Literature DB >> 9484254

Are rural general practitioner--obstetricians performing too many prenatal ultrasound examinations? Evidence from western Labrador.

E Thompson1, D Freake, G Worrall.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of prenatal ultrasonography (PNU) in western Labrador in 1994, assess the appropriateness of the ultrasound examinations according to current guidelines and determine whether there was any relation between number of PNU examinations and patient management and obstetric outcomes.
DESIGN: Review of all obstetric charts and PNU requisition forms for all deliveries in one hospital in 1994.
SETTING: Labrador City and Wabush, Newfoundland.
RESULTS: During the study period, there were 103 singleton deliveries, and these mothers underwent a total of 225 PNU studies (mean 2.16 studies per delivery). More than half (53.3%) of the examinations were classified as inappropriate. There were no significant differences in the number of studies between low- and high-risk pregnancies or between uncomplicated deliveries and those in which induction or instrumental or operative delivery occurred, nor was there any relation between number of PNU examinations and maternal or neonatal outcome.
CONCLUSION: Compared with PNU use as recommended by the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination, this type of examination was overused in Labrador City and Wabush, although the rate of use was comparable to that reported in other Canadian studies. This overuse was not associated with any identifiable effect on maternal or neonatal outcome or on the management of pregnancy and labour. More judicious use of PNU, in accordance with evidence-based guidelines, is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9484254      PMCID: PMC1228830     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  17 in total

1.  The value of routine early pregnancy ultrasound in the antenatal booking clinic.

Authors:  M J Peek; K J Devonald; R Beilby; D Ellwood
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.100

Review 2.  Assessing obstetric risk. A review of obstetric risk-scoring systems.

Authors:  E M Wall
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 0.493

3.  Rethinking risk.

Authors:  P F Hall
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Defensive medicine and obstetrics.

Authors:  L M Baldwin; L G Hart; M Lloyd; M Fordyce; R A Rosenblatt
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995 Nov 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Reliability of the Guide to Pregnancy Risk Grading of the Ontario Antenatal Record in assessing obstetric risk.

Authors:  B G Hutchison; R Milner
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1994-06-15       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Obstetric referral in family practice. Factors Affecting Cesarean Section (FACS) Study Group.

Authors:  W J Hueston
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 0.493

7.  Are physicians changing the way they practise obstetrics?

Authors:  J Ruderman; J C Carroll; A J Reid; M A Murray
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-02-01       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Family medicine in a tertiary care hospital. Obstetrical outcomes and interventions.

Authors:  D Gaspar; J Jordan
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.275

9.  Family practice obstetrics in a teaching hospital. Does a tertiary care environment make a difference?

Authors:  J M Jordan; D Gaspar
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  Consultation in family practice obstetrics.

Authors:  A J Reid; J C Carroll; J Ruderman; M Murray
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.275

View more
  2 in total

1.  Proliferation of prenatal ultrasonography.

Authors:  John J You; David A Alter; Therese A Stukel; Sarah D McDonald; Andreas Laupacis; Ying Liu; Joel G Ray
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Utilisation of obstetric sonography at a peri-urban health centre in Uganda.

Authors:  Mubuuke Aloysius Gonzaga; Elsie Kiguli-Malwadde; Francis Businge; Rosemary Kusaba Byanyima
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2010-12-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.