Literature DB >> 7787490

Family medicine in a tertiary care hospital. Obstetrical outcomes and interventions.

D Gaspar1, J Jordan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the rates of obstetrical complications and interventions among patients managed or comanaged by family physicians.
DESIGN: Case series. Retrospective review of hospital records.
SETTING: Victoria Hospital, a tertiary care centre affiliated with the University of Western Ontario in London, Ont. PARTICIPANTS: Five hundred forty-two women in labour admitted consecutively by family physicians from October 1, 1990, to September 31, 1991. There were no exclusions based on antenatal risk. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Degree of risk on admission, and rates of cesarean sections, inductions, epidurals, forceps deliveries, episiotomies, perineal tears, postpartum hemorrhages, and postpartum fever for mothers. For newborns, Apgar scores and rate of need for a pediatric critical care unit or special observation nursery.
RESULTS: Except for rates of inductions and episiotomies, which were lower than those reported elsewhere, results were all comparable to those in previous North American studies of low-risk family medicine obstetric patients.
CONCLUSION: Family physicians care for women with a range of antenatal risks. Even when practising in tertiary care environments, family physicians can minimize many obstetrical interventions while maintaining good maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7787490      PMCID: PMC2146519     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  16 in total

1.  Episiotomy: Differences in practice between family physicians and obstetricians.

Authors:  J Ruderman; J C Carroli; A J Reid; M A Murray
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Trends in Canadian Birth Weights, 1971 to 1989: Studying weight trends in singleton births.

Authors:  S Wadhera; W J Millar; C Nimrod
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Obstetric outcomes in a rural family practice: an eight-year experience.

Authors:  S H Kriebel; J D Pitts
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 0.493

4.  Changes in the management of labour: 1. Length and management of the second stage.

Authors:  J L Reynolds; P L Yudkin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1987-05-15       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Obstetrical care in a prepaid cooperative: a comparison between family practice residents, family physicians, and obstetricians.

Authors:  M J Wanderer; J G Suyehira
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 0.493

6.  A study of pregnancy outcomes in a maternity center and a tertiary care hospital.

Authors:  G Baruffi; W S Dellinger; D M Stobino; A Rudolph; R Y Timmons; A Ross
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  A comparison of family physicians' and obstetricians' intrapartum management of low-risk pregnancies.

Authors:  S E MacDonald; K Voaklander; R V Birtwhistle
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 0.493

8.  The quality of obstetric care in family practice: are family physicians as safe as obstetricians?

Authors:  M B Mengel; W R Phillips
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 0.493

9.  Relation of family physician or specialist care to obstetric interventions and outcomes in patients at low risk: a western Canadian cohort study.

Authors:  E H Krikke; N R Bell
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1989-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  How safe is general practitioner obstetrics?

Authors:  G W Taylor; W Edgar; B A Taylor; D G Neal
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1980-12-13       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  4 in total

1.  Are rural general practitioner--obstetricians performing too many prenatal ultrasound examinations? Evidence from western Labrador.

Authors:  E Thompson; D Freake; G Worrall
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-02-10       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Comparing obstetric practice patterns.

Authors:  S J McMurray
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Innovative low-risk maternity clinic. Family physicians provide care in Calgary.

Authors:  C A Lane; S M Malm
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Risk adjustment in maternity care: the use of indirect standardization.

Authors:  James M Nicholson
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2010-08-20
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.