Literature DB >> 8086835

Rethinking risk.

P F Hall.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1994        PMID： 8086835      PMCID： PMC2380167     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN： 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


× No keyword cloud information.
  8 in total

Review 1.  Testing for uncommon conditions. The heroic search for positive test results.

Authors:  S H Woolf; D B Kamerow
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1990-12

2.  Diagnosis of dystocia and management with cesarean section among primiparous women in Ottawa-Carleton.

Authors:  P J Stewart; C Dulberg; A C Arnill; T Elmslie; P F Hall
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1990-03-01       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Inconsistencies in clinical decisions in obstetrics.

Authors:  J F Barrett; G J Jarvis; H N Macdonald; P C Buchan; S N Tyrrell; R J Lilford
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-09-01       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  The role of standardized risk assessment in the provision of prenatal care.

Authors:  I J Parboosingh
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 5.  Assessing obstetric risk. A review of obstetric risk-scoring systems.

Authors:  E M Wall
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 0.493

6.  High-risk obstetrics. II. Value of semiobjective grading system in identifying the vulnerable group.

Authors:  R E Nesbitt; R H Aubry
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1969-04-01       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 7.  Risk analysis and management.

Authors:  M G Morgan
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.142

8.  Electronic fetal monitoring: a Canadian survey.

Authors:  B L Davies; P A Niday; C A Nimrod; E R Drake; A E Sprague; M J Trépanier
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-05-15       Impact factor: 8.262
  8 in total
  7 in total

1.  Are rural general practitioner--obstetricians performing too many prenatal ultrasound examinations? Evidence from western Labrador.

Authors:  E Thompson; D Freake; G Worrall
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-02-10       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  "Remembrance and reflection".

Authors:  P F Hall
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-02-10       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  A Systematic Review of Antenatal Risk Scoring Systems in India to Predict Adverse Neonatal Outcomes.

Authors:  Dinesh Raj Pallepogula; Adhisivam Bethou; Vishnu Bhat Ballambatu; Gowri Dorairajan; Ganesh Kumar Saya; Sureshkumar Kamalakannan; Sandhya Karra
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2021-07-12

Review 4.  Prevention. How much harm? How much benefit? 1. Influence of reporting methods on perception of benefits.

Authors:  K G Marshall
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-05-15       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Utilisation of obstetric sonography at a peri-urban health centre in Uganda.

Authors:  Mubuuke Aloysius Gonzaga; Elsie Kiguli-Malwadde; Francis Businge; Rosemary Kusaba Byanyima
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2010-12-28

6.  High-risk pregnancies and their association with severe maternal morbidity in Nepal: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Sushma Rajbanshi; Mohd Noor Norhayati; Nik Hussain Nik Hazlina
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Cultures of risk and their influence on birth in rural British Columbia.

Authors:  Jude Kornelsen; Stefan Grzybowski
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 2.497
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.