Literature DB >> 15562005

Preferential accessibility to specific genomic loci for the repair of double-strand breaks in human cells.

Hélène D'Anjou1, Catherine Chabot, Pierre Chartrand.   

Abstract

The dynamic organization of the human genome in the nucleus is gaining recognition as a determining factor in its functional regulation. In order to be expressed, replicated or repaired, a genomic locus has to be present at the right place at the right time. In the present study, we have investigated the choice of a double-strand break (DSB) repair partner for a given genomic loci in an ATM-deficient human fibroblast cell line. We found that partner choice is restricted such that a given genomic locus preferentially uses certain sites in the genome to repair itself. These preferential sites can be in the vicinity of the damage site or megabases away or on other chromosomes entirely, while potential sites closer to the break along the length of the chromosome can be ignored. Moreover, there can be more than a 10-fold difference in usage between repair sites located only 10 kb apart. Interestingly, arms of a given chromosome are less accessible to one another than to other chromosomes. Altogether, these results indicate that the accessibility between genomic sites in the human genome during DSB repair is specific and conserved in a cell population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15562005      PMCID: PMC534631          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkh952

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  30 in total

1.  A double-strand break in a chromosomal LINE element can be repaired by gene conversion with various endogenous LINE elements in mouse cells.

Authors:  A Tremblay; M Jasin; P Chartrand
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 2.  Partners and pathwaysrepairing a double-strand break.

Authors:  J E Haber
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 11.639

3.  Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome.

Authors:  E S Lander; L M Linton; B Birren; C Nusbaum; M C Zody; J Baldwin; K Devon; K Dewar; M Doyle; W FitzHugh; R Funke; D Gage; K Harris; A Heaford; J Howland; L Kann; J Lehoczky; R LeVine; P McEwan; K McKernan; J Meldrim; J P Mesirov; C Miranda; W Morris; J Naylor; C Raymond; M Rosetti; R Santos; A Sheridan; C Sougnez; Y Stange-Thomann; N Stojanovic; A Subramanian; D Wyman; J Rogers; J Sulston; R Ainscough; S Beck; D Bentley; J Burton; C Clee; N Carter; A Coulson; R Deadman; P Deloukas; A Dunham; I Dunham; R Durbin; L French; D Grafham; S Gregory; T Hubbard; S Humphray; A Hunt; M Jones; C Lloyd; A McMurray; L Matthews; S Mercer; S Milne; J C Mullikin; A Mungall; R Plumb; M Ross; R Shownkeen; S Sims; R H Waterston; R K Wilson; L W Hillier; J D McPherson; M A Marra; E R Mardis; L A Fulton; A T Chinwalla; K H Pepin; W R Gish; S L Chissoe; M C Wendl; K D Delehaunty; T L Miner; A Delehaunty; J B Kramer; L L Cook; R S Fulton; D L Johnson; P J Minx; S W Clifton; T Hawkins; E Branscomb; P Predki; P Richardson; S Wenning; T Slezak; N Doggett; J F Cheng; A Olsen; S Lucas; C Elkin; E Uberbacher; M Frazier; R A Gibbs; D M Muzny; S E Scherer; J B Bouck; E J Sodergren; K C Worley; C M Rives; J H Gorrell; M L Metzker; S L Naylor; R S Kucherlapati; D L Nelson; G M Weinstock; Y Sakaki; A Fujiyama; M Hattori; T Yada; A Toyoda; T Itoh; C Kawagoe; H Watanabe; Y Totoki; T Taylor; J Weissenbach; R Heilig; W Saurin; F Artiguenave; P Brottier; T Bruls; E Pelletier; C Robert; P Wincker; D R Smith; L Doucette-Stamm; M Rubenfield; K Weinstock; H M Lee; J Dubois; A Rosenthal; M Platzer; G Nyakatura; S Taudien; A Rump; H Yang; J Yu; J Wang; G Huang; J Gu; L Hood; L Rowen; A Madan; S Qin; R W Davis; N A Federspiel; A P Abola; M J Proctor; R M Myers; J Schmutz; M Dickson; J Grimwood; D R Cox; M V Olson; R Kaul; C Raymond; N Shimizu; K Kawasaki; S Minoshima; G A Evans; M Athanasiou; R Schultz; B A Roe; F Chen; H Pan; J Ramser; H Lehrach; R Reinhardt; W R McCombie; M de la Bastide; N Dedhia; H Blöcker; K Hornischer; G Nordsiek; R Agarwala; L Aravind; J A Bailey; A Bateman; S Batzoglou; E Birney; P Bork; D G Brown; C B Burge; L Cerutti; H C Chen; D Church; M Clamp; R R Copley; T Doerks; S R Eddy; E E Eichler; T S Furey; J Galagan; J G Gilbert; C Harmon; Y Hayashizaki; D Haussler; H Hermjakob; K Hokamp; W Jang; L S Johnson; T A Jones; S Kasif; A Kaspryzk; S Kennedy; W J Kent; P Kitts; E V Koonin; I Korf; D Kulp; D Lancet; T M Lowe; A McLysaght; T Mikkelsen; J V Moran; N Mulder; V J Pollara; C P Ponting; G Schuler; J Schultz; G Slater; A F Smit; E Stupka; J Szustakowki; D Thierry-Mieg; J Thierry-Mieg; L Wagner; J Wallis; R Wheeler; A Williams; Y I Wolf; K H Wolfe; S P Yang; R F Yeh; F Collins; M S Guyer; J Peterson; A Felsenfeld; K A Wetterstrand; A Patrinos; M J Morgan; P de Jong; J J Catanese; K Osoegawa; H Shizuya; S Choi; Y J Chen; J Szustakowki
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Chromosome territories, interchromatin domain compartment, and nuclear matrix: an integrated view of the functional nuclear architecture.

