Literature DB >> 9539433

Heterosis for viability, fecundity, and male fertility in Drosophila melanogaster: comparison of mutational and standing variation.

J D Fry1, S L Heinsohn, T F Mackay.   

Abstract

If genetic variation for fitness traits in natural populations ("standing" variation) is maintained by recurrent mutation, then quantitative-genetic properties of standing variation should resemble those of newly arisen mutations. One well-known property of standing variation for fitness traits is inbreeding depression, with its converse of heterosis or hybrid vigor. We measured heterosis for three fitness traits, pre-adult viability, female fecundity, and male fertility, among a set of inbred Drosophilia melanogaster lines recently derived from the wild, and also among a set of lines that had been allowed to accumulate spontaneous mutations for over 200 generations. The inbred lines but not the mutation-accumulation (MA) lines showed heterosis for pre-adult viability. Both sets of lines showed heterosis for female fecundity, but heterosis for male fertility was weak or absent. Crosses among a subset of the MA lines showed that they were strongly differentiated for male fertility, with the differences inherited in autosomal fashion; the absence of heterosis for male fertility among the MA lines was therefore not caused by an absence of mutations affecting this trait. Crosses among the inbred lines also gave some, albeit equivocal, evidence for male fertility variation. The contrast between the results for female fecundity and those for male fertility suggests that mutations affecting different fitness traits may differ in their average dominance properties, and that such differences may be reflected in properties of standing variation. The strong differentiation among the MA lines in male fertility further suggests that mutations affecting this trait occur at a high rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9539433      PMCID: PMC1460047     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  26 in total

1.  The Experimental Assessment of Fitness in Drosophila. II. a Comparison of Competitive and Noncompetitive Measures.

Authors:  D S Haymer; D L Hartl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Spontaneous and ethyl methanesulfonate-induced mutations controlling viability in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Homozygous effect of polygenic mutations.

Authors:  O Ohnishi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Comparing mutational variabilities.

Authors:  D Houle; B Morikawa; M Lynch
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Mutations affecting fitness in Drosophila populations.

Authors:  M J Simmons; J F Crow
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 16.830

Review 5.  Natural selection and the heritability of fitness components.

Authors:  T A Mousseau; D A Roff
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Whipple's arthritis: direct detection of Tropheryma whippelii in synovial fluid and tissue.

Authors:  J D O'Duffy; W L Griffing; C Y Li; M F Abdelmalek; D H Persing
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1999-04

7.  Genotype-environment interactions and the estimation of the genomic mutation rate in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A S Kondrashov; D Houle
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1994-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  A reevaluation of data from competitive tests shows high levels of heterosis in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  B D Latter; J A Sved
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  An estimate of heterosis in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J A Sved
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1971-08       Impact factor: 1.588

10.  Genetic variation and genetic load due to the male reproductive component of fitness in Drosophila.

Authors:  J G Brittnacher
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1981 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  8 in total

1.  Rapid evolution of male-biased gene expression in Drosophila.

Authors:  Colin D Meiklejohn; John Parsch; José M Ranz; Daniel L Hartl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Quantitative trait symmetry independent of Hsp90 buffering: distinct modes of genetic canalization and developmental stability.

Authors:  Claire C Milton; Brandon Huynh; Philip Batterham; Suzanne L Rutherford; Ary A Hoffmann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-10-31       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Variations at a quantitative trait locus (QTL) affect development of behavior in lead-exposed Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Helmut V B Hirsch; Debra Possidente; Sarah Averill; Tamira Palmetto Despain; Joel Buytkins; Valerie Thomas; W Paul Goebel; Asante Shipp-Hilts; Diane Wilson; Kurt Hollocher; Bernard Possidente; Greg Lnenicka; Douglas M Ruden
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 4.294

4.  Deficiency mapping of quantitative trait loci affecting longevity in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  E G Pasyukova; C Vieira; T F Mackay
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Susceptibility of the male fitness phenotype to spontaneous mutation.

Authors:  Martin A Mallet; Christopher M Kimber; Adam K Chippindale
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Aging studies in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Yaning Sun; Jason Yolitz; Cecilia Wang; Edward Spangler; Ming Zhan; Sige Zou
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2013

7.  Control of canalization and evolvability by Hsp90.

Authors:  Claire C Milton; Christina M Ulane; Suzannah Rutherford
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Environmental stress and the effects of mutation.

Authors:  Santiago F Elena; J Arjan G M de Visser
Journal:  J Biol       Date:  2003-06-26
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.