Literature DB >> 9510507

Separate and variably shaped chromosome arm domains are disclosed by chromosome arm painting in human cell nuclei.

S Dietzel1, A Jauch, D Kienle, G Qu, H Holtgreve-Grez, R Eils, C Münkel, M Bittner, P S Meltzer, J M Trent, T Cremer.   

Abstract

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with microdissection probes from human chromosomes 3 and 6 was applied to visualize arm and subregional band domains in human amniotic fluid cell nuclei. Confocal laser scanning microscopy and quantitative three-dimensional image analysis showed a pronounced variability of p- and q-arm domain arrangements and shapes. Apparent intermingling of neighbouring arm domains was limited to the domain surface. Three-dimensional distance measurements with pter and qter probes supported a high variability of chromosome territory folding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9510507     DOI: 10.1023/a:1009262223693

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosome Res        ISSN: 0967-3849            Impact factor:   5.239


  33 in total

1.  Fluorescence in situ hybridization of YAC clones after Alu-PCR amplification.

Authors:  C Lengauer; E D Green; T Cremer
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.736

2.  Cytogenetic analysis by in situ hybridization with fluorescently labeled nucleic acid probes.

Authors:  D Pinkel; J W Gray; B Trask; G van den Engh; J Fuscoe; H van Dekken
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1986

3.  The relationship of radiation-induced dicentric yield to chromosome arm number.

Authors:  J R Savage; D G Papworth
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  Delineation of individual human chromosomes in metaphase and interphase cells by in situ suppression hybridization using recombinant DNA libraries.

Authors:  P Lichter; T Cremer; J Borden; L Manuelidis; D C Ward
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Application of confocal laser microscopy and three-dimensional Voronoi diagrams for volume and surface estimates of interphase chromosomes.

Authors:  R Eils; E Bertin; K Saracoglu; B Rinke; E Schröck; F Parazza; Y Usson; M Robert-Nicoud; E H Stelzer; J M Chassery
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 1.758

6.  Chromosome arm painting probes.

Authors:  X Y Guan; H Zhang; M Bittner; Y Jiang; P Meltzer; J Trent
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  A random-walk/giant-loop model for interphase chromosomes.

Authors:  R K Sachs; G van den Engh; B Trask; H Yokota; J E Hearst
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  A simple method of reducing the fading of immunofluorescence during microscopy.

Authors:  G D Johnson; G M Nogueira Araujo
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.303

9.  Unscheduled DNA synthesis after partial UV irradiation of the cell nucleus. Distribution in interphase and metaphase.

Authors:  C Zorn; C Cremer; T Cremer; J Zimmer
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 3.905

10.  Specific staining of human chromosomes in Chinese hamster x man hybrid cell lines demonstrates interphase chromosome territories.

Authors:  M Schardin; T Cremer; H D Hager; M Lang
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.132

View more
  28 in total

Review 1.  Higher levels of organization in the interphase nucleus of cycling and differentiated cells.

Authors:  A R Leitch
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 11.056

2.  Modifiers of terminal deficiency-associated position effect variegation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Kathryn M Donaldson; Amy Lui; Gary H Karpen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Visualization and tracking of single protein molecules in the cell nucleus.

Authors:  T Kues; R Peters; U Kubitscheck
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  The DNA-based structure of human chromosome 5 in interphase.

Authors:  Johannes Lemke; Jan Claussen; Susanne Michel; Ilse Chudoba; Peter Mühlig; Martin Westermann; Karl Sperling; Nikolai Rubtsov; Ulrich-Walter Grummt; Peter Ullmann; Katrin Kromeyer-Hauschild; Thomas Liehr; Uwe Claussen
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-10-07       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 5.  Chromosome territories.

Authors:  Thomas Cremer; Marion Cremer
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 10.005

6.  Preferential accessibility to specific genomic loci for the repair of double-strand breaks in human cells.

Authors:  Hélène D'Anjou; Catherine Chabot; Pierre Chartrand
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-11-23       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Chromosome architecture in the decondensing human sperm nucleus.

Authors:  Olga Mudrak; Nikolai Tomilin; Andrei Zalensky
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 8.  The genome and the nucleus: a marriage made by evolution. Genome organisation and nuclear architecture.

Authors:  Helen A Foster; Joanna M Bridger
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2005-10-15       Impact factor: 4.316

9.  The pattern of chromosome folding in interphase is outlined by the linear gene density profile.

Authors:  Alexander M Boutanaev; Lyudmila M Mikhaylova; Dmitry I Nurminsky
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Transcription of a donor enhances its use during double-strand break-induced gene conversion in human cells.

Authors:  Ezra Schildkraut; Cheryl A Miller; Jac A Nickoloff
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.