Literature DB >> 7787489

Consultation in family practice obstetrics.

A J Reid1, J C Carroll, J Ruderman, M Murray.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the types of non-low-risk obstetric patients managed by family physicians in urban teaching hospitals, and to determine indications for consultation for women at low risk when labour began.
METHOD: Retrospective chart review for all patients delivered by family physicians in three downtown Toronto teaching hospitals during 1 year.
RESULTS: Of 1710 cases, 595 (34.8%) were classified as non-low risk, with the main indications being postdates (> 42 weeks) (19.9%); pregnancy-induced hypertension (19.3%); and premature labour (< 37 weeks) (14.8%). Of the 1115 low-risk patients, 363 (32.6%) had an intrapartum consultation, usually for failure to progress (50.1%) or fetal distress (12.7%). More than 80% of intrapartum consultations were associated with induction and augmentation of labour.
CONCLUSION: Family physicians can continue to care for many non-low-risk women, usually with the help of obstetricians. Consultations were obtained for many women at low risk. We need to reevaluate whether some mandatory consultations are necessary in family practice obstetrics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7787489      PMCID: PMC2146522     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  23 in total

1.  An audit of obstetric care in a university family medicine department and an obstetrics-gynecology department.

Authors:  J W Ely; K Ueland; M J Gordon
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 0.493

2.  Is outcome for general practitioner obstetricians influenced by workload and locality?

Authors:  M W Tilyard; S Williams; R J Seddon; M E Oakley; C J Murdoch
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  1988-04-27

3.  General practitioner obstetrics: does risk prediction work?

Authors:  J L Reynolds; P L Yudkin; M J Bull
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1988-07

4.  The development of an index of high-risk pregnancy.

Authors:  J A Fortney; E W Whitehorne
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1982-07-01       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Audit of obstetrical care and outcome in family medicine, obstetrics, and general practice.

Authors:  W R Phillips; G A Rice; R H Layton
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 0.493

6.  Outcome of pregnancies referred to a general practitioner maternity unit in a district hospital.

Authors:  A Prentice; S M Walton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-10-28

7.  Use by general practitioners of obstetric beds in a consultant unit: a further report.

Authors:  K L Oldershaw; J M Brudenell
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1975-01-18

8.  A comparison of low-risk pregnant women booked for delivery in two systems of care: shared-care (consultant) and integrated general practice unit. I. Obstetrical procedures and neonatal outcome.

Authors:  M Klein; I Lloyd; C Redman; M Bull; A C Turnbull
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1983-02

9.  Adverse perinatal outcomes: is physician specialty a risk factor?

Authors:  P Franks; S Eisinger
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 0.493

10.  The relationship of medical specialization (obstetricians and general practitioners) to complications in pregnancy and delivery, birth injury, and malformation.

Authors:  D F Caetano
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1975-10-01       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  4 in total

1.  Does delivery volume of family physicians predict maternal and newborn outcome?

Authors:  Michael C Klein; Andrea Spence; Janusz Kaczorowski; Ann Kelly; Stefan Grzybowski
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-05-14       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Privileging and consultation in maternity and newborn care. Maternity and Newborn Care Committee.

Authors:  S Goluboff; L Reynolds; M Klein; R Handfield-Jones
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Are rural general practitioner--obstetricians performing too many prenatal ultrasound examinations? Evidence from western Labrador.

Authors:  E Thompson; D Freake; G Worrall
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-02-10       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Innovative low-risk maternity clinic. Family physicians provide care in Calgary.

Authors:  C A Lane; S M Malm
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.275

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.