Literature DB >> 7707420

Effects of individualized breast cancer risk counseling: a randomized trial.

C Lerman1, E Lustbader, B Rimer, M Daly, S Miller, C Sands, A Balshem.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that a majority of women with a family history of breast cancer have exaggerated perceptions of their own risk of this disease and experience excessive anxiety. In response to the need to communicate more accurate risk information to these women, specialized programs for breast cancer risk counseling have been initiated in medical centers across the United States.
PURPOSE: Our purpose was 1) to evaluate the impact of a standardized protocol for individualized breast cancer risk counseling on comprehension of personal risk among first-degree relatives of index breast cancer patients and 2) to identify women most and least likely to benefit from such counseling.
METHODS: This study is a prospective randomized trial comparing individualized breast cancer risk counseling to general health counseling (control). We studied 200 women aged 35 years and older who had a family history of breast cancer in a first-degree relative. Women with a personal history of cancer were excluded. Risk comprehension was assessed as the concordance between perceived "subjective" lifetime breast cancer risk and estimated "objective" lifetime risk.
RESULTS: The results of logistic regression analysis showed that women who received risk counseling were significantly more likely to improve their risk comprehension, compared with women in the control condition (odds ratio [OR] = 3.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.3-9.5; P = .01). However, in both groups, about two thirds of women continued to overestimate their lifetime risks substantially following counseling. Examination of subjects by treatment interaction effects indicated that risk counseling did not produce improved comprehension among the large proportion of women who had high levels of anxious preoccupation with breast cancer at base line (P = .02). In addition, white women were less likely to benefit than African-American women (OR = 0.34; 95% CI = 0.11-0.99; P = .05).
CONCLUSION: Efforts to counsel women about their breast cancer risks are not likely to be effective unless their breast cancer anxieties are also addressed. IMPLICATIONS: Attention to the psychological aspects of breast cancer risk will be critical in the development of risk-counseling programs that incorporate testing for the recently cloned breast cancer susceptibility gene, BRCA1 (and BRCA2 when that gene has also been cloned).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7707420     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/87.4.286

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  115 in total

1.  Psychological and screening profiles of first-degree relatives of prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  S M Miller; M A Diefenbach; L K Kruus; D Watkins-Bruner; G E Hanks; P F Engstrom
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2001-06

2.  Effects of integrated risk counseling for cancer and cardiovascular disease in African Americans.

Authors:  Chanita Hughes Halbert; Scarlett Bellamy; Marjorie Bowman; Vanessa Briggs; Ernestine Delmoor; Joseph Purnell; Rodney Rogers; Benita Weathers; Shiriki Kumanyika
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.798

3.  Direct-to-Consumer genetic testing: what are we talking about?

Authors:  Meredith Weaver; Toni I Pollin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 4.  Effects of communicating individual risks in screening programmes: Cochrane systematic review.

Authors:  Adrian Edwards; Silvana Unigwe; Glyn Elwyn; Kerenza Hood
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-09-27

5.  A tailored intervention to aid decision-making about hormone replacement therapy.

Authors:  Colleen M McBride; Lori A Bastian; Susan Halabi; Laura Fish; Isaac M Lipkus; Hayden B Bosworth; Barbara K Rimer; Ilene C Siegler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Cognitive processing variables in breast cancer: worry and distress at the end of treatment.

Authors:  Gema Costa-Requena; Ana Rodríguez; Rosina Fernández; Elisabet Palomera; Francisco L Gil
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Perceived risk following melanoma genetic testing: a 2-year prospective study distinguishing subjective estimates from recall.

Authors:  Lisa G Aspinwall; Jennifer M Taber; Wendy Kohlmann; Samantha L Leaf; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Effects of patient-provider race concordance and smoking status on lung cancer risk perception accuracy among African-Americans.

Authors:  Susan Persky; Kimberly A Kaphingst; Vincent C Allen; Ibrahim Senay
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2013-06

9.  A randomized trial of three videos that differ in the framing of information about mammography in women 40 to 49 years old.

Authors:  Carmen L Lewis; Michael P Pignone; Stacey L Sheridan; Stephen M Downs; Linda S Kinsinger
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Perceptions, knowledge, and satisfaction with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among young women with breast cancer: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Shoshana M Rosenberg; Michaela S Tracy; Meghan E Meyer; Karen Sepucha; Shari Gelber; Judi Hirshfield-Bartek; Susan Troyan; Monica Morrow; Lidia Schapira; Steven E Come; Eric P Winer; Ann H Partridge
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 25.391

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.