Literature DB >> 9486144

Frequency selectivity, multistability, and oscillations emerge from models of genetic regulatory systems.

P Smolen1, D A Baxter, J H Byrne.   

Abstract

To examine the capability of genetic regulatory systems for complex dynamic activity, we developed simple kinetic models that incorporate known features of these systems. These include autoregulation and stimulus-dependent phosphorylation of transcription factors (TFs), dimerization of TFs, crosstalk, and feedback. The simplest model manifested multiple stable steady states, and brief perturbations could switch the model between these states. Such transitions might explain, for example, how a brief pulse of hormone or neurotransmitter could elicit a long-lasting cellular response. In slightly more complex models, oscillatory regimes were identified. The addition of competition between activating and repressing TFs provided a plausible explanation for optimal stimulus frequencies that give maximal transcription. Such optimal frequencies are suggested by recent experiments comparing training paradigms for long-term memory formation and examining changes in mRNA levels in repetitively stimulated cultured cells. In general, the computational approach illustrated here, combined with appropriate experiments, provides a conceptual framework for investigating the function of genetic regulatory systems.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9486144     DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.1998.274.2.C531

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol        ISSN: 0002-9513


  35 in total

1.  Noise-based switches and amplifiers for gene expression.

Authors:  J Hasty; J Pradines; M Dolnik; J J Collins
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-02-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Positive feedback in eukaryotic gene networks: cell differentiation by graded to binary response conversion.

Authors:  A Becskei; B Séraphin; L Serrano
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Detection of multistability, bifurcations, and hysteresis in a large class of biological positive-feedback systems.

Authors:  David Angeli; James E Ferrell; Eduardo D Sontag
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-02-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Prediction and measurement of an autoregulatory genetic module.

Authors:  Farren J Isaacs; Jeff Hasty; Charles R Cantor; J J Collins
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-06-13       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Importance of input perturbations and stochastic gene expression in the reverse engineering of genetic regulatory networks: insights from an identifiability analysis of an in silico network.

Authors:  Daniel E Zak; Gregory E Gonye; James S Schwaber; Francis J Doyle
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 6.  A comparative analysis of synthetic genetic oscillators.

Authors:  Oliver Purcell; Nigel J Savery; Claire S Grierson; Mario di Bernardo
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Maximum Caliber Can Build and Infer Models of Oscillation in a Three-Gene Feedback Network.

Authors:  Taylor Firman; Anar Amgalan; Kingshuk Ghosh
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 2.991

8.  The use of oscillatory signals in the study of genetic networks.

Authors:  Ovidiu Lipan; Wing H Wong
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Untangling the wires: a strategy to trace functional interactions in signaling and gene networks.

Authors:  Boris N Kholodenko; Anatoly Kiyatkin; Frank J Bruggeman; Eduardo Sontag; Hans V Westerhoff; Jan B Hoek
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-09-19       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Synchronizing genetic relaxation oscillators by intercell signaling.

Authors:  David McMillen; Nancy Kopell; Jeff Hasty; J J Collins
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.