Literature DB >> 3042905

Assessing obstetric risk. A review of obstetric risk-scoring systems.

E M Wall1.   

Abstract

The primary purpose of formal risk assessment in obstetrics is the prevention and consequent reduction of perinatal morbidity and mortality through early identification and intervention. Obstetric risk scoring quantifies identified risk factors according to their relative contribution to adverse perinatal outcomes and aggregates individual factor scores. A review of existing scoring methods reveals consistently low positive predictive values and more accurate prediction when the assessment occurs closer to the time of actual delivery. While numerous scoring systems exist in the literature, few are convenient in practice, and none appear to assess effectively the dynamic character of pregnancy.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3042905

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Pract        ISSN: 0094-3509            Impact factor:   0.493


  10 in total

Review 1.  Reducing stillbirths: screening and monitoring during pregnancy and labour.

Authors:  Rachel A Haws; Mohammad Yawar Yakoob; Tanya Soomro; Esme V Menezes; Gary L Darmstadt; Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 3.007

2.  Are rural general practitioner--obstetricians performing too many prenatal ultrasound examinations? Evidence from western Labrador.

Authors:  E Thompson; D Freake; G Worrall
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-02-10       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Differences in intrapartum obstetric care provided to women at low risk by family physicians and obstetricians.

Authors:  A J Reid; J C Carroll; J Ruderman; M A Murray
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1989-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Conceptualizations, measurement, and effects of prenatal maternal stress on birth outcomes.

Authors:  M Lobel
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1994-06

5.  Rethinking risk.

Authors:  P F Hall
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Reliability of the Guide to Pregnancy Risk Grading of the Ontario Antenatal Record in assessing obstetric risk.

Authors:  B G Hutchison; R Milner
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1994-06-15       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Psychosocial risk factors during pregnancy. What do family physicians ask about?

Authors:  J C Carroll; A J Reid; A Biringer; L M Wilson; D K Midmer
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  Are physicians changing the way they practise obstetrics?

Authors:  J Ruderman; J C Carroll; A J Reid; M A Murray
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-02-01       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Using the ALPHA form in practice to assess antenatal psychosocial health. Antenatal Psychosocial Health Assessment.

Authors:  A J Reid; A Biringer; J D Carroll; D Midmer; L M Wilson; B Chalmers; D E Stewart
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-09-22       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Utilisation of obstetric sonography at a peri-urban health centre in Uganda.

Authors:  Mubuuke Aloysius Gonzaga; Elsie Kiguli-Malwadde; Francis Businge; Rosemary Kusaba Byanyima
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2010-12-28
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.