Literature DB >> 16581784

Transcription of a donor enhances its use during double-strand break-induced gene conversion in human cells.

Ezra Schildkraut1, Cheryl A Miller, Jac A Nickoloff.   

Abstract

Homologous recombination (HR) mediates accurate repair of double-strand breaks (DSBs) but carries the risk of large-scale genetic change, including loss of heterozygosity, deletions, inversions, and translocations. Nearly one-third of the human genome consists of repetitive sequences, and DSB repair by HR often requires choices among several homologous repair templates, including homologous chromosomes, sister chromatids, and linked or unlinked repeats. Donor preference during DSB-induced gene conversion was analyzed by using several HR substrates with three copies of neo targeted to a human chromosome. Repair of I-SceI nuclease-induced DSBs in one neo (the recipient) required a choice between two donor neo genes. When both donors were downstream, there was no significant bias for proximal or distal donors. When donors flanked the recipient, we observed a marked (85%) preference for the downstream donor. Reversing the HR substrate in the chromosome eliminated this preference, indicating that donor choice is influenced by factors extrinsic to the HR substrate. Prior indirect evidence suggested that transcription might increase donor use. We tested this question directly and found that increased transcription of a donor enhances its use during gene conversion. A preference for transcribed donors would minimize the use of nontranscribed (i.e., pseudogene) templates during repair and thus help maintain genome stability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16581784      PMCID: PMC1446947          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.26.8.3098-3105.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  78 in total

1.  Collisions between yeast chromosomal loci in vivo are governed by three layers of organization.

Authors:  S M Burgess; N Kleckner
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1999-07-15       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Binding of double-strand breaks in DNA by human Rad52 protein.

Authors:  E Van Dyck; A Z Stasiak; A Stasiak; S C West
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-04-22       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Preferential accessibility to specific genomic loci for the repair of double-strand breaks in human cells.

Authors:  Hélène D'Anjou; Catherine Chabot; Pierre Chartrand
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-11-23       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 4.  Molecular mechanisms of DNA double strand break repair.

Authors:  R Kanaar; J H Hoeijmakers; D C van Gent
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 20.808

5.  Double-strand break repair by interchromosomal recombination: suppression of chromosomal translocations.

Authors:  C Richardson; M E Moynahan; M Jasin
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1998-12-15       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 6.  Mechanistic parallels between DNA replication, recombination and transcription.

Authors:  T Kodadek
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 13.807

Review 7.  Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  F Pâques; J E Haber
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 11.056

8.  Homology search and choice of homologous partner during mitotic recombination.

Authors:  O Inbar; M Kupiec
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Mammalian XRCC2 promotes the repair of DNA double-strand breaks by homologous recombination.

Authors:  R D Johnson; N Liu; M Jasin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-09-23       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 10.  A locus control region regulates yeast recombination.

Authors:  J E Haber
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 11.639

View more
  7 in total

1.  Somatic Diversification of Rearranged Antibody Gene Segments by Intra- and Interchromosomal Templated Mutagenesis.

Authors:  Gordon A Dale; Daniel J Wilkins; Jordan Rowley; Christopher D Scharer; Christopher M Tipton; Jennifer Hom; Jeremy M Boss; Victor Corces; Ignacio Sanz; Joshy Jacob
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 2.  Transcription as a source of genome instability.

Authors:  Nayun Kim; Sue Jinks-Robertson
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Genome Fractionation and Loss of Heterozygosity in Hybrids and Polyploids: Mechanisms, Consequences for Selection, and Link to Gene Function.

Authors:  Karel Janko; Oldřich Bartoš; Jan Kočí; Jan Roslein; Edita Janková Drdová; Jan Kotusz; Jan Eisner; Martin Mokrejš; Eva Štefková-Kašparová
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  Epigenetic modification of the repair donor regulates targeted gene correction.

Authors:  Olivier Humbert; Nancy Maizels
Journal:  Mol Ther Nucleic Acids       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 10.183

5.  Chromatin structure regulates gene conversion.

Authors:  W Jason Cummings; Munehisa Yabuki; Ellen C Ordinario; David W Bednarski; Simon Quay; Nancy Maizels
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 8.029

6.  Histone H3 Variant Regulates RNA Polymerase II Transcription Termination and Dual Strand Transcription of siRNA Loci in Trypanosoma brucei.

Authors:  David Reynolds; Brigitte T Hofmeister; Laura Cliffe; Magdy Alabady; T Nicolai Siegel; Robert J Schmitz; Robert Sabatini
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 5.917

7.  Parallel Concerted Evolution of Ribosomal Protein Genes in Fungi and Its Adaptive Significance.

Authors:  Alison Mullis; Zhaolian Lu; Yu Zhan; Tzi-Yuan Wang; Judith Rodriguez; Ahmad Rajeh; Ajay Chatrath; Zhenguo Lin
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 16.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.