Literature DB >> 9022494

Women's need for information before attending genetic counselling for familial breast or ovarian cancer: a questionnaire, interview, and observational study.

N Hallowell1, F Murton, H Statham, J M Green, M P Richards.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe women's information needs prior to genetic counselling for familial breast or ovarian cancer.
DESIGN: Prospective study including semistructured telephone interviews before genetic counselling, observations of consultations, completion of postal questionnaires, and face-to face interviews within two months of counselling.
SUBJECTS: 46 women attending genetic counselling for familial breast or ovarian cancer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Subjects' understanding of process and content of genetic counselling before attending and attitudes about their preparation for the counselling session.
RESULTS: Although all women interviewed before the clinic expected to discuss their risk of developing cancer and risk management options, there was evidence of a lack of knowledge about the process and content of genetic counselling, 17 (37%) women said they did not know what else would happen. Most women interviewed after counselling viewed it positively, but 26 (65%) felt they had been inadequately prepared and 11 (28%) felt that their lack of preparation meant that they could not be given an accurate estimation of their risk of cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: Some women felt that they did not obtain optimum benefit from genetic counselling because they were inadequately prepared for it. We suggest that cancer family history clinics should provide women with written information about the process and content of genetic counselling before their clinic attendance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9022494      PMCID: PMC2125728          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.314.7076.281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  41 in total

1.  Client perceptions of the impact of genetic counseling: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Patricia McCarthy Veach; Sarah E Truesdell; Bonnie S LeRoy; Dianne M Bartels
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Exploring genetic counseling communication patterns: the role of teaching and counseling approaches.

Authors:  Lee Ellington; Bonnie J Baty; Jamie McDonald; Vickie Venne; Adrian Musters; Debra Roter; William Dudley; Robert T Croyle
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Knowledge and expectations of women undergoing cancer genetic risk assessment: a qualitative analysis of free-text questionnaire comments.

Authors:  C Phelps; F Wood; P Bennett; K Brain; J Gray
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Psychosocial conditions of women awaiting genetic counseling: a population-based study.

Authors:  Ellen M Mikkelsen; Lone Sunde; Christoffer Johansen; Søren P Johnsen
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Choosing not to undergo predictive genetic testing for hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes: expanding our understanding of decliners and declining.

Authors:  Louise A Keogh; Heather Niven; Alison Rutstein; Louisa Flander; Clara Gaff; Mark Jenkins
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2017-02-14

Review 6.  Assessment of the content and process of genetic counseling: a critical review of empirical studies.

Authors:  Bettina Meiser; Jennifer Irle; Elizabeth Lobb; Kristine Barlow-Stewart
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-09-13       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Use and evaluation of an individually tailored website for counselees prior to breast cancer genetic counseling.

Authors:  Akke Albada; Margreet G E M Ausems; Roel Otten; Jozien M Bensing; Sandra van Dulmen
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  A pre-visit tailored website enhances counselees' realistic expectations and knowledge and fulfils information needs for breast cancer genetic counselling.

Authors:  Akke Albada; Sandra van Dulmen; Dick Lindhout; Jozien M Bensing; Margreet G E M Ausems
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Cancer genetic predisposition: information needs of patients irrespective of risk level.

Authors:  Alison Metcalfe; Julie Werrett; Lucy Burgess; Cyril Chapman; Collette Clifford
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  Development of E-info gene(ca): a website providing computer-tailored information and question prompt prior to breast cancer genetic counseling.

Authors:  Akke Albada; Sandra van Dulmen; Roel Otten; Jozien M Bensing; Margreet G E M Ausems
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.