Literature DB >> 9514066

The use of videotaped information in cancer genetic counselling: a randomized evaluation study.

A Cull1, H Miller, T Porterfield, J Mackay, E D Anderson, C M Steel, R A Elton.   

Abstract

A video of introductory information about inherited susceptibility to breast cancer was made in consultation with clinicians in four Scottish cancer family clinics. One hundred and twenty-eight women, newly referred for breast cancer risk counselling were randomized to receive the video before (n = 66) or after (n = 62) counselling. Data were collected before randomization at clinic and by postal follow-up at 1 month. The Video Before group had shorter consultations with the breast surgeon (mean = 11.8 min+/-5.4 vs 14.6+/-7.2 for the Video After group). There was no difference between the groups in the accuracy of their risk estimate after counselling, although the Video Before group scored higher for self-reported (Z= 3.65, d.f. = 1, P < 0.01) and objectively assessed understanding (Z= 2.91, d.f. = 1, P < 0.01). At 1 month follow-up, the Video Before group were less likely to underestimate their risk estimate (38% vs 18%; chi2 = 4.62, d.f. = 1, P< 0.05), but there was then no difference between the groups in subjective or objective understanding. Use of the video was not associated with increased distress (GHQ, Spielberger State Anxiety) and was associated with greater satisfaction with the information given at the clinic. This study supports the value of videotape as a method of giving information to prepare women for breast cancer risk counselling. Observations of misunderstandings and distress emphasize the video should be seen as an aid to, not a substitute, for communications at the clinic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9514066      PMCID: PMC2149970          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1998.135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  8 in total

1.  Women's need for information before attending genetic counselling for familial breast or ovarian cancer: a questionnaire, interview, and observational study.

Authors:  N Hallowell; F Murton; H Statham; J M Green; M P Richards
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-01-25

2.  Enhanced decision-making: the use of a videotape decision-aid for patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  M M Schapira; C Meade; A B Nattinger
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  1997-02

3.  Effects of individualized breast cancer risk counseling: a randomized trial.

Authors:  C Lerman; E Lustbader; B Rimer; M Daly; S Miller; C Sands; A Balshem
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1995-02-15       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Psychological distress and surveillance behaviors of women with a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  K M Kash; J C Holland; M S Halper; D G Miller
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1992-01-01       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Participation in a women's breast cancer risk counseling trial. Who participates? Who declines? High Risk Breast Cancer Consortium.

Authors:  B K Rimer; J M Schildkraut; C Lerman; T H Lin; J Audrain
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1996-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Perception of risk in women with a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  D G Evans; L D Burnell; P Hopwood; A Howell
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Familial breast cancer: a controlled study of risk perception, psychological morbidity and health beliefs in women attending for genetic counselling.

Authors:  S Lloyd; M Watson; B Waites; L Meyer; R Eeles; S Ebbs; A Tylee
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  The impact of genetic counselling on risk perception in women with a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  D G Evans; V Blair; R Greenhalgh; P Hopwood; A Howell
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 7.640

  8 in total
  38 in total

1.  Assessment of the use and feasibility of video to supplement the genetic counseling process: a cancer genetic counseling perspective.

Authors:  J E Axilbund; L A Hamby; D B Thompson; S J Olsen; C A Griffin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Short- and long-term impact of receiving genetic mutation results in women at increased risk for hereditary breast cancer.

Authors:  Jacqueline Lim; Mariette Macluran; Melanie Price; Barbara Bennett; Phyllis Butow
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Psychosocial conditions of women awaiting genetic counseling: a population-based study.

Authors:  Ellen M Mikkelsen; Lone Sunde; Christoffer Johansen; Søren P Johnsen
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Explaining Mendelian inheritance in genetic consultations: an IPR study of counselor and counselee experiences.

Authors:  Theodora Gale; Sara Pasalodos-Sanchez; Lauren Kerzin-Storrar; Georgina Hall; Rhona MacLeod
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  A pre-visit tailored website enhances counselees' realistic expectations and knowledge and fulfils information needs for breast cancer genetic counselling.

Authors:  Akke Albada; Sandra van Dulmen; Dick Lindhout; Jozien M Bensing; Margreet G E M Ausems
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Factors affecting recall of different types of personal genetic information about Alzheimer's disease risk: the REVEAL study.

Authors:  Andria G Besser; Saskia C Sanderson; J Scott Roberts; Clara A Chen; Kurt D Christensen; Denise M Lautenbach; L Adrienne Cupples; Robert C Green
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 2.000

7.  Patient outcomes associated with group and individual genetic counseling formats.

Authors:  Erin Rothwell; Wendy Kohlmann; Kory Jasperson; Amanda Gammon; Bob Wong; Anita Kinney
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 8.  Interventions to improve patient education regarding multifactorial genetic conditions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Katherine G Meilleur; Marguerite T Littleton-Kearney
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2009-02-15       Impact factor: 2.802

9.  Decision aids for organ transplant candidates.

Authors:  Elisa J Gordon; Michael G Ison
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.799

10.  A multimedia mobile phone-based youth smoking cessation intervention: findings from content development and piloting studies.

Authors:  Robyn Whittaker; Ralph Maddison; Hayden McRobbie; Chris Bullen; Simon Denny; Enid Dorey; Mary Ellis-Pegler; Jaco van Rooyen; Anthony Rodgers
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.