Literature DB >> 24504749

Interindividual variation of sensitivity to frequency modulation: its relation with click-evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Sho Otsuka1, Shigeto Furukawa, Shimpei Yamagishi, Koich Hirota, Makio Kashino.   

Abstract

The frequency modulation detection limen (FMDL) with a low modulation rate has been used as a measure of the listener's sensitivity to the temporal fine structure of a stimulus, which is represented by the pattern of neural phase locking at the auditory periphery. An alternative to the phase locking cue, the excitation pattern cue, has been suggested to contribute to frequency modulation (FM) detection. If the excitation pattern cue has a significant contribution to low-rate FM detection, the functionality of cochlear mechanics underlying the excitation pattern should be reflected in low-rate FMDLs. This study explored the relationship between cochlear mechanics and low-rate FMDLs by evaluating physiological measures of cochlear functions, namely distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) and click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs). DPOAEs and CEOAEs reflect nonlinear cochlear gain. CEOAEs have been considered also to reflect the degree of irregularity, such as spatial variations in number or geometry of outer hair cells, on the basilar membrane. The irregularity profile could affect the reliability of the phase locking cue, thereby influencing the FMDLs. The features extracted from DPOAEs and CEOAEs, when combined, could account for more than 30 % of the inter-listener variation of low-rate FMDLs. This implies that both cochlear gain and irregularity on the basilar membrane have some influence on sensitivity to low-rate FM: the loss of cochlear gain or broader tuning might influence the excitation pattern cue, and the irregularity on the basilar membrane might disturb the ability to use the phase locking cue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24504749      PMCID: PMC3946142          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-013-0439-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  36 in total

Review 1.  The active cochlea.

Authors:  P Dallos
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Method to measure acoustic impedance and reflection coefficient.

Authors:  D H Keefe; R Ling; J C Bulen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  A review of otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  R Probst; B L Lonsbury-Martin; G K Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Sound calibration and distortion product otoacoustic emissions at high frequencies.

Authors:  J H Siegel; E T Hirohata
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Effects of carrier frequency and background noise on the detection of mixed modulation.

Authors:  B C Moore; A Sek
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Spatial cross-correlation. A proposed mechanism for acoustic pitch perception.

Authors:  G E Loeb; M W White; M M Merzenich
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.086

7.  Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system.

Authors:  D T Kemp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in a nonhuman primate. II. Cochlear anatomy.

Authors:  B L Lonsbury-Martin; G K Martin; R Probst; A C Coats
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  A comparison of transiently evoked and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans.

Authors:  R Probst; F P Harris
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.453

10.  Otoacoustic emissions in ears with hearing loss.

Authors:  R Probst; B L Lonsbury-Martin; G K Martin; A C Coats
Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol       Date:  1987 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.808

View more
  2 in total

1.  Relation Between Cochlear Mechanics and Performance of Temporal Fine Structure-Based Tasks.

Authors:  Sho Otsuka; Shigeto Furukawa; Shimpei Yamagishi; Koich Hirota; Makio Kashino
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-09-08

2.  The role of efferents in human auditory development: efferent inhibition predicts frequency discrimination in noise for children.

Authors:  Srikanta K Mishra
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 2.714

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.