Authors:  T Cremer; G Kreth; H Koester; R H Fink; R Heintzmann; M Cremer; I Solovei; D Zink; C Cremer
Journal:  Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.807

5.  Coupled homologous and nonhomologous repair of a double-strand break preserves genomic integrity in mammalian cells.

Authors:  C Richardson; M Jasin
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Proximity of chromosomal loci that participate in radiation-induced rearrangements in human cells.

Authors:  M N Nikiforova; J R Stringer; R Blough; M Medvedovic; J A Fagin; Y E Nikiforov
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-10-06       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Mechanisms of DNA double-strand break repair and their potential to induce chromosomal aberrations.

Authors:  P Pfeiffer; W Goedecke; G Obe
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.000

8.  Homology search and choice of homologous partner during mitotic recombination.

Authors:  O Inbar; M Kupiec
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Engineered interphase chromosome loops guide intrachromosomal recombination.

Authors:  R Kostriken; C J Wedeen
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 10.  Mini review: form and function in the human interphase chromosome.

Authors:  E Chevret; E V Volpi; D Sheer
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  2000
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Spatial genome organization in the formation of chromosomal translocations.

Authors:  Karen J Meaburn; Tom Misteli; Evi Soutoglou
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 15.707

Review 2.  Genome destabilization by homologous recombination in the germ line.

Authors:  Mariko Sasaki; Julian Lange; Scott Keeney
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 94.444

3.  Transcription of a donor enhances its use during double-strand break-induced gene conversion in human cells.

Authors:  Ezra Schildkraut; Cheryl A Miller; Jac A Nickoloff
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  A ribonucleoprotein transfection strategy for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing and single cell cloning in rainbow trout cells.

Authors:  Marina Zoppo; Nicole Okoniewski; Stanislav Pantelyushin; Johannes Vom Berg; Kristin Schirmer
Journal:  Cell Biosci       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 7.133

5.  Repair-mediated duplication by capture of proximal chromosomal DNA has shaped vertebrate genome evolution.

Authors:  John K Pace; Shurjo K Sen; Mark A Batzer; Cédric Feschotte
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 5.917

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.