Literature DB >> 30507199

Maximum Caliber Can Build and Infer Models of Oscillation in a Three-Gene Feedback Network.

Taylor Firman, Anar Amgalan, Kingshuk Ghosh.   

Abstract

Single-cell protein expression time trajectories provide rich temporal data quantifying cellular variability and its role in dictating fitness. However, theoretical models to analyze and fully extract information from these measurements remain limited for three reasons: (i) gene expression profiles are noisy, rendering models of averages inapplicable, (ii) experiments typically measure only a few protein species while leaving other molecular actors-necessary to build traditional bottom-up models-unnoticed, and (iii) measured data are in fluorescence, not particle number. We recently addressed these challenges in an alternate top-down approach using the principle of Maximum Caliber (MaxCal) to model genetic switches with one and two protein species. In the present work we address scalability and broader applicability of MaxCal by extending to a three-gene (A, B, C) feedback network that exhibits oscillation, commonly known as the repressilator. We test MaxCal's inferential power by using synthetic data of noisy protein number time traces-serving as a proxy for experimental data-generated from a known underlying model. We notice that the minimal MaxCal model-accounting for production, degradation, and only one type of symmetric coupling between all three species-reasonably infers several underlying features of the circuit such as the effective production rate, degradation rate, frequency of oscillation, and protein number distribution. Next, we build models of higher complexity including different levels of coupling between A, B, and C and rigorously assess their relative performance. While the minimal model (with four parameters) performs remarkably well, we note that the most complex model (with six parameters) allowing all possible forms of crosstalk between A, B, and C slightly improves prediction of rates, but avoids ad hoc assumption of all the other models. It is also the model of choice based on Bayesian information criteria. We further analyzed time trajectories in arbitrary fluorescence (using synthetic trajectories) to mimic realistic data. We conclude that even with a three-protein system including both fluorescence noise and intrinsic gene expression fluctuations, MaxCal can faithfully infer underlying details of the network, opening future directions to model other network motifs with many species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30507199      PMCID: PMC6800126          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b07465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  68 in total

1.  Bacterial persistence as a phenotypic switch.

Authors:  Nathalie Q Balaban; Jack Merrin; Remy Chait; Lukasz Kowalik; Stanislas Leibler
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-08-12       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Stochasticity in gene expression: from theories to phenotypes.

Authors:  Mads Kaern; Timothy C Elston; William J Blake; James J Collins
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Genetic toggle switch without cooperative binding.

Authors:  Azi Lipshtat; Adiel Loinger; Nathalie Q Balaban; Ofer Biham
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2006-05-08       Impact factor: 9.161

4.  Perspective: Maximum caliber is a general variational principle for dynamical systems.

Authors:  Purushottam D Dixit; Jason Wagoner; Corey Weistuch; Steve Pressé; Kingshuk Ghosh; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2018-01-07       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Maximum Caliber Can Characterize Genetic Switches with Multiple Hidden Species.

Authors:  Taylor Firman; Stephen Wedekind; T J McMorrow; Kingshuk Ghosh
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Model genetic circuits encoding autoregulatory transcription factors.

Authors:  A D Keller
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1995-01-21       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 7.  Functional roles for noise in genetic circuits.

Authors:  Avigdor Eldar; Michael B Elowitz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Fundamental limits on the suppression of molecular fluctuations.

Authors:  Ioannis Lestas; Glenn Vinnicombe; Johan Paulsson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Asymmetric stochastic switching driven by intrinsic molecular noise.

Authors:  David Frigola; Laura Casanellas; José M Sancho; Marta Ibañes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  High variation of fluorescence protein maturation times in closely related Escherichia coli strains.

Authors:  Elke Hebisch; Johannes Knebel; Janek Landsberg; Erwin Frey; Madeleine Leisner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Inferring a network from dynamical signals at its nodes.

Authors:  Corey Weistuch; Luca Agozzino; Lilianne R Mujica-Parodi; Ken A Dill
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 4.475

2.  Inferring causality in biological oscillators.

Authors:  Jonathan Tyler; Daniel Forger; JaeKyoung Kim
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Critical Comparison of MaxCal and Other Stochastic Modeling Approaches in Analysis of Gene Networks.

Authors:  Taylor Firman; Jonathan Huihui; Austin R Clark; Kingshuk Ghosh
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 2.524

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.