Literature DB >> 15612172

Short- and long-term impact of receiving genetic mutation results in women at increased risk for hereditary breast cancer.

Jacqueline Lim1, Mariette Macluran, Melanie Price, Barbara Bennett, Phyllis Butow.   

Abstract

Forty-seven unaffected women from high-risk breast cancer families who had received results for hereditary breast/ovarian predisposition genes between 1 month and 5 years ago were interviewed regarding their experiences. Women responded to open-ended questions. The initial emotional turmoil reported by most was generally short lived. However, the impact of genetic testing went beyond the individual to the extended family and social context, particularly in the short-term. A common theme was the difficulty associated with divulging a result to family members, who were also adjusting to their own result. The majority of carriers reported advantages that were both physical (options for surveillance programs and prophylactic surgery) and emotional (reduced uncertainty, increased awareness of options and knowledge about risk, preparation time). Most carriers reported no change in lifestyle although some reported discovering their mutation status as a positive life-changing experience. Implications for genetic counseling and further research are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15612172     DOI: 10.1023/b:jogc.0000018822.56297.a6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  20 in total

1.  Intention to undergo prophylactic bilateral mastectomy in women at increased risk of developing hereditary breast cancer.

Authors:  B Meiser; P Butow; M Friedlander; V Schnieden; M Gattas; J Kirk; G Suthers; E Haan; K Tucker
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  The virtue of qualitative and quantitative research.

Authors:  T S Inui
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1996-11-01       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  A descriptive study of BRCA1 testing and reactions to disclosure of test results.

Authors:  H T Lynch; S J Lemon; C Durham; S T Tinley; C Connolly; J F Lynch; J Surdam; E Orinion; S Slominski-Caster; P Watson; C Lerman; P Tonin; G Lenoir; O Serova; S Narod
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1997-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Psychological impact of genetic testing in women from high-risk breast cancer families.

Authors:  B Meiser; P Butow; M Friedlander; A Barratt; V Schnieden; M Watson; J Brown; K Tucker
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 9.162

5.  Psychosocial effects of living with an increased risk of breast cancer: an exploratory study using telephone focus groups.

Authors:  S Appleton; A Fry; G Rees; R Rush; A Cull
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.894

6.  The use of videotaped information in cancer genetic counselling: a randomized evaluation study.

Authors:  A Cull; H Miller; T Porterfield; J Mackay; E D Anderson; C M Steel; R A Elton
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  DNA screening for breast/ovarian cancer susceptibility based on linked markers. A family study.

Authors:  H T Lynch; P Watson; T A Conway; J F Lynch; S M Slominski-Caster; S A Narod; J Feunteun; G Lenoir
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1993-09-13

8.  American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-04-11       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  Psychological outcomes and risk perception after genetic testing and counselling in breast cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Phyllis N Butow; Elizabeth A Lobb; Bettina Meiser; Alexandra Barratt; Katherine M Tucker
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2003-01-20       Impact factor: 7.738

10.  The impact of genetic counselling about breast cancer risk on women's risk perceptions and levels of distress.

Authors:  A Cull; E D Anderson; S Campbell; J Mackay; E Smyth; M Steel
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Specific psychosocial issues of individuals undergoing genetic counseling for cancer - a literature review.

Authors:  Willem Eijzenga; Daniela E E Hahn; Neil K Aaronson; Irma Kluijt; Eveline M A Bleiker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 2.  How to establish a high-risk cancer genetics clinic: limitations and successes.

Authors:  Mary B Daly; Beth Stearman; Agnes Masny; Elaine Sein; Susan Mazzoni
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 3.  How risk is perceived, constructed and interpreted by clients in clinical genetics, and the effects on decision making: systematic review.

Authors:  Stephanie Sivell; Glyn Elwyn; Clara L Gaff; Angus J Clarke; Rachel Iredale; Chris Shaw; Joanna Dundon; Hazel Thornton; Adrian Edwards
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Development and validation of an instrument to measure the impact of genetic testing on self-concept in Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  M J Esplen; N Stuckless; S Gallinger; M Aronson; H Rothenmund; K Semotiuk; J Stokes; C Way; J Green; K Butler; H V Petersen; J Wong
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 4.438

5.  Impact of oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy: a patient perspective.

Authors:  Barbara K Bennett; Susanna B Park; Cindy S-Y Lin; Michael L Friedlander; Matthew C Kiernan; David Goldstein
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 6.  Chronic diseases influence major life changing decisions: a new domain in quality of life research.

Authors:  Zu Bhatti; Ms Salek; Ay Finlay
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Experiences and decisions that motivate women at increased risk of breast cancer to participate in an experimental screening program.

Authors:  Michelle Proulx; Marie-Dominique Beaulieu; Christine Loignon; Marie-Hélène Mayrand; Christine Maugard; Nathalie Bellavance; Diane Provencher
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  A family genetic risk communication framework: guiding tool development in genetics health services.

Authors:  Miriam E Wiens; Brenda J Wilson; Christina Honeywell; Holly Etchegary
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-01-15

9.  The FAP self-concept scale (adult form).

Authors:  Mary Jane Esplen; Noreen Stuckless; Terri Berk; Kate Butler; Steve Gallinger
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  The relationship between psychological distress and personality in women from families with familial breast/ovarian or hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer in the absence of demonstrated mutations.

Authors:  Amy Østertun Geirdal; Alv A Dahl
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.