will be an inherent part of future treatment modalities for urinary stones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18389207     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-008-1731-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  31 in total

1.  Reduction of tissue injury in shock-wave lithotripsy by using an acoustic diode.

Authors:  Songlin Zhu; Thomas Dreyer; Marko Liebler; Rainer Riedlinger; Glenn M Preminger; Pei Zhong
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Innovations in shock wave lithotripsy technology: updates in experimental studies.

Authors:  Yufeng Zhou; Franklin H Cocks; Glenn M Preminger; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Ultracal-30 gypsum artificial stones for research on the mechanisms of stone breakage in shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  James A McAteer; James C Williams; Robin O Cleveland; Javier Van Cauwelaert; Michael R Bailey; David A Lifshitz; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2005-12

Review 4.  Removal of ureteral stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic procedures. What can we learn from the literature in terms of results and treatment efforts?

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2005-05-29

5.  Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't.

Authors:  D L Sackett; W M Rosenberg; J A Gray; R B Haynes; W S Richardson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-01-13

6.  Dual pulse shock wave lithotripsy: in vitro and in vivo study.

Authors:  Achim M Loske; Francisco Fernández; Horacio Zendejas; Miguel Paredes; Eduardo Castaño-Tostado
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Diabetes mellitus and hypertension associated with shock wave lithotripsy of renal and proximal ureteral stones at 19 years of followup.

Authors:  Amy E Krambeck; Matthew T Gettman; Audrey L Rohlinger; Christine M Lohse; David E Patterson; Joseph W Segura
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Evaluation of a synchronous twin-pulse technique for shock wave lithotripsy: the first prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Khaled Z Sheir; Tarek A El-Diasty; Amani M Ismail
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  A new electromagnetic shock-wave generator "SLX-F2" with user-selectable dual focus size: ex vivo evaluation of renal injury.

Authors:  Rasmus Leistner; Gunnar Wendt-Nordahl; Rainer Grobholz; Maurice Stephan Michel; Ernst Marlinghaus; Kai Uwe Köhrmann; Peter Alken; Axel Häcker
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2007-05-05

10.  Kidney damage and renal functional changes are minimized by waveform control that suppresses cavitation in shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Andrew P Evan; Lynn R Willis; James A McAteer; Michael R Bailey; Bret A Connors; Youzhi Shao; James E Lingeman; James C Williams; Naomi S Fineberg; Lawrence A Crum
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  2 in total

1.  Management behaviors of the urology practitioners to the small lower calyceal stones: the results of a web-based survey.

Authors:  Ferhat Ates; Murat Zor; Omer Yılmaz; Murat Tuncer; Metin Ozturk; Cenk Gurbuz; Gokhan Atis; Orhan Koca; Asif Yildirim; Bilal Eryildirim; Eyup Veli Kucuk; Fehmi Narter; Temucin Senkul; Kemal Sarica
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Comparison of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of renal pelvic and proximal ureteral stones ≤2 cm in children.

Authors:  Yavuz Guler; Akif Erbin
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2020-10-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.