Literature DB >> 16838506

The effect of reflector geometry on the acoustic field and bubble dynamics produced by an electrohydraulic shock wave lithotripter.

Yufeng Zhou1, Pei Zhong.   

Abstract

A theoretical model for the propagation of shock wave from an axisymmetric reflector was developed by modifying the initial conditions for the conventional solution of a nonlinear parabolic wave equation (i.e., the Khokhlov-Zabolotskaya-Kuznestsov equation). The ellipsoidal reflector of an HM-3 lithotripter is modeled equivalently as a self-focusing spherically distributed pressure source. The pressure wave form generated by the spark discharge of the HM-3 electrode was measured by a fiber optic probe hydrophone and used as source conditions in the numerical calculation. The simulated pressure wave forms, accounting for the effects of diffraction, nonlinearity, and thermoviscous absorption in wave propagation and focusing, were compared with the measured results and a reasonably good agreement was found. Furthermore, the primary characteristics in the pressure wave forms produced by different reflector geometries, such as that produced by a reflector insert, can also be predicted by this model. It is interesting to note that when the interpulse delay time calculated by linear geometric model is less than about 1.5 micros, two pulses from the reflector insert and the uncovered bottom of the original HM-3 reflector will merge together. Coupling the simulated pressure wave form with the Gilmore model was carried out to evaluate the effect of reflector geometry on resultant bubble dynamics in a lithotripter field. Altogether, the equivalent reflector model was found to provide a useful tool for the prediction of pressure wave form generated in a lithotripter field. This model may be used to guide the design optimization of reflector geometries for improving the performance and safety of clinical lithotripters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16838506      PMCID: PMC1994997          DOI: 10.1121/1.2195074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  20 in total

1.  Dynamics of bubble oscillation in constrained media and mechanisms of vessel rupture in SWL.

Authors:  P Zhong; Y Zhou; S Zhu
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Current management of urolithiasis: progress or regress?

Authors:  Kurt Kerbl; Jamil Rehman; Jaime Landman; David Lee; Chandru Sundaram; Ralph V Clayman
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Suppression of large intraluminal bubble expansion in shock wave lithotripsy without compromising stone comminution: refinement of reflector geometry.

Authors:  Yufeng Zhou; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Theoretical predictions of the acoustic pressure generated by a shock wave lithotripter.

Authors:  A J Coleman; M J Choi; J E Saunders
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Modeling the Dornier HM3 lithotripter.

Authors:  T Christopher
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  A prospective randomized trial comparing 2 lithotriptors for stone disintegration and induced renal trauma.

Authors:  Samuel F Graber; Hansjörg Danuser; Werner W Hochreiter; Urs E Studer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  A theoretical study of cavitation generated by an extracorporeal shock wave lithotripter.

Authors:  C C Church
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Effects of shock wave lithotripsy on plasma and urinary levels of nitrite and adrenomedullin.

Authors:  Kemal Sarica; Ayse Balat; Ahmet Erbagci; Mustafa Cekmen; Muhittin Yurekli; Faruk Yagci
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2003-09-13

9.  A survey of the acoustic output of commercial extracorporeal shock wave lithotripters.

Authors:  A J Coleman; J E Saunders
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 10.  Current state and future developments of noninvasive treatment of human urinary stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  C G Chaussy; G J Fuchs
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  7 in total

1.  Reduction of bubble cavitation by modifying the diffraction wave from a lithotripter aperture.

Authors:  Yufeng Zhou
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  Effect of lithotripter focal width on stone comminution in shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Jun Qin; W Neal Simmons; Georgy Sankin; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Experimentally validated multiphysics computational model of focusing and shock wave formation in an electromagnetic lithotripter.

Authors:  Daniel E Fovargue; Sorin Mitran; Nathan B Smith; Georgy N Sankin; Walter N Simmons; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Shock-Induced Damage and Dynamic Fracture in Cylindrical Bodies Submerged in Liquid.

Authors:  S Cao; Y Zhang; D Liao; P Zhong; K G Wang
Journal:  Int J Solids Struct       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 3.900

5.  Assessment of shock wave lithotripters via cavitation potential.

Authors:  Jonathan I Iloreta; Yufeng Zhou; Georgy N Sankin; Pei Zhong; Andrew J Szeri
Journal:  Phys Fluids (1994)       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.521

6.  Improving the lens design and performance of a contemporary electromagnetic shock wave lithotripter.

Authors:  Andreas Neisius; Nathan B Smith; Georgy Sankin; Nicholas John Kuntz; John Francis Madden; Daniel E Fovargue; Sorin Mitran; Michael Eric Lipkin; Walter Neal Simmons; Glenn M Preminger; Pei Zhong
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Focusing of shock waves induced by optical breakdown in water.

Authors:  Georgy N Sankin; Yufeng Zhou; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.482

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.