Literature DB >> 22057473

Patient outcomes associated with group and individual genetic counseling formats.

Erin Rothwell1, Wendy Kohlmann, Kory Jasperson, Amanda Gammon, Bob Wong, Anita Kinney.   

Abstract

Identifying new methods to deliver cancer genetic counseling (GC) are needed to meet the growing interest in BRCA1/2 testing. The goal of this pilot feasibility study was designed to test the initial acceptability of group GC on selected patient outcomes (satisfaction, distress, perceived control) in a breast/ovarian cancer genetics clinic setting. Sixty-five participants at increased risk for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer (HBOC) agreed to participate in self-selected individual or group GC appointments. Forty-nine participants completed all study questionnaires and were included in the analyses. There were significant improvements for participants in both the individual and group GC formats with regard to perceived personal control, general psychological distress and cancer-specific psychological distress scores. Participants in both the individual and group formats reported high satisfaction scores on the Genetic Counseling Satisfaction Scale. Study results suggest that group GC may be feasible and acceptable to high-risk women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22057473     DOI: 10.1007/s10689-011-9486-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  45 in total

1.  Coping style, psychological distress, risk perception, and satisfaction in subjects attending genetic counselling for hereditary cancer.

Authors:  K Nordin; A Lidén; M Hansson; R Rosenquist; G Berglund
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  Theorizing about social support and health communication in a prostate cancer support group.

Authors:  Michael Irvin Arrington
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2010

3.  The perceived personal control (PPC) questionnaire as an outcome of genetic counseling: reliability and validity of the instrument.

Authors:  Ellen M A Smets; Arwen H Pieterse; Cora M Aalfs; Margreet G E M Ausems; Alexandra M van Dulmen
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2006-04-15       Impact factor: 2.802

4.  Impact of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation testing on psychologic distress in a clinic-based sample.

Authors:  Marc D Schwartz; Beth N Peshkin; Chanita Hughes; David Main; Claudine Isaacs; Caryn Lerman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Education about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: patient preferences for a computer program or genetic counselor.

Authors:  M J Green; A M McInerney; B B Biesecker; N Fost
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2001-09-15

6.  Controlled trial of pretest education approaches to enhance informed decision-making for BRCA1 gene testing.

Authors:  C Lerman; B Biesecker; J L Benkendorf; J Kerner; A Gomez-Caminero; C Hughes; M M Reed
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1997-01-15       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  BRCA1 testing with definitive results: a prospective study of psychological distress in a large clinic-based sample.

Authors:  Jon G Reichelt; Ketil Heimdal; Pål Møller; Alv A Dahl
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Improving quality of life in men with prostate cancer: a randomized controlled trial of group education interventions.

Authors:  Stephen J Lepore; Vicki S Helgeson; David T Eton; Richard Schulz
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.267

9.  Quality of communication during telephone triage at Dutch out-of-hours centres.

Authors:  Hay P Derkx; Jan-Joost E Rethans; Bas H Maiburg; Ron A Winkens; Arno M Muijtjens; Harrie G van Rooij; J André Knottnerus
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2008-10-08

10.  Patient satisfaction with cancer genetic counseling: a psychometric analysis of the Genetic Counseling Satisfaction Scale.

Authors:  Tiffani A DeMarco; Beth N Peshkin; Bryn D Mars; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.537

View more
  9 in total

1.  Telegenetics use in presymptomatic genetic counselling: patient evaluations on satisfaction and quality of care.

Authors:  Ellen Otten; Erwin Birnie; Adelita V Ranchor; Irene M van Langen
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Models of service delivery for cancer genetic risk assessment and counseling.

Authors:  Angela M Trepanier; Dawn C Allain
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-10-26       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: successful systematic implementation of a group approach to genetic counselling.

Authors:  Patrick R Benusiglio; Marina Di Maria; Leila Dorling; Anne Jouinot; Antoine Poli; Sophie Villebasse; Marine Le Mentec; Béatrice Claret; Diane Boinon; Olivier Caron
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  A pilot randomized clinical trial evaluating the impact of genetic counseling for serious mental illnesses.

Authors:  Catriona Hippman; Andrea Ringrose; Angela Inglis; Joanna Cheek; Arianne Y K Albert; Ronald Remick; William G Honer; Jehannine C Austin
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.384

5.  A group approach to genetic counselling of cardiomyopathy patients: satisfaction and psychological outcomes sufficient for further implementation.

Authors:  Ellen Otten; Erwin Birnie; Adelita V Ranchor; J Peter van Tintelen; Irene M van Langen
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 6.  Alternate Service Delivery Models in Cancer Genetic Counseling: A Mini-Review.

Authors:  Adam Hudson Buchanan; Alanna Kulchak Rahm; Janet L Williams
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 7.  Next-Generation Service Delivery: A Scoping Review of Patient Outcomes Associated with Alternative Models of Genetic Counseling and Genetic Testing for Hereditary Cancer.

Authors:  Jeanna M McCuaig; Susan Randall Armel; Melanie Care; Alexandra Volenik; Raymond H Kim; Kelly A Metcalfe
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  Population screening for BRCA1/BRCA2 founder mutations in Ashkenazi Jews: proactive recruitment compared with self-referral.

Authors:  Sari Lieberman; Ariela Tomer; Avi Ben-Chetrit; Oded Olsha; Shalom Strano; Rachel Beeri; Sivan Koka; Hila Fridman; Karen Djemal; Itzhak Glick; Todd Zalut; Shlomo Segev; Miri Sklair; Bella Kaufman; Amnon Lahad; Aviad Raz; Ephrat Levy-Lahad
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Group plus "mini" individual pre-test genetic counselling sessions for hereditary cancer shorten provider time and improve patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Jaclyn Hynes; Andrée MacMillan; Sara Fernandez; Karen Jacob; Shannon Carter; Sarah Predham; Holly Etchegary; Lesa Dawson
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 2.857

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.