Literature DB >> 23145618

Forward masking of frequency modulation.

Andrew J Byrne1, Magdalena Wojtczak, Neal F Viemeister.   

Abstract

Forward masking of sinusoidal frequency modulation (FM) was measured with three types of maskers: FM, amplitude modulation (AM), and a masker created by combining the magnitude spectrum of an FM tone with random component phases. For the signal FM rates used (5, 20, and 40 Hz), an FM masker raised detection thresholds in terms of frequency deviation by a factor of about 5 relative to without a masker. The AM masker produced a much smaller effect, suggesting that FM-to-AM conversion did not contribute substantially to the FM forward masking. The modulation depth of an FM masker had a nonmonotonic effect, with maximal masking observed at an intermediate value within the range of possible depths, while the random-phase FM masker produced less masking, arguing against a spectrally-based explanation for FM forward masking. Broad FM-rate selectivity for forward masking was observed for both 4-kHz and 500-Hz carriers. Thresholds measured as a function of the masker-signal delay showed slow recovery from FM forward masking, with residual masking for delays up to 500 ms. The FM forward-masking effect resembles that observed for AM [Wojtczak and Viemeister (2005). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 188, 3198-3210] and may reflect modulation-rate selective neural adaptation to FM.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23145618      PMCID: PMC3505210          DOI: 10.1121/1.4754531

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  38 in total

1.  Detection of combined frequency and amplitude modulation.

Authors:  B C Moore; A Sek
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Detection of frequency modulation (FM) in the presence of a second FM tone.

Authors:  A S Wilson; J W Hall; J H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Modulation masking: effects of modulation frequency, depth, and phase.

Authors:  S P Bacon; D W Grantham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Frequency selectivity in amplitude-modulation detection.

Authors:  T Houtgast
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Modulation detection and discrimination with three-component signals.

Authors:  B W Edwards; N F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Discrimination of modulation type (amplitude modulation or frequency modulation) with and without background noise.

Authors:  B C Moore; A Sek
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Temporal modulation transfer functions for AM and FM stimuli in cat auditory cortex. Effects of carrier type, modulating waveform and intensity.

Authors:  J J Eggermont
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Evidence for a reappraisal of the psychophysical selective adaptation paradigm.

Authors:  D B Moody; D Cole; L M Davidson; W C Stebbins
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Selective adaptation to linear frequency-modulated sweeps: evidence for direction-specific FM channels?

Authors:  G H Wakefield; N F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Auditory time constants for off-frequency forward masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  D A Nelson; R Pavlov
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1989-06
View more
  4 in total

1.  The effects of unmodulated carrier fringes on the detection of frequency modulation.

Authors:  Andrew J Byrne; Neal F Viemeister; Mark A Stellmack
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Encoding frequency contrast in primate auditory cortex.

Authors:  Brian J Malone; Brian H Scott; Malcolm N Semple
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Forward masking of spectrotemporal modulation detection.

Authors:  Christopher Conroy; Andrew J Byrne; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Dissociable neural response signatures for slow amplitude and frequency modulation in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Molly J Henry; Jonas Obleser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.