Literature DB >> 9547924

Modulation detection by normal and hearing-impaired listeners.

S Lacher-Fougère1, L Demany.   

Abstract

In five normally hearing subjects and seven subjects with damaged cochleas, detection thresholds for sinusoidal frequency modulation (FM) and amplitude modulation (AM) were measured using 1 s stimuli with a 500 Hz carrier frequency (Fc) at a 'comfortable' loudness (given by subject-dependent SPLs and SLs). The modulation frequency (Fmod) was 2 Hz or 10 Hz. FM (but not AM) detection was poorer in the hearing-impaired group, especially when the hearing loss at Fc exceeded 50 dB. Fmod had a different effect on FM and AM detection. The corresponding interaction was essentially identical for the two groups of subjects. Previous studies strongly suggested that normal listeners use mainly neural phase-locking cues for the detection of FM when Fmod = 2 Hz, but mainly tonotopic cues when Fmod = 10 Hz. The present results suggest that cochlear damages reduce the usefulness of these two types of cues to an approximately equal degree.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9547924     DOI: 10.3109/00206099809072965

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiology        ISSN: 0020-6091


  14 in total

1.  Using individual differences to test the role of temporal and place cues in coding frequency modulation.

Authors:  Kelly L Whiteford; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Assessing the Role of Place and Timing Cues in Coding Frequency and Amplitude Modulation as a Function of Age.

Authors:  Kelly L Whiteford; Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-04-20

3.  Forward masking of frequency modulation.

Authors:  Andrew J Byrne; Magdalena Wojtczak; Neal F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Processing of temporal fine structure as a function of age.

Authors:  John H Grose; Sara K Mamo
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Interindividual variation of sensitivity to frequency modulation: its relation with click-evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Sho Otsuka; Shigeto Furukawa; Shimpei Yamagishi; Koich Hirota; Makio Kashino
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-02-07

6.  Frequency modulation detection as a measure of temporal processing: age-related monaural and binaural effects.

Authors:  John H Grose; Sara K Mamo
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  The effect of hearing impairment on the identification of speech that is modulated synchronously or asynchronously across frequency.

Authors:  Joseph W Hall; Emily Buss; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 8.  Conventional Amplification for Children and Adults with Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Lindsey E Jorgensen; Emily A Benson; Ryan W McCreery
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2018-10-26

Review 9.  The role of temporal fine structure processing in pitch perception, masking, and speech perception for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired people.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-10-15

10.  Effects of moderate cochlear hearing loss on the ability to benefit from temporal fine structure information in speech.

Authors:  Kathryn Hopkins; Brian C J Moore; Michael A Stone
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.