Literature DB >> 7787491

Family practice obstetrics in a teaching hospital. Does a tertiary care environment make a difference?

J M Jordan1, D Gaspar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine referral rates, to study the nature of consultations with obstetricians, and to examine how both patient and physician characteristics affect referrals.
DESIGN: Case series. Retrospective review of hospital records.
SETTING: Victoria Hospital, a tertiary care centre affiliated with the University of Western Ontario in London, Ont. PARTICIPANTS: Five hundred forty-two women admitted consecutively for delivery under the care of family physicians from October 1, 1990, to September 31, 1991. OUTCOME MEASURE: The number and types of obstetrical consultations obtained for the study population.
RESULTS: Of the 50.7% of cases requiring consultation, half were delivered by obstetricians. The most common reasons for consultation were failure to progress in labour, induction of labour, posterior presentation, fetal distress, and pregnancy-induced hypertension. The most common reasons for obstetricians to attend delivery were to perform forceps rotations and cesarean sections.
CONCLUSIONS: Parity and risk classification were the two most important factors for predicting whether consultation would occur. The high rate of consultation in this study might relate to ease of access to consultation in a tertiary care environment. More study is needed to examine the reasons for consultation because it seems that some of the situations for which obstetricians were consulted could have been safely managed by family physicians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7787491      PMCID: PMC2146512     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  17 in total

1.  Does the underprivileged area index work?

Authors:  R Leavey; J Wood
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-09-14

2.  Do general practitioner deliveries constitute a perinatal mortality risk?

Authors:  N Black
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1982-02-13

3.  Obstetrical care in a prepaid cooperative: a comparison between family practice residents, family physicians, and obstetricians.

Authors:  M J Wanderer; J G Suyehira
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 0.493

4.  A study of pregnancy outcomes in a maternity center and a tertiary care hospital.

Authors:  G Baruffi; W S Dellinger; D M Stobino; A Rudolph; R Y Timmons; A Ross
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  A comparison of low-risk pregnant women booked for delivery in two systems of care: shared-care (consultant) and integrated general practice unit. I. Obstetrical procedures and neonatal outcome.

Authors:  M Klein; I Lloyd; C Redman; M Bull; A C Turnbull
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1983-02

6.  A comparison of low-risk pregnant women booked for delivery in two systems of care: shared-care (consultant) and integrated general practice unit. II. Labour and delivery management and neonatal outcome.

Authors:  M Klein; I Lloyd; C Redman; M Bull; A C Turnbull
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1983-02

7.  The quality of obstetric care in family practice: are family physicians as safe as obstetricians?

Authors:  M B Mengel; W R Phillips
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 0.493

8.  Obstetric consultations during labor and delivery in a university-based family practice.

Authors:  A S Craig; A O Berg; C R Kirkwood
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 0.493

9.  How safe is general practitioner obstetrics?

Authors:  G W Taylor; W Edgar; B A Taylor; D G Neal
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1980-12-13       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Clinical application of a high-risk scoring system on a family practice obstetric service.

Authors:  J Nuovo
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 0.493

View more
  2 in total

1.  Are rural general practitioner--obstetricians performing too many prenatal ultrasound examinations? Evidence from western Labrador.

Authors:  E Thompson; D Freake; G Worrall
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-02-10       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Towards a better understanding of risk selection in maternal and newborn care: A systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Bahareh Goodarzi; Annika Walker; Lianne Holten; Linda Schoonmade; Pim Teunissen; François Schellevis; Ank de Jonge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